Supplementary Epidural Analgesia in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) - The SEAVATS Study
SEAVATS
1 other identifier
interventional
161
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Whereas it, in the case of conventional thoracotomy, has been demonstrated that thoracic epidural analgesia is more effective than systemic opioids in terms of pain relief and preservation of postoperative pulmonary function, the efficacy of epidural analgesia in video-assisted thoracic surgical (VATS) procedures, has not been sufficiently studied, but a beneficial effect might very well be present. On the other hand, the risks associated with placement of a thoracic epidural catheter are well known and if similar pain relief can be achieved without it with no or only insignificant alternative side effects, this would be preferable. The literature regarding the usefulness of epidural analgesia for reducing pain in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery is, at best, scarce with two small studies showing some effect and two showing no difference, none of the studies being blinded randomized controlled trials of adequate size. The SEAVATS Study will try to answer this question.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Feb 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 24, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 22, 2023
CompletedJune 27, 2023
June 1, 2023
4 years
February 4, 2015
June 26, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Intensity of pain (Self reported pain intensity)
Self reported pain intensity 5 times a day both in rest and during activity until chest tube is removed or day 4 after operation is reached.
0-4 days
Consumption "Rescue Analgesia" - i.v. opioids
The consumption of i.v. opioids is registered daily until chest tube is removed or day 4 after operation is reached.
0-4 days
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Duration of surgery
0-4 days
Length of hospital stay
0-4 days
Time used placing epidural catheter
0-4 days
Side effects of epidural analgesia
0-4 days
Sequelae following VATS and placement of epidural catheter
60 months
Other Outcomes (4)
Immune cells - NK cell levels.
During surgery and one hour and 24 hours after surgery, and compared with pre-operative levels.
Immune cells - NK cell activity.
During surgery and one hour and 24 hours after surgery, and compared with pre-operative levels.
Cytokines
During surgery and one hour and 24 hours after surgery, and compared with pre-operative levels.
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active Epidural analgesia
ACTIVE COMPARATOREpidural catheter: Bupivacain 1,0 mg/ml + Fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml. Oral analgesia: Paracetamol, NSAID and placebo tablets.
Placebo Epidural analgesia
ACTIVE COMPARATOREpidural analgesia: Placebo. Oral analgesia: Paracetamol, NSAID and opioids tablets.
Interventions
Bupivacain to be given in epidural catheter
Saline to be given in epidural catheter
Paracetamol to be given orally
Placebo tablets to be given instead of oral opioids
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient has accepted to have epidural analgesia as part of the anaesthesia for the procedure.
- Informed consent is attained.
- Patient is over 18 years of age.
- Patient is mentally able to answer questionnaires included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Allergies to any of the medications used in the trial.
- History of previous peptic ulcer.
- History of chronic pain to any degree that will interfere with quantification of pain postoperatively.
- Dementia or reduced mental capacity to any degree that will interfere with quantification of pain postoperatively.
- Pregnancy.
- Contra-indications to placement of epidural catheter.
- Any concurrent cancer disease or use of immune modulating drugs (criteria added as part of a protocol amendment July 27th 2016 for a subsequent biomarkers study)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Odense University Hospital
Odense C, 5000, Denmark
Related Publications (8)
Richardson J, Cheema S. Thoracic paravertebral nerve block. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Apr;96(4):537. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael038. No abstract available.
PMID: 16549628BACKGROUNDKim JA, Kim TH, Yang M, Gwak MS, Kim GS, Kim MJ, Cho HS, Sim WS. Is intravenous patient controlled analgesia enough for pain control in patients who underwent thoracoscopy? J Korean Med Sci. 2009 Oct;24(5):930-5. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.5.930. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
PMID: 19794994BACKGROUNDFreise H, Van Aken HK. Risks and benefits of thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Dec;107(6):859-68. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer339. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
PMID: 22058144BACKGROUNDYie JC, Yang JT, Wu CY, Sun WZ, Cheng YJ. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) following video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: comparison of epidural PCA and intravenous PCA. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2012 Sep;50(3):92-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
PMID: 23026166BACKGROUNDYoshioka M, Mori T, Kobayashi H, Iwatani K, Yoshimoto K, Terasaki H, Nomori H. The efficacy of epidural analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized control study. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Oct;12(5):313-8.
PMID: 17095972BACKGROUNDFernandez MI, Martin-Ucar AE, Lee HD, West KJ, Wyatt R, Waller DA. Does a thoracic epidural confer any additional benefit following video-assisted thoracoscopic pleurectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Apr;27(4):671-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.045.
PMID: 15784372BACKGROUNDHolm JH, Andersen C, Licht PB, Toft P, Zegers FD, Lambertsen KL, Brochner AC. Immunological effects of post-operative epidural analgesia versus oral opioids in VATS. Dan Med J. 2024 Sep 9;71(10):A09230582. doi: 10.61409/A09230582.
PMID: 39323258DERIVEDHolm JH, Andersen C, Toft P. Epidural analgesia versus oral morphine for postoperative pain management following video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomised, controlled, double-blind trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024 Jan 1;41(1):61-69. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001921. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
PMID: 37962202DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jimmy H Holm, MD
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care - Odense University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2015
First Posted
February 9, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 24, 2019
Study Completion
March 22, 2023
Last Updated
June 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share