The Diagnostic Validity of the Urea Breath Test
The Effect of Citric Acid as the Test Meal on the Diagnostic Accuracy of the 13C-Urea Breath Test in Korean, Randomized Controlled, Open Label Prospective Study
1 other identifier
interventional
1,200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- 1.To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the 13C-Urea breath test between using the citric acid as test meal and controlled group by endoscopic biopsy methods(histology, CLOtest and H. pylori culture).
- 2.To compare the delta value of 13CO2 results between before and after ingestion of citric acid as test meal.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedApril 18, 2019
April 1, 2019
3.8 years
January 18, 2015
April 17, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of participants who showed discrepant result between UBT result and endoscopic result in both citric acid group and controlled group
After urea breath test in the two group (citric acid group vs controlled group), endoscopic surveillance would be performed for confirmation of H. pylori status by endoscopic biopsy methods(histology, CLOtest or culture).
6 months or later after urea breath test
Compare the diagnostic accuracy which is a composite outcome measure such as sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value and negative predictive value between citric acid group and controlled group
Comparing the final H. pylori status between UBT method and endoscopic biopsy methods, we will evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, false positive ratio, false negative ratio, positive predictive value and negative predictive value) of the UBT between using citric acid group and controlled group.
6 months or later after urea breath test
Study Arms (2)
Citric acid group
EXPERIMENTALGiving the citric acid (4g) as test meal before UBT
Controlled group
NO INTERVENTIONNo use of test meal
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female Korean adult (Aged over 18 years)
- The Patients who diagnosed H. pylori infection and received H. pylori eradication therapy
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18 years
- Patients who took any drug which could affect the study results such as proton pump inhibitor, H2 blocker, mucosal protective agents and antibiotics
- Advanced gastric cancer or other malignancy
- Abnormal liver function test or liver cirrhosis
- Abnormal renal function or chronic kidney disease
- Other severe concurrent disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Hospital
Seongnam, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2015
First Posted
February 10, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
April 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04