NCT02358369

Brief Summary

The Bimatoprost Ocular Insert is intended to provide sustained delivery of bimatoprost to the ocular surface to lower the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of two different doses of the Bimatoprost Ocular Insert, compared to an active control arm with timolol ophthalmic solution (0.5%).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
156

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

10 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 19, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 21, 2015

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2015

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 7, 2015

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 4, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 4, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

January 21, 2015

Results QC Date

September 26, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 18, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 8

    IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Week 8. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement.

    Baseline (Day 0) to Week 8

  • Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 12

    IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Week 12. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement.

    Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

  • Percentage of Participants by Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Categories at Week 8

    BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved.

    Baseline (Day 0) to Week 8

  • Percentage of Participants by Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Categories at Week 12

    BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved.

    Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

  • Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Slit-Lamp Examination Findings at Week 12

    The clinician examined and graded the eyelids, conjunctiva, cornea and anterior chamber of the eye with the aid of a slit-lamp, (conjunctival erythema was assessed as part of the examination). Fluorescein dye was instilled into the ocular cul-de-sac to facilitate this examination.

    Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Automated Visual Field at Week 12

    Automated Visual Field was examined used the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, a test that measures the entire area of peripheral vision that can be seen while the eye is focused on a central point. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

  • Dilated Fundus Exam: Cup-to-Disc-Ratio

    The cup-to-disk-ratio is an eye test to assess the progression of glaucoma. The diameter of the cup is compared to the diameter of the disk and a ratio is determined. The normal cup-disk ratio is 0.3. An increase in the cup-to-disc-ratio is a possible indication of glaucoma.

    Week 12

  • Percentage of Participants by Dilated Fundus Exam Pathology Grade at Week 12

    Dilated fundus examination pathology findings were noted, described and graded on a scale of None (0), Mild (+1), Moderate (+2) and Severe (+3). The percentage of participants in each grade is reported.

    Week 12

  • Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events (AE) by Severity in Period A/B

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (eg, sign, symptom, disease, syndrome, intercurrent illness) that occurred in a study participant, regardless of the suspected cause during the study. An ocular AE is an AE that occurred in the eye and non-ocular is an AE that occurred not in the eye. Th investigator assessed the worst severity of each AE as: Mild=aware of sign or symptom, but readily tolerated, Moderate=discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity or Severe=incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity.

    Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

  • Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events (AE) by Severity in Period C

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (eg, sign, symptom, disease, syndrome, intercurrent illness) that occurred in a study participant, regardless of the suspected cause during the study. An ocular AE is an AE that occurred in the eye and non-ocular is an AE that occurred not in the eye. The investigator assessed the worst severity of each AE as: Mild=aware of sign or symptom, but readily tolerated, Moderate=discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity or Severe=incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity.

    Week 12 to Week 24

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 2

    Baseline (Day 0) to Week 2

  • Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 6

    Baseline (Day 0) to Week 6

  • Change From Baseline in IOP in Period C

    Baseline (Day 0) to Weeks 14, 18 and 24

Study Arms (3)

13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert

EXPERIMENTAL

Washout + Placebo Ocular Insert in each eye for 4 to 6 weeks, followed by 13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert in each eye (OU) for 12 weeks. Note: participants also self-administered placebo ophthalmic eye drops to each eye twice a day (BID) for the first 6 weeks. After 12 weeks, 13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert in each eye for an additional 12 weeks.

Drug: BimatoprostDevice: Placebo Ocular InsertDrug: Placebo Eye Drops

2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert

EXPERIMENTAL

Washout + Placebo Ocular Insert in each eye for 4 to 6 weeks, followed by 2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert in each eye for 12 weeks. Note: participants also self-administered placebo ophthalmic eye drops in each eye twice a day for the first 6 weeks. After 12 weeks, 13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert in each eye for an additional 12 weeks.

Drug: BimatoprostDevice: Placebo Ocular InsertDrug: Placebo Eye Drops

Timolol 0.5%

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Washout + Placebo Ocular Insert in each eye for 4 to 6 weeks, followed by 0.5% timolol ophthalmic solution in each eye for 6 weeks. Note: participants simultaneously wore placebo ocular inserts for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, 13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert in each eye for an additional 12 weeks.

Drug: BimatoprostDrug: Timolol 0.5%Device: Placebo Ocular Insert

Interventions

Bimatoprost sustained release Ocular Insert

13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular InsertTimolol 0.5%

BID drops OU, 0.5% ophthalmic solution

Timolol 0.5%

Placebo ocular insert OU.

13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular InsertTimolol 0.5%

Placebo eye drops BID OU.

13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Written informed consent
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Diagnosis in both eyes of either primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension
  • Best corrected-distance visual acuity score equivalent to 20/80 or better
  • Stable visual field
  • Central corneal thickness between 490 - 620 micrometers
  • ("T" is defined as time and "hr" is defined as hour\[s\])
  • IOP for each eye is ≥ 23 mm Hg at T=0 hr, ≥ 20 mm Hg at T=2 hr and T=8 hr.
  • Inter-eye IOP difference of ≤ 5.0 mm Hg at T=0 hr, T=2 hr and T=8 hr.
  • IOP for each eye is ≤ 30 mm Hg at T=0 hr, T=2 hr and T=8 hr.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any known contraindication to prostaglandin analog (latanoprost, travoprost, bimatoprost, tafluprost) or timolol
  • A cardiac or pulmonary condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would contraindicate the use of beta-blocker drops
  • Cup-to-disc ratio of greater than 0.8
  • Significant risk of angle closure due to pupil dilation, defined as a Shaffer classification of less than Grade 2 based on gonioscopy
  • Ocular, orbital, and/or eyelid surgery of any type within the past six (6) months from screening date
  • Laser surgery for glaucoma / ocular hypertension on one (1) or both eyes within the last six (6) months
  • Past history of any incisional surgery for glaucoma at any time
  • Past history of corneal refractive surgery
  • Corneal abnormalities that would interfere with accurate IOP readings with an applanation tonometer
  • Current participation in an investigational drug or device study or participation in such a study within 30 days of Screening
  • Inability to adequately evaluate the retina
  • Participants who will require contact lens use during the study period.
  • Participants who currently have punctal occlusion
  • Pregnant, lactating or of child-bearing potential and not using a medically acceptable form of birth control

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

Vold Vision

Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72704, United States

Location

Sall Medical Research Center

Artesia, California, 90701, United States

Location

Eye Research Foundation

Newport Beach, California, 92663, United States

Location

Clayton Eye Center

Morrow, Georgia, 30260, United States

Location

Mundorf Eye Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States

Location

Cornerstone Health Care

High Point, North Carolina, 27262, United States

Location

Apex Eye

Madeira, Ohio, 45243, United States

Location

University of Eye Specialists

Maryville, Tennessee, 37803, United States

Location

Total Eye Care

Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States

Location

R&R Eye Research, LLC

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Open-AngleOcular Hypertension

Interventions

Bimatoprost

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

GlaucomaEye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AmidesOrganic ChemicalsCloprostenolProstaglandins F, SyntheticProstaglandins, SyntheticProstaglandinsEicosanoidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipidsAutacoidsInflammation MediatorsBiological Factors

Results Point of Contact

Title
Therapeutic Area Head,
Organization
Allergan, Inc

Study Officials

  • Michelle Chen, PhD

    Allergan

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2015

First Posted

February 9, 2015

Study Start

January 19, 2015

Primary Completion

August 31, 2015

Study Completion

October 7, 2015

Last Updated

June 4, 2020

Results First Posted

June 4, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Locations