NCT02366767

Brief Summary

The overall aim of this research proposal is to determine the safety, feasibility and efficacy of an automatic closed-loop insulin delivery system.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2014

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2014

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 26, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2014

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 19, 2015

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 6, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

March 17, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

June 26, 2014

Results QC Date

October 28, 2015

Last Update Submit

February 9, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Insulin Infusion SystemsContinuous Glucose Monitors

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Safety of Automatic Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

    1. As measured by the number of events of plasma glucose values ≤ 50 mg/dL OR frequency of system alerts preceding a plasma glucose value of ≤ 50 mg/dL in all subjects 2. As measured by the number of events of system alerts of plasma glucose values \>300 mg/dL lasting for more than one hour in all subjects. 3. As measured by number of events of serum ketones \>3 mmol/L in all subjects 4. As measured by the number of events meeting the criteria for severe hypoglycemia, defined as hypoglycemic seizure, loss of consciousness or coma or an event requiring administration of glucagon or IV glucose in all subjects

    6 days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Feasibility of Using the Automatic Closed Loop Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

    6 days

  • Efficacy of Hybrid Closed-loop System in Comparison With Control

    6 days

Study Arms (2)

automatic closed-loop insulin delivery

EXPERIMENTAL

The closed-loop arm will consist of participants wearing a sensor and transmitter which transmits sensor glucose data. The algorithm determines insulin delivery rates and this is delivered in microboluses every 5 minutes

Device: Automatic closed-loop insulin delivery

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The subjects in the control arm will wear the 530G system using Enlite and MiniLink transmitter and threshold suspend.

Device: Control

Interventions

Sensor transmit glucose data every 5 minutes to the control algorithm which adjusts insulin delivery every 5 minutes.

automatic closed-loop insulin delivery
ControlDEVICE

Threshold suspend

Also known as: 530G Pump
Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes
  • The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes is based on the investigator's judgment
  • C peptide levels and antibody determinations are not required
  • Daily insulin therapy for ≥ 12 months
  • Insulin pump therapy for ≥ 3 months
  • Age 14.0 - 40.0 years
  • Subject comprehends written English
  • Female subjects who are sexually active must be on acceptable method of contraception e.g. oral contraceptive pill, diaphragm, IUD
  • Female subjects past menarche must have a negative urine pregnancy test
  • Informed consent form is signed by the subject and/or parent and assent assigned by the subject if under 18 years of age
  • For subjects under 18 years, both the subject and parent/guardian understand the study protocol and agree to comply with it. Both parents must sign if possible.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has a medical disorder that in the judgment of the investigator will affect the wearing of the devices or the completion of any aspect of the protocol
  • Diabetic ketoacidosis in the past month
  • Hypoglycemic seizure or loss of consciousness or an event requiring glucagon or IV glucose in the past 3 months
  • Subject has a respiratory condition such as asthma, treated with systemic or inhaled corticosteroids in the previous 6 months or cystic fibrosis
  • Subject has a history of any cardiac or vascular disorder such as myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass surgery, coronary artery stenting, transient ischemic attack, cerebrovascular accident, angina, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia or thromboembolic disease
  • Subject has a history of liver or kidney disease (other than microalbuminuria)
  • Subject has active Graves' disease
  • Subjects with inadequately treated thyroid disease or celiac disease
  • Subject has a neurologic disorder that in the judgment of the investigator will affect completion of the protocol
  • Subject has a history of diagnosed medical eating disorder
  • Subject has a history of known illicit drug abuse
  • Subject has a history of known prescription drug abuse
  • Subject has a history of current alcohol abuse
  • Subject has a history of visual impairment which would not allow subject to participate
  • Subject has an active skin condition that would affect sensor placement
  • +8 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Camp Conrad-Chinnock

Angelus Oaks, California, 92305, United States

Location

Packard El Camino Hospital

Mountain View, California, 94040, United States

Location

Lucile Packard Children's Hospital

Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ly TT, Roy A, Grosman B, Shin J, Campbell A, Monirabbasi S, Liang B, von Eyben R, Shanmugham S, Clinton P, Buckingham BA. Day and Night Closed-Loop Control Using the Integrated Medtronic Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Type 1 Diabetes at Diabetes Camp. Diabetes Care. 2015 Jul;38(7):1205-11. doi: 10.2337/dc14-3073. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

This study was in a closely supervised diabetes camp setting. There was close supervision of fingerstick testing using the second drop of blood. Research staff did not assist subjects in carbohydrate counting and meal sizes were unrestricted.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Bruce Buckingham
Organization
Stanford School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Bruce Buckingham, MD

    Stanford University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2014

First Posted

February 19, 2015

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion

September 1, 2014

Study Completion

September 1, 2014

Last Updated

March 17, 2017

Results First Posted

February 6, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations