Assessment of an Automatic Closed-loop Insulin Delivery System
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The overall aim of this research proposal is to determine the safety, feasibility and efficacy of an automatic closed-loop insulin delivery system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 19, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 6, 2017
CompletedMarch 17, 2017
February 1, 2017
3 months
June 26, 2014
October 28, 2015
February 9, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Safety of Automatic Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
1. As measured by the number of events of plasma glucose values ≤ 50 mg/dL OR frequency of system alerts preceding a plasma glucose value of ≤ 50 mg/dL in all subjects 2. As measured by the number of events of system alerts of plasma glucose values \>300 mg/dL lasting for more than one hour in all subjects. 3. As measured by number of events of serum ketones \>3 mmol/L in all subjects 4. As measured by the number of events meeting the criteria for severe hypoglycemia, defined as hypoglycemic seizure, loss of consciousness or coma or an event requiring administration of glucagon or IV glucose in all subjects
6 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Feasibility of Using the Automatic Closed Loop Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
6 days
Efficacy of Hybrid Closed-loop System in Comparison With Control
6 days
Study Arms (2)
automatic closed-loop insulin delivery
EXPERIMENTALThe closed-loop arm will consist of participants wearing a sensor and transmitter which transmits sensor glucose data. The algorithm determines insulin delivery rates and this is delivered in microboluses every 5 minutes
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe subjects in the control arm will wear the 530G system using Enlite and MiniLink transmitter and threshold suspend.
Interventions
Sensor transmit glucose data every 5 minutes to the control algorithm which adjusts insulin delivery every 5 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes
- The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes is based on the investigator's judgment
- C peptide levels and antibody determinations are not required
- Daily insulin therapy for ≥ 12 months
- Insulin pump therapy for ≥ 3 months
- Age 14.0 - 40.0 years
- Subject comprehends written English
- Female subjects who are sexually active must be on acceptable method of contraception e.g. oral contraceptive pill, diaphragm, IUD
- Female subjects past menarche must have a negative urine pregnancy test
- Informed consent form is signed by the subject and/or parent and assent assigned by the subject if under 18 years of age
- For subjects under 18 years, both the subject and parent/guardian understand the study protocol and agree to comply with it. Both parents must sign if possible.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has a medical disorder that in the judgment of the investigator will affect the wearing of the devices or the completion of any aspect of the protocol
- Diabetic ketoacidosis in the past month
- Hypoglycemic seizure or loss of consciousness or an event requiring glucagon or IV glucose in the past 3 months
- Subject has a respiratory condition such as asthma, treated with systemic or inhaled corticosteroids in the previous 6 months or cystic fibrosis
- Subject has a history of any cardiac or vascular disorder such as myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass surgery, coronary artery stenting, transient ischemic attack, cerebrovascular accident, angina, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia or thromboembolic disease
- Subject has a history of liver or kidney disease (other than microalbuminuria)
- Subject has active Graves' disease
- Subjects with inadequately treated thyroid disease or celiac disease
- Subject has a neurologic disorder that in the judgment of the investigator will affect completion of the protocol
- Subject has a history of diagnosed medical eating disorder
- Subject has a history of known illicit drug abuse
- Subject has a history of known prescription drug abuse
- Subject has a history of current alcohol abuse
- Subject has a history of visual impairment which would not allow subject to participate
- Subject has an active skin condition that would affect sensor placement
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stanford Universitylead
- Medtroniccollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Camp Conrad-Chinnock
Angelus Oaks, California, 92305, United States
Packard El Camino Hospital
Mountain View, California, 94040, United States
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
Related Publications (1)
Ly TT, Roy A, Grosman B, Shin J, Campbell A, Monirabbasi S, Liang B, von Eyben R, Shanmugham S, Clinton P, Buckingham BA. Day and Night Closed-Loop Control Using the Integrated Medtronic Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Type 1 Diabetes at Diabetes Camp. Diabetes Care. 2015 Jul;38(7):1205-11. doi: 10.2337/dc14-3073. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
PMID: 26049550RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study was in a closely supervised diabetes camp setting. There was close supervision of fingerstick testing using the second drop of blood. Research staff did not assist subjects in carbohydrate counting and meal sizes were unrestricted.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Bruce Buckingham
- Organization
- Stanford School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bruce Buckingham, MD
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2014
First Posted
February 19, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2014
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 17, 2017
Results First Posted
February 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share