NCT02367508

Brief Summary

The study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a mindfulness meditation-based intervention designed to provide a synergistic solution to the avoidant coping that often inhibits advance care planning discussions that are crucial to quality end-of-life care.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
31

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2014

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2014

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 31, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 20, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

July 28, 2016

Status Verified

July 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

December 31, 2014

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

advance care planningcoping skillsmindfulnessmeditationcanceradultcaregiversoncology providersadvance directivesanxietydepressionquality of lifepilot project

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Feasibility: Recruitment Rates at Baseline

    The number of individuals who are eligible will be divided by the number of individuals approached.

    Recruitment rates will be estimated at baseline.

  • Feasibility: Enrollment Rates at Baseline

    The number of enrolled individuals will be divided by the number of eligible individuals.

    Enrollment rates will be caluclated at baseline.

  • Feasibility: Attendance at Post-Intervention (6 weeks)

    The mean number of sessions attended by each participant type (i.e., patients, family caregivers, providers) will be calculated and compared to the total number of MODEL care sessions provided (i.e., 6 for patients/family caregivers and 5 for providers).

    Attendance will be calculated at the end of the intervention (6 weeks).

  • Feasibility: Retention Rates at Post-Intervention (6 weeks)

    The proportion of the total number of participants enrolled who completed post-intervention assessments (at 6 weeks) will be calculated by dividing the number of individuals assessed post-intervention (6 weeks) by the number of participants who were enrolled/assessed at baseline.

    Retention rates will be calculated at the end of the intervention (6 weeks).

  • Acceptability: Intervention Satisfaction at Post-Intervention (6 weeks)

    An investigator-created measure of intervention satisfaction will be administered. This measure includes items assessing participants' overall satisfaction, satisfaction with different components of the intervention, likelihood of recommending the course to others, and the intention to continue using MODEL Care skills. The mean score on the satisfaction scale will be calculated for each group (patients, family caregivers, and providers) post-intervention (6 weeks).

    Participants' satisfaction with the intervention will be assessed at the end of the intervention (6 weeks).

  • Feasibility: Retention Rates at 1-Month Follow-up (10 weeks)

    The proportion of the total number of participants enrolled who completed 1-month follow-up assessments (at 10 weeks) will be calculated by dividing the number of individuals who were assessed at 1-month follow-up (10 weeks) by the number of participants enrolled/assessed at baseline.

    Retention rates will be calculated at 1-month follow-up (10 weeks).

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Change from Baseline in Avoidant Coping at Post-Intervention (6 weeks)

    Avoidant coping will be measured at baseline and post-intervention (6-weeks) for all three groups (patients, family caregivers, and health care providers).

  • Change from Baseline in Avoidant Coping at 1-Month Follow-up (10 weeks)

    Avoidant coping will be measured at baseline and at 1-month follow up (10 weeks) for all three groups (patients, family caregivers, and health care providers).

  • Change from Baseline in Quality of Life at Post-Intervention (6 weeks)

    Quality of life will be measured at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks) for all three groups (patients, family caregivers, and health care providers).

  • Change from Baseline in Quality of Life at 1-Month Follow-up (10 weeks)

    Quality of life will be measured at baseline and at 1-month follow-up (10 weeks) for all three groups (patients, family caregivers, and health care providers).

  • Change from Baseline in Depression at Post-Intervention (6 weeks)

    Depression will be measured at baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks) for all three groups (patients, family caregivers, and health care providers).

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

MODEL Care

EXPERIMENTAL

Mindfully Optimizing Delivery of End-of-Life Care (MODEL Care) is a mindfulness meditation-based intervention to facilitate timely advance care planning (ACP) and end-of-life conversations with greater ease. Participants are taught a variety of mindfulness practices (e.g., breath awareness, sitting meditation, mindful movement through gentle yoga, and mindful communication) that can be used to enhance end-of-life coping.

Behavioral: MODEL Care

Interventions

MODEL CareBEHAVIORAL

The Mindfully Optimizing Delivery of End-of-Life Care (MODEL Care) intervention is two-pronged and mutually interactive with: (1) a patient and family caregiver group, and (2) an oncology provider group. Patients and family caregivers meet as a group for 6 weekly sessions of 2 hours each, for a total of 12 hours of class time. Oncology providers will have 5 class sessions for a total of 16 hours of class time. One class is held conjointly with patients, family caregivers, and providers to practice newly-learned skills. The course curriculum is generally based on mindfulness practices, group discussion, and didactic teaching with an emphasis on embodying interpersonal mindfulness in dialogue in daily life.

MODEL Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Oncologists:
  • Be a physician specializing in medical oncology
  • Care for oncology patients at the affiliated cancer center
  • Have a patient panel that will allow for ≥6 eligible patients to be enrolled in the study
  • Be willing to attend the 5-session MODEL Care program for providers at the specified location, date, and time
  • Patients:
  • Adults ≥ 18 years of age
  • Receiving care from a medical oncologist enrolled in the study
  • Diagnosed with an incurable and advanced-stage solid malignancy (late stage III \[B or C\] or stage IV)
  • Have an attending medical oncologist who would not be surprised if the patient died in the next 12 months
  • Willing and able to travel to the class location for 6 weekly 2-hour sessions
  • Have a family member or friend eligible and interested in participating in the MODEL Care study
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent
  • Not have completed a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form
  • Family Caregivers:
  • +4 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Oncologists:
  • Planning to leave current practice setting for other employment in the next 3 months.
  • Patients:
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of \>2 or Karnofsky performance status \<60 (suggesting patient is capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours, or requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care) as rated by the attending oncologist
  • Currently receiving hospice care.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Johns SA, Beck-Coon K, Stutz PV, Talib TL, Chinh K, Cottingham AH, Schmidt K, Shields C, Stout ME, Stump TE, Monahan PO, Torke AM, Helft PR. Mindfulness Training Supports Quality of Life and Advance Care Planning in Adults With Metastatic Cancer and Their Caregivers: Results of a Pilot Study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Feb;37(2):88-99. doi: 10.1177/1049909119862254. Epub 2019 Aug 4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeoplasmsAnxiety DisordersDepression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Shelley A. Johns, PsyD

    Indiana University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2014

First Posted

February 20, 2015

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion

April 1, 2014

Study Completion

May 1, 2015

Last Updated

July 28, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-07