Perception of Inappropriate CPR: a Multicenter International Cross-sectional Survey
REAppropriate
The REAppropriate Study: Perception of Inappropriate CPR: a Multicenter International Cross-sectional Survey
1 other identifier
observational
5,882
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to determine how often cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is perceived as inappropriate by Healthcare Providers (HCPs) working in prehospital Ambulance Services and Emergency Departments. Perception of inappropriate CPR is defined as resuscitation efforts perceived by HCPs as disproportionate to the expected prognosis of the patient in terms of survival or quality of life. When a HCP perceives CPR as inappropriate, this may cause moral and emotional distress. This perception may be modulated by the personal background and professional role of the HCP, but also by his/her working conditions. Apart from the workload, the resulting distress can be influenced by the way non-technical skills are developed within the team and the ethical environment in which the HCP functions. Frequent exposure to similar patient care situations and/or a professional environment not acknowledging the distress may lead to deficient coping mechanisms and accumulation of moral distress. This may be associated with job leave, burnout and a decreased quality of patient care. Acute distress may also influence the quality of care provided to actual and future patients. Secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate whether perceived inappropriateness of CPR is not only associated with patient related factors but also with personal characteristics and work related factors. Potential consequences for HCP's like moral distress and intentional job leave will be assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2015
Shorter than P25 for all trials
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2015
CompletedMay 17, 2018
May 1, 2018
8 months
January 14, 2015
May 16, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The number of Healthcare Providers (HCPs) reporting Perceived Inappropriateness of CPR (PICPR) in the last cardiac arrest situation attended divided by the total number of surveyed HCPs
2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Moral distress and intentional job leave associated with Perceived Inappropriateness of CPR (PICPR)
2 weeks
Study Arms (1)
EMS Healthcare Providers
Healthcare Providers working in Emergency Medical Services and directly involved in treatment of cardiac arrest patients (out-of-hospital or in the Emergency Department)
Eligibility Criteria
The survey will focus on Healthcare Providers (HCPs) directly involved in treatment of cardiac arrest patients (out-of-hospital or in the Emergency Department (ED)): nurses, doctors, ED Technicians/Nurse Assistants and Emergency Medical Technicians(EMT)/Paramedics working in EDs and prehospital Ambulance Services active in the Emergency Medical Services system of the country. Hospitals in countries without established EDs but with a group of HCPs working inside the hospital and having as their daily duty the first care and stabilisation of patients arriving unplanned in the hospital are also eligible for participation in the study. The Local Investigator will clearly delineate this functional unit within the hospital thus determining the number of eligible HCPs within the center.
You may qualify if:
- Healthcare Provider working in Emergency Department or Ambulance Service directly involved in treatment of cardiac arrest patients
You may not qualify if:
- Healthcare Provider working in Emergency Department or Ambulance Service not directly involved in treatment of cardiac arrest patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
UMC Sint-Pieter
Brussels, 1000, Belgium
UVC Brugmann
Brussels, 1020, Belgium
Groupe Jolimont
Haine-Saint-Paul, 7100, Belgium
CHU Tivoli
La Louvière, 7100, Belgium
CHU Vesale Charleroi
Montigny-le-Tilleul, 6110, Belgium
Related Publications (4)
Marco CA, Bessman ES, Kelen GD. Ethical issues of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: comparison of emergency physician practices from 1995 to 2007. Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Mar;16(3):270-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00348.x. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
PMID: 19183108RESULTMarco CA, Schears RM. Prehospital resuscitation practices: a survey of prehospital providers. J Emerg Med. 2003 Jan;24(1):101-6. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(02)00688-1.
PMID: 12554050RESULTPartridge RA, Virk A, Sayah A, Antosia R. Field experience with prehospital advance directives. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;32(5):589-93. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70038-1.
PMID: 9795323RESULTDruwe P, Monsieurs KG, Gagg J, Nakahara S, Cocchi MN, Elo G, van Schuppen H, Alpert EA, Truhlar A, Huybrechts SA, Mpotos N, Paal P, BjOrshol C, Xanthos T, Joly LM, Roessler M, Deasy C, Svavarsdottir H, Nurmi J, Owczuk R, Salmeron PP, Cimpoesu D, Fuenzalida PA, Raffay V, Steen J, Decruyenaere J, De Paepe P, Piers R, Benoit DD; REAPPROPRIATE study group. Impact of perceived inappropiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation on emergency clinicians' intention to leave the job: Results from a cross-sectional survey in 288 centres across 24 countries. Resuscitation. 2021 Jan;158:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.043. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
PMID: 33227397DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrick M Druwé, MD
University Hospital, Ghent
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2015
First Posted
February 5, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
November 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 17, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05