Paracervical Block for Pain Control With Osmotic Dilator Placement
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Cervical dilators are frequently used for preparation prior to second trimester surgical abortion. While their use decreases complications associated with surgical abortion, their placement is often uncomfortable for the patient. Currently there are no proven methods for reducing pain during osmotic dilator placement. The use of numbing medication around the cervix (paracervical block) may decrease this placement pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 2, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 25, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 25, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 11, 2019
CompletedJune 11, 2019
May 1, 2019
5 months
January 29, 2015
September 24, 2018
May 21, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain at Time of Osmotic Dilator Placement
Measure of distance (mm) from the left ("no pain") on the 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS - reflecting magnitude of pain) recorded at time immediately after osmotic dilator placement. 0 mm=No Pain and 100 mm= worst possible pain. A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
Within 5 minutes of PCB or sham procedure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pain With Paracervical Block or Sham
Within 5 minutes after baseline
Reported Pain at Baseline
Baseline, just prior to PCB or sham procedure
Pain With Overall Dilator Placement
15 minutes after dilator placement
Study Arms (2)
Sham Group
SHAM COMPARATORThis non-intervention group will receive the sham paracervical block. This intervention will include * Preprocedural pain control: 800 mg Ibuprofen prior to dilator placement * Local anesthetic for tenaculum placement * Sham Paracervical Block done with capped spinal needle * osmotic dilators placed in the usual fashion * postprocedural assessment
Paracervical Block Group
EXPERIMENTALThis intervention group will receive the paracervical block. This intervention will include * Preprocedural pain control: 800 mg Ibuprofen prior to dilator placement * Local anesthetic for tenaculum placement * 18 ml 1% buffered lidocaine Paracervical Block * osmotic dilators placed in the usual fashion * postprocedural assessment
Interventions
2 mL of buffered Lidocaine injected superficially at anterior lip of cervix in 12 o'clock position Drug: 1% Lidocaine Hydrochloride, 8.4% Sodium Bicarbonate
Over 60 seconds, without moving the tenaculum, a capped needle gently touches the vaginal sidewall at the level of the external os at 4 and 8 o'clock positions
18 mL of buffered Lidocaine is slowly injected into the vaginal fornices and equally distributed at 4 and 8 o'clock. The injection is continuous from superficial to deep (3cm) to superficial (injecting with insertion and withdrawal) Drug: 1% Lidocaine Hydrochloride, 8.4% Sodium Bicarbonate
Osmotic dilators will be placed in the usual fashion with a combination of Dilapan-S and laminaria per clinician preference Drugs: Dilapan-S is a hygroscopic cervical dilator made of a patented hydrogel called AQUACRYL. It is a rigid hydrophilic stick that increases in volume by absorbing fluids and comfortably dilating the cervix. Laminaria is an herbal medicine used to induce labor and abortion. The dried stem of Laminaria mechanically dilates the cervical opening by absorbing water and swelling to several times its original diameter.
15 minutes after procedure, subjects will complete a questionnaire that collects information about pain, negative symptoms, and assessment of how effective their pain management was.
800 mg Ibuprofen taken before dilator placement
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- voluntarily seeking surgical pregnancy termination
- gestational age on day of study 14w0d to 23w6d confirmed by pelvic ultrasound with a viable pregnancy (no fetal demise diagnosed)
- eligible for second trimester D\&E
- having osmotic dilators placed for cervical preparation the day prior to D\&E
- able and willing to give informed consent and agree to terms of the study
- able to speak and read English or Spanish
You may not qualify if:
- took any prescription or illegal drugs 24 hours prior to the appointment
- drank alcohol 12 hours prior to the appointment
- took any over the counter pain medications 12 hours prior to the appointment other than the standard 800mg of Ibuprofen
- contraindications to osmotic dilators
- allergic reaction or hypersensitivity to NSAIDs or lidocaine
- untreated acute cervicitis or pelvic inflammatory disease
- weight \<100 pounds
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest: First Avenue Family Planning Michelle Wagner Center
San Diego, California, 92101, United States
UCSD Medical Offices South: Women's Health Services
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Related Publications (9)
Glantz JC, Shomento S. Comparison of paracervical block techniques during first trimester pregnancy termination. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Feb;72(2):171-8. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)00292-7.
PMID: 11166751BACKGROUNDJensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8.
PMID: 14622683BACKGROUNDJones RK, Zolna MR, Henshaw SK, Finer LB. Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008 Mar;40(1):6-16. doi: 10.1363/4000608.
PMID: 18318867BACKGROUNDPeterson WF, Berry FN, Grace MR, Gulbranson CL. Second-trimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation: an analysis of 11,747 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Aug;62(2):185-90.
PMID: 6866362BACKGROUNDCansino C, Edelman A, Burke A, Jamshidi R. Paracervical block with combined ketorolac and lidocaine in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1220-1226. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c1a55b.
PMID: 19935022BACKGROUNDRowbotham MC. What is a "clinically meaningful" reduction in pain? Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):131-132. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00371-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 11690725BACKGROUNDSchulz KF, Grimes DA, Cates W Jr. Measures to prevent cervical injury during suction curettage abortion. Lancet. 1983 May 28;1(8335):1182-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92464-9.
PMID: 6133988BACKGROUNDStrauss LT, Gamble SB, Parker WY, Cook DA, Zane SB, Hamdan S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Abortion surveillance--United States, 2003. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006 Nov 24;55(11):1-32.
PMID: 17119534BACKGROUNDTodd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):485-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70238-x.
PMID: 8604867BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ob/Gyn Regulatory Specialist, Women's Health Research Unit
- Organization
- Oregon Health & Science University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lisa Bayer, MD MPH
UCSD Department of Reproductive Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sheila Mody, MD MPH
UCSD Department of Reproductive Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kelly Culwell, MD MPH
Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2015
First Posted
February 3, 2015
Study Start
April 2, 2015
Primary Completion
August 25, 2015
Study Completion
August 25, 2015
Last Updated
June 11, 2019
Results First Posted
June 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05