Concussion Testing: A Novel Non-invasive Concussion Detection Device
1 other identifier
observational
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to establish and evaluate a distinctive signal for concussion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Aug 2011
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 20, 2017
CompletedAugust 2, 2022
July 1, 2022
4 months
February 21, 2014
June 2, 2015
July 29, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
A Measure Assessing the Sensitivity and Specificity Rate Based on the Nautilus Neurowave Data
Sensitivity (also called the true positive rate) measures the proportion of concussed participants that are correctly identified as such by utilizing the information within the Nautilus Neurowave data. Specificity (also called the true negative rate) measures the proportion of non-concussed participants that are correctly identified as such by utilizing the information within the Nautilus Neurowave data The information that is evaluated from within this data is recognized through the computation of two parameters, R1 and R2. Both R1 and R2 are measured by computing the frequency spectrum using an FFT of the Neurowave data and computing a ratio of the signal intensities at specific higher frequencies against specific lower frequencies within that spectrum. Based on this computation, the recorded data is evaluated as coming from a concussed participant if R1 \>= 1.0 and R2 \>= 0.66 and is considered non-concussed otherwise.
Individual assessments were made within 2 days of recording
Study Arms (2)
Suspected Concussive Event (SCE)
When a subject is suspected of a concussion, a Nautilus NeuroWaveTM System recording is obtained from the subject and the recording is evaluated by a Jan Medical concussion algorithm. The subject is declared concussed or not per the algorithm. This is compared to a Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) test.
Control
All subjects at the start of study have a baseline recording using the Nautilus NeuroWaveTM System. These subjects are enrolled into the study as non-concussed and these recordings serve as control recordings. Additionally, some subjects from this cohort will be recorded again at the end of the study to obtain end of season recordings. These results are compared to a Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) test.
Interventions
Recording of subjects with Nautilus NeuroWave diagnostic device
A Neurocognitive evaluation of the patients to assess for concussion.
Eligibility Criteria
Varsity high school football players at a local High School.
You may qualify if:
- Junior Varsity and Varsity Players a local High School.
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Los Altos High School
Los Altos, California, 94022, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This is a pilot study only. Only 15 concussions were observed from a single gender teenage population from one high school football team over one season. Further data from a broader population is needed to confirm results.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Paul Auerbach
- Organization
- Stanford University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul S Auerbach
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2014
First Posted
February 25, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 2, 2022
Results First Posted
April 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share