Study Stopped
Slower than expected recruitment rate, and larger than expected required sample.
The Effect of Episiotomy on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes (EPITRIAL)
The Effect of Episiotomy on Advanced Perineal Tears and Other Maternal and Fetal Outcomes - Randomized Controlled Multicentric Trial (EPITRIAL)
1 other identifier
interventional
676
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is aimed to evaluate the influence of episiotomy on various maternal and neonatal outcomes. Half of the participants will undergo selective episiotomy (according to routine delivery management at the particular hospital), while the other half will not undergo epitiotomy at all. Our hypothesis is that no differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes will be demonstrated between these two groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 6, 2018
CompletedFebruary 5, 2020
February 1, 2020
2.9 years
February 1, 2015
February 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Obstetric Anal Sphincter injury
Advanced (3rd and 4th degree) perineal tears, i.e. perineal lacerations involving the anal sphincter, diagnosed by a senior obstetrician
From the delivery to one hour after delivery
Secondary Outcomes (13)
1st and 2nd degree perineal tears
From the delivery to one hour after delivery
Duration of the second stage of labor
From beginning of full dilatation to the delivery of the baby
Postpartum hemorrhage
From delivery to one hour postpartum
Neonatal Apgar score
From the delivery to five minutes after delivery
Cord blood pH
From the delivery to first two minutes after delivery
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
No episiotomy
EXPERIMENTALEpisiotomy will not be performed in this group. Deviation from protocol (i.e. episiotomy performance) will be allowed only according to the discretion of obstetrician in charge of the delivery, in cases of unequivocal benefit to the fetus.
Selective episiotomy
NO INTERVENTIONThe decision to perform episiotomy in this group will be based on routine delivery care, i.e. indistinguishable from any other delivery not participating in the trial.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women in labor, or women scheduled for induction of labor, or women attending for a routine follow-up examination during third trimester of pregnancy.
- First vaginal delivery
- Singleton pregnancy above 34 gestational weeks
- Vertex presentation
- Women who are able to understand and sign the informed consent forms.
You may not qualify if:
- Absolute contraindications for vaginal delivery (e.g. placenta previa, fetal macrosomia above 4.5 kg, genital herpes)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lena Sagi-Dainlead
- Bnai Zion Medical Centercollaborator
- Rambam Health Care Campuscollaborator
- Hillel Yaffe Medical Centercollaborator
- Ziv Medical Centercollaborator
- The Baruch Padeh Medical Center, Poriyacollaborator
- Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariyacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Bnai Zion Medical Center
Haifa, Israel
Related Publications (3)
Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2.
PMID: 19160176BACKGROUNDPergialiotis V, Vlachos D, Protopapas A, Pappa K, Vlachos G. Risk factors for severe perineal lacerations during childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Apr;125(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.09.034. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
PMID: 24529800BACKGROUNDSagi-Dain L, Kreinin-Bleicher I, Bahous R, Gur Arye N, Shema T, Eshel A, Caspin O, Gonen R, Sagi S. Is it time to abandon episiotomy use? A randomized controlled trial (EPITRIAL). Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Nov;31(11):2377-2385. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04332-2. Epub 2020 May 24.
PMID: 32448935DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shlomi Sagi, M.D.
Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Reuven Keidar, M.D.
Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ido Solt, M.D.
Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Asnat Walfisch, M.D.
Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dmitry Chuyun, M.D.
The Baruch Padeh Medical Center, Poriya, Israel
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Peleg, M.D.
Ziv Medical Center, Tzfat, Israel
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oleg Shnaider, M.D.
Western Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Obstetrician, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2015
First Posted
February 5, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 6, 2018
Study Completion
May 6, 2018
Last Updated
February 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share