NCT02352441

Brief Summary

Many Service members (SM) experience executive dysfunction associated with mild traumatic brain injury symptom complex (mTBI-sc), for which they receive cognitive rehabilitation. Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) for executive dysfunction often involves metacognitive strategy instruction (MSI) to help patients self-regulate their behavior though a goal management process - identifying a goal, anticipating performance problems, generating possible solutions, self-monitoring performance during the activity, recognizing maladaptive task strategies, stopping and then modifying real-time task behavior by choosing an alternate strategy. MSI alone often does not result in improved daily functioning because it requires conscious cognitive oversight to employ (which is difficult for people with executive dysfunction) and it presumes that simply establishing goals propels goal-directed action, when for many people, this is not so. Social psychologists report that people who set implementation intentions (if-then statements that link specific situational cues with specific goal actions) are more likely to perform goal actions than those who only set goal intentions. Implementation intentions are believed to be effective because they enable people to switch from conscious-effortful reflective action control to automatic, reflexive action control associated with selected situational cues. A team of researchers from the Courage Kenny Research Center (CKRC), Traumatic Brain Injury Center at Fort Campbell, KY (TBIC-FC), and Neurofunctional Research and Consulting has developed a brief CR intervention to teach SM with mTBI-sc to set implementation intentions called ACTION (AutomatiC iniTiation of IntentiONs) sequence training. The purpose of this pilot study to evaluate: 1) the practicality of instructional methods used to teach SM with mTBI-sc to perform the ACTION sequence and 2) the efficacy of ACTION sequence training in achieving personal goals and performance on a task that challenges executive function using a small randomized controlled trial. If the results are positive, a larger study would be conducted to determine the impact of ACTION sequence training on SM performance on military-relevant tasks and goals.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 23, 2015

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 2, 2015

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 29, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 29, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

January 11, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

January 23, 2015

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in performance of the Hotel Task

    The Hotel Task requires the participant to perform a set of 6 tasks in 10 minutes with the instruction to perform all tasks with no expectation for completing any of the tasks. This task tests the ability of the participant to shift. Measurements associated with this task include time spent on each task and number of tasks completed.

    Baseline and end of 3 weeks

  • Change in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

    Participants will provide their self-perceived performance on three everyday tasks identified and prioritized as problematic.

    Baseline and end of 3 weeks

  • Change in Goal Attainment Scaling

    Attainment of five goals linked to selected five everyday tasks

    Baseline and end of 3 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Performance of assigned tasks given at the end of each of the 6 II sessions

    End of sessions 1 and 2 for each of weeks 1, 2, and 3

  • Performance of homework

    4 days / week for each of the 3 weeks of study participation

Study Arms (2)

Implementation Intentions

EXPERIMENTAL

This group will receive training in Implementation Intentions during 3 sessions, 1 day/week, over 3 weeks. They will receive usual care through the standard program, 1 day/week during these 3 weeks.

Other: Implementation Intentions(II)

Usual Care

NO INTERVENTION

This group will participate in the usual group intervention provided to Service members experiencing executive dysfunction associated with mild traumatic brain injury, 2 days / week during 3 weeks.

Interventions

Implementation Intention training will include: Demonstration and practice using examples and personal goals identified at first session. Worksheets will be provided to practice IF-THEN statements to set Implementation Intentions. Additionally, at the end of each session, the participant will be instructed to perform and event based or time based task. The objective is to see if those receiving II training are more likely to carry out the assigned task than those who do not receive II training. They will also be expected to practice II at least 5 days/week using personal goals.

Implementation Intentions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fort Campbell Intrepid Spirit

Fort Campbell North, Kentucky, 42223, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Radomski MV, Giles GM, Owens J, Showers M, Rabusch S, Kreiger R, Zola J, Kath K. Can service members with mild traumatic brain injury learn to develop implementation intentions for self-identified goals? Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2640-2647. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1841309. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain InjuriesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Mary Radomski, OTR/L, PhD

    Allina Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mark Showers, MS, OTR/L

    Fort Campbell

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Scientific Advisor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2015

First Posted

February 2, 2015

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

September 29, 2017

Study Completion

September 29, 2017

Last Updated

January 11, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations