Dose-Ranging Study of the Bimatoprost Ocular Insert
A Phase 2 Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety and Dose-response of the Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (2.2 mg, 13 mg) With and Without Concomitant Artificial Tears Compared to a Placebo Ocular Insert With and Without Concomitant Timolol (0.5%) Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
1 other identifier
interventional
156
1 country
10
Brief Summary
The Bimatoprost Ocular Insert is intended to provide sustained delivery of bimatoprost to the ocular surface to lower the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of two different doses of the Bimatoprost Ocular Insert, compared to an active control arm with timolol ophthalmic solution (0.5%).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jan 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 19, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 7, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 4, 2020
CompletedJune 4, 2020
May 1, 2020
7 months
January 21, 2015
September 26, 2018
May 18, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 8
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Week 8. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement.
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 8
Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 12
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Week 12. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement.
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12
Percentage of Participants by Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Categories at Week 8
BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved.
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 8
Percentage of Participants by Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Categories at Week 12
BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved.
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Slit-Lamp Examination Findings at Week 12
The clinician examined and graded the eyelids, conjunctiva, cornea and anterior chamber of the eye with the aid of a slit-lamp, (conjunctival erythema was assessed as part of the examination). Fluorescein dye was instilled into the ocular cul-de-sac to facilitate this examination.
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Automated Visual Field at Week 12
Automated Visual Field was examined used the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, a test that measures the entire area of peripheral vision that can be seen while the eye is focused on a central point. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12
Dilated Fundus Exam: Cup-to-Disc-Ratio
The cup-to-disk-ratio is an eye test to assess the progression of glaucoma. The diameter of the cup is compared to the diameter of the disk and a ratio is determined. The normal cup-disk ratio is 0.3. An increase in the cup-to-disc-ratio is a possible indication of glaucoma.
Week 12
Percentage of Participants by Dilated Fundus Exam Pathology Grade at Week 12
Dilated fundus examination pathology findings were noted, described and graded on a scale of None (0), Mild (+1), Moderate (+2) and Severe (+3). The percentage of participants in each grade is reported.
Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events (AE) by Severity in Period A/B
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (eg, sign, symptom, disease, syndrome, intercurrent illness) that occurred in a study participant, regardless of the suspected cause during the study. An ocular AE is an AE that occurred in the eye and non-ocular is an AE that occurred not in the eye. Th investigator assessed the worst severity of each AE as: Mild=aware of sign or symptom, but readily tolerated, Moderate=discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity or Severe=incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity.
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events (AE) by Severity in Period C
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (eg, sign, symptom, disease, syndrome, intercurrent illness) that occurred in a study participant, regardless of the suspected cause during the study. An ocular AE is an AE that occurred in the eye and non-ocular is an AE that occurred not in the eye. The investigator assessed the worst severity of each AE as: Mild=aware of sign or symptom, but readily tolerated, Moderate=discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity or Severe=incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity.
Week 12 to Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 2
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 2
Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 6
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 6
Change From Baseline in IOP in Period C
Baseline (Day 0) to Weeks 14, 18 and 24
Study Arms (3)
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert
EXPERIMENTALWashout + Placebo Ocular Insert in each eye for 4 to 6 weeks, followed by 13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert in each eye (OU) for 12 weeks. Note: participants also self-administered placebo ophthalmic eye drops to each eye twice a day (BID) for the first 6 weeks. After 12 weeks, 13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert in each eye for an additional 12 weeks.
2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert
EXPERIMENTALWashout + Placebo Ocular Insert in each eye for 4 to 6 weeks, followed by 2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert in each eye for 12 weeks. Note: participants also self-administered placebo ophthalmic eye drops in each eye twice a day for the first 6 weeks. After 12 weeks, 13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert in each eye for an additional 12 weeks.
Timolol 0.5%
ACTIVE COMPARATORWashout + Placebo Ocular Insert in each eye for 4 to 6 weeks, followed by 0.5% timolol ophthalmic solution in each eye for 6 weeks. Note: participants simultaneously wore placebo ocular inserts for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, 13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert in each eye for an additional 12 weeks.
Interventions
Bimatoprost sustained release Ocular Insert
Placebo ocular insert OU.
Placebo eye drops BID OU.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent
- At least 18 years of age
- Diagnosis in both eyes of either primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension
- Best corrected-distance visual acuity score equivalent to 20/80 or better
- Stable visual field
- Central corneal thickness between 490 - 620 micrometers
- ("T" is defined as time and "hr" is defined as hour\[s\])
- IOP for each eye is ≥ 23 mm Hg at T=0 hr, ≥ 20 mm Hg at T=2 hr and T=8 hr.
- Inter-eye IOP difference of ≤ 5.0 mm Hg at T=0 hr, T=2 hr and T=8 hr.
- IOP for each eye is ≤ 30 mm Hg at T=0 hr, T=2 hr and T=8 hr.
You may not qualify if:
- Any known contraindication to prostaglandin analog (latanoprost, travoprost, bimatoprost, tafluprost) or timolol
- A cardiac or pulmonary condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would contraindicate the use of beta-blocker drops
- Cup-to-disc ratio of greater than 0.8
- Significant risk of angle closure due to pupil dilation, defined as a Shaffer classification of less than Grade 2 based on gonioscopy
- Ocular, orbital, and/or eyelid surgery of any type within the past six (6) months from screening date
- Laser surgery for glaucoma / ocular hypertension on one (1) or both eyes within the last six (6) months
- Past history of any incisional surgery for glaucoma at any time
- Past history of corneal refractive surgery
- Corneal abnormalities that would interfere with accurate IOP readings with an applanation tonometer
- Current participation in an investigational drug or device study or participation in such a study within 30 days of Screening
- Inability to adequately evaluate the retina
- Participants who will require contact lens use during the study period.
- Participants who currently have punctal occlusion
- Pregnant, lactating or of child-bearing potential and not using a medically acceptable form of birth control
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Vold Vision
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72704, United States
Sall Medical Research Center
Artesia, California, 90701, United States
Eye Research Foundation
Newport Beach, California, 92663, United States
Clayton Eye Center
Morrow, Georgia, 30260, United States
Mundorf Eye Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
Cornerstone Health Care
High Point, North Carolina, 27262, United States
Apex Eye
Madeira, Ohio, 45243, United States
University of Eye Specialists
Maryville, Tennessee, 37803, United States
Total Eye Care
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States
R&R Eye Research, LLC
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head,
- Organization
- Allergan, Inc
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Michelle Chen, PhD
Allergan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2015
First Posted
February 9, 2015
Study Start
January 19, 2015
Primary Completion
August 31, 2015
Study Completion
October 7, 2015
Last Updated
June 4, 2020
Results First Posted
June 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05