Effects of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Recurrent UTI in Children
Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Children: Bacterial Identification, Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling and Cytokine Levels Associated With Antibiotic Prophylaxis
1 other identifier
interventional
59
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Approximately, 3% of males and 8% of females will develop a urinary tract infection (UTI) during childhood, and most of these will be effectively treated by short-term antibiotic therapy. A subset of these children (20-48%), will develop recurrent UTI (RUTI), which may have long-term effects in the form of hypertension or renal damage. In an effort to prevent RUTIs physicians prescribe sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (Septra) or nitrofurantoin as low dose antibiotic prophylaxis. However, recent evidence suggests that during prophylactic therapy the body is exposed to antibiotic levels capable of increasing antibiotic resistance and bacterial virulence. This has been shown to be true in the uropathogens E. coli and Staphylococcus saprophyticus, yet it is not known if Enterococcus sp. demonstrate similar mechanisms. Additionally, antibiotics have been shown to disrupt the natural balance of the human microbiome, potentially leading to major long term problems. As a uropathogen, enterococci consistently rank in the top 3 causes of RUTI, especially in children under 3 years of age. Additionally, Enterococcus is notorious for developing antibiotic resistance and studies have shown that children with enterococcal UTIs exhibit a higher rate of recurrence than those with non-enterococcal UTIs. The investigators hypothesize the current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis in children with RUTI is detrimental and can change the bacterial and sensitivity profiles of these patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Sep 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 14, 2019
CompletedSeptember 21, 2021
September 1, 2015
3.3 years
February 3, 2015
September 23, 2019
August 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes to the Urinary Microbiota
Changes to the urinary microbiota were measured as changes in the colony forming units (CFUs) of Enterococcus sp., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella sp./Enterobacter sp., Staphylococcus saprophyticus, or Pseudomonas sp./Staphylococcus aureus when the participant urine was cultured on CHROMagar Orientation. The data was analyzed in terms of bacterial counts, presence/absence, and presence at or above the diagnostic threshold for UTI (10\^5 CFU/mL of one species). Here we present participant midstream urine samples that met the diagnostic threshold for UTI at baseline.
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Changes to Metabolic Profiles of Urine
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- 12-months
Changes to Antibiotic Susceptibility
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-months
Changes in Pro-inflammatory Cytokines
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-months
Study Arms (3)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with RUTI receiving Septra (Trimethoprim dose 2mg/kg) or nitrofurantoin (dose 2 mg/kg) as determined by clinician.
Healthy Population
NO INTERVENTIONHealthy population
Clinical Observation
NO INTERVENTIONPatients experiencing RUTI that do not require antibiotic prophylaxis as determined by clinician.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with an abnormal urinary tract as determined through the use of ultrasound and, given an abnormal ultrasound, or greater than two febrile UTIs, a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). The use of both ultrasound and VCUG given these indications is standard of care.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital - London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Whiteside SA, Dave S, Seney SL, Wang P, Reid G, Burton JP. Enterococcus faecalis persistence in pediatric patients treated with antibiotic prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infections. Future Microbiol. 2018 Aug;13:1095-1115. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2018-0048. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
PMID: 30132694DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Sumit Dave
- Organization
- London Health Sciences Centre
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sumit Dave, MD, MCh
Assistant Professor, Pediatric Urologist, London Health Sciences Centre
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2015
First Posted
February 6, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 21, 2021
Results First Posted
October 14, 2019
Record last verified: 2015-09