NCT02352519

Brief Summary

In this research study, the investigators are trying to find out which of the two methods of injecting local anesthetics (at the site of the belly button cut or by ultrasound guided rectus sheath block) will provide better pain relief and less need for pain medication after surgery in children undergoing single incision laparoscopic appendectomy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2011

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2011

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 24, 2014

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 2, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

July 21, 2015

Status Verified

July 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

July 24, 2014

Last Update Submit

July 20, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparing the amount of morphine used during the first 48 hurs after surgery

    48 hours

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Comparing pain scores during the first 48 hours after surgery

    48 hours

  • Comparing time to first rescue analgesia

    48 hours

  • Comparing rescue analgesia used in the Post Anesthetic Care Unit (PACU)

    48 hours

  • Comparing incidence of side effects of opioids such as respiratory depression, itching, nausea, and vomiting, dysphoria

    48 hours

  • Comparing time to achieving discharge readiness in PACU

    48 hours

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

UGBRSB

EXPERIMENTAL

Under sterile conditions,the posterior rectus sheath will be identified by ultrasound, and an insulated 22 gauge 50 mm needle inserted till the tip is seen to be directly between the rectus abdominis muscle and the posterior rectus sheath. Bupivacaine 0.25% (0.2 ml/kg with maximum 5 ml in each side) will be injected observing the spread on the ultrasound image.

Procedure: UGBRSB

Local infiltration

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In those patients randomized to the LAI group, the surgeon will perform infiltration of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine (maximum, 10 ml) around the incision.

Procedure: Local Infiltration

Interventions

UGBRSBPROCEDURE

Under sterile conditions,the posterior rectus sheath will be identified by ultrasound, and an insulated 22 gauge 50 mm needle inserted till the tip is seen to be directly between the rectus abdominis muscle and the posterior rectus sheath. Bupivacaine 0.25% (0.2 ml/kg with maximum 5 ml in each side) will be injected observing the spread on the ultrasound image.

Also known as: Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block
UGBRSB

In those patients randomized to the LAI group, the surgeon will perform infiltration of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine (maximum, 10 ml) around the incision

Also known as: Local Anesthetic Infiltration
Local infiltration

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • \) Acute appendicitis (2) Age 6 - 17 years (3) American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I - III (4) Patients undergoing SILA procedure performed by a single pediatric surgeon (Dr. Ashwin P. Pimpalwar) (5) Patients judged by parents, physicians and other caretakers as being capable of using the patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device.

You may not qualify if:

  • \) Patients who are not scheduled to undergo the procedure of SILA. (2) Patients with allergies to local anesthetics (3) Patients who do not understand or cannot use the pain rating scale because of developmental delay, language or other issues. (4) Patients with concomitant major cardio-respiratory disorders. (5) Patients judged to be incapable of using the PCA device (6) Patients who refuse to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Texas Children's Hospital

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Appendicitis

Interventions

Anesthesia, Local

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intraabdominal InfectionsInfectionsGastroenteritisGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesCecal DiseasesIntestinal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Officials

  • Yang Liu, M.D>

    Baylor College of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Pediatric Anesthesiologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2014

First Posted

February 2, 2015

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion

June 1, 2015

Study Completion

June 1, 2015

Last Updated

July 21, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-07

Locations