Study Stopped
The forecast regarding the number of patients that could enter the study were not met in the designated period
Prospective Randomized Study to Evaluate the Effect of Embryonic Observation on the Gestation (PROdE)
PROdE
1 other identifier
interventional
193
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In a conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle, daily microscopic observation of embryos outside the incubator to assess their morphology and establish a selection process is performed. In this way it is possible to know which embryo or embryos have greater implantantion capacity and will be transferred to the uterus to obtain a viable pregnancy. However, these observations can produce deleterious effects on embryo development due to changes in temperature, pH and osmolarity of the culture media, as well as a negative effect of direct light microscope for observation. This project aims to test the hypothesis that non-embryonic observation produces a beneficial effect on embryo quality until day 5 of development (blastocyst stage) and, therefore, on rates of implantation and ongoing gestation, compared with the conventional protocol of observations under the inverted microscope on days two, three and five of development.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2021
CompletedJune 23, 2021
June 1, 2021
6.1 years
February 20, 2015
June 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Live Birth Rate
The number of deliveries that resulted in a live born neonate, expressed per 100 embryos
Nine months after treatment.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Positive hCG rate
14 days after oocyte retrieval.
Implantation rate
6-7 weeks after oocyte retrieval.
Ongoing pregnancy rate
12 weeks after B-hCG positive test
Miscarriage rate
From 12 weeks after gestation to delivery
Fertilization rate
16-18 hours after microinjection or insemination
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
No embryo observation (NEO)
NO INTERVENTIONStudy group. No embryonic observation from day one to day five of embryo development.
Embryo observation (EO)
EXPERIMENTALControl group. Conventional embryonic observations performed in day two, three and five of embryo development.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First cycle of ART treatment with conventional IVF or ICSI with donated eggs.
- Normal uterine cavity and a single or double embryo transfer, always performed on day 5 at blastocyst stage.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients above 50 years old, patients that were diagnosed with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and/or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or uterine pathologies,
- Body mass index \>30 kg/m2.
- The use of seminal samples coming from donors or testicular origin.
- Cycles that included preimplantational genetic testing (PGT).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Instituto Bernabeu
Alicante, 03016, Spain
Related Publications (12)
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jun;26(6):1270-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der037. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
PMID: 21502182BACKGROUNDFujiwara M, Takahashi K, Izuno M, Duan YR, Kazono M, Kimura F, Noda Y. Effect of micro-environment maintenance on embryo culture after in-vitro fertilization: comparison of top-load mini incubator and conventional front-load incubator. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007 Jan;24(1):5-9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-006-9088-3. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
PMID: 17160731BACKGROUNDGardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000 Jun;73(6):1155-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00518-5.
PMID: 10856474BACKGROUNDBernabeu R, Roca M, Torres A, Ten J. Indomethacin effect on implantation rates in oocyte recipients. Hum Reprod. 2006 Feb;21(2):364-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei343. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
PMID: 16284067BACKGROUNDHerrero J, Tejera A, Albert C, Vidal C, de los Santos MJ, Meseguer M. A time to look back: analysis of morphokinetic characteristics of human embryo development. Fertil Steril. 2013 Dec;100(6):1602-9.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.033. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
PMID: 24083877BACKGROUNDZhang JQ, Li XL, Peng Y, Guo X, Heng BC, Tong GQ. Reduction in exposure of human embryos outside the incubator enhances embryo quality and blastulation rate. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Apr;20(4):510-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.12.027. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
PMID: 20129824BACKGROUNDKirkegaard K, Kesmodel US, Hindkjaer JJ, Ingerslev HJ. Time-lapse parameters as predictors of blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome in embryos from good prognosis patients: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2013 Oct;28(10):2643-51. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det300. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
PMID: 23900207BACKGROUNDSteptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978 Aug 12;2(8085):366. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92957-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 79723BACKGROUNDBognar Z, Csabai TJ, Pallinger E, Balassa T, Farkas N, Schmidt J, Gorgey E, Berta G, Szekeres-Bartho J, Bodis J. The effect of light exposure on the cleavage rate and implantation capacity of preimplantation murine embryos. J Reprod Immunol. 2019 Apr;132:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
PMID: 30852462BACKGROUNDBarberet J, Chammas J, Bruno C, Valot E, Vuillemin C, Jonval L, Choux C, Sagot P, Soudry A, Fauque P. Randomized controlled trial comparing embryo culture in two incubator systems: G185 K-System versus EmbryoScope. Fertil Steril. 2018 Feb;109(2):302-309.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
PMID: 29175066BACKGROUNDArmstrong S, Bhide P, Jordan V, Pacey A, Marjoribanks J, Farquhar C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 29;5(5):CD011320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub4.
PMID: 31140578BACKGROUNDKalleas D, McEvoy K, Horne G, Roberts SA, Brison DR. Live birth rate following undisturbed embryo culture at low oxygen in a time-lapse incubator compared to a high-quality benchtop incubator. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022 Feb;25(1):147-153. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2020.1729423. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
PMID: 32098536BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jorge Ten Morro, Ph.D.
Instituto Bernabeu
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ph.D. Embryologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2015
First Posted
February 26, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2021
Study Completion
March 1, 2021
Last Updated
June 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06