The Use of FNA and FNB in the Optimization of EUS-assisted Tissue Sampling
1 other identifier
interventional
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) for cytology and/or fine needle biopsy (FNB) for histology may be used in the diagnostic work-up of intrathoracic and intrabdominal lesion of unknown origin. Certain lesions (such as pancreatic adenocarcinoma) are often well characterized by cytology assessment of FNA-samples while others are not (such as GIST-tumors). This study is a part observational (early study phase) and part interventional study (late study phase) on the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-assisted tissue sampling by FNA or FNB during a 10-year period on a tertiary endoscopy centre.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedJune 28, 2023
June 1, 2023
13.1 years
January 26, 2015
June 27, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The cellular quality of the EUS-FNA specimens (categorical variable).
Specimens are measured on a standardized 5-grade categorical scale - from 1 (=poor, non-diagnostic yield) to 5 (excellent, completely diagnostic yield). There is no specific unit measured (the variable is not a continuous one). The results from cytology assessment of EUS-derived tissue are compared to the final diagnosis, that is based on the subsequent surgery report. Results from FNA and FNB are regarded equally important. That is why both are treated as Primary Outcomes.
Follow up is by time of surgery (in average 2 months after EUS-FNA)
The histological quality of the EUS-FNB specimens (categorical variable).
Specimens are measured on a standardized 5-grade categorical scale - from 1 (=poor, non-diagnostic yield) to 5 (excellent, completely diagnostic yield). There is no specific unit measured (the variable is not a continuous one). The results from pathology assessment of EUS-derived tissue are compared to the final diagnosis, that is based on the subsequent surgery report. Results from FNA and FNB are regarded equally important. That is why both are treated as Primary Outcomes.
Follow up is by time of surgery (in average 2 months after EUS-FNB)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Immunohistochemistry profiling of EUS
Follow up is by time of surgery (in average 2 months after EUS)
Study Arms (2)
Early
NO INTERVENTIONStudy subjects (patients) undergoing endoscopic ultrasound (with or without FNA/TCB) for clinical reasons during 2005-2011.
Late
OTHERStudy subjects (patients) undergoing endoscopic ultrasound with EUS-guided sampling of various lesions for clinical reasons during 20012-2015. Subjects sampled with both EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB on the same lesion. Randomization on first needle order.
Interventions
Dual sampling with EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB in a randomized order.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Referral for a diagnostic EUS
You may not qualify if:
- Referral for an interventional EUS
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Per Hedenströmlead
Study Sites (1)
Dr Per Hedenström
Gothenburg, S-413 45, Sweden
Related Publications (1)
Hedenstrom P, Demir A, Khodakaram K, Nilsson O, Sadik R. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb;53(2):231-237. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1421704. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
PMID: 29301477DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Riadh Sadik, Prof
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2015
First Posted
February 11, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion
July 31, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
June 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06