Cognitive Rehabilitation:ACTION Training for Soldiers With Executive Dysfunction
ACTION
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many Service members (SM) experience executive dysfunction associated with mild traumatic brain injury symptom complex (mTBI-sc), for which they receive cognitive rehabilitation. Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) for executive dysfunction often involves metacognitive strategy instruction (MSI) to help patients self-regulate their behavior though a goal management process - identifying a goal, anticipating performance problems, generating possible solutions, self-monitoring performance during the activity, recognizing maladaptive task strategies, stopping and then modifying real-time task behavior by choosing an alternate strategy. MSI alone often does not result in improved daily functioning because it requires conscious cognitive oversight to employ (which is difficult for people with executive dysfunction) and it presumes that simply establishing goals propels goal-directed action, when for many people, this is not so. Social psychologists report that people who set implementation intentions (if-then statements that link specific situational cues with specific goal actions) are more likely to perform goal actions than those who only set goal intentions. Implementation intentions are believed to be effective because they enable people to switch from conscious-effortful reflective action control to automatic, reflexive action control associated with selected situational cues. A team of researchers from the Courage Kenny Research Center (CKRC), Traumatic Brain Injury Center at Fort Campbell, KY (TBIC-FC), and Neurofunctional Research and Consulting has developed a brief CR intervention to teach SM with mTBI-sc to set implementation intentions called ACTION (AutomatiC iniTiation of IntentiONs) sequence training. The purpose of this pilot study to evaluate: 1) the practicality of instructional methods used to teach SM with mTBI-sc to perform the ACTION sequence and 2) the efficacy of ACTION sequence training in achieving personal goals and performance on a task that challenges executive function using a small randomized controlled trial. If the results are positive, a larger study would be conducted to determine the impact of ACTION sequence training on SM performance on military-relevant tasks and goals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 29, 2017
CompletedJanuary 11, 2018
January 1, 2018
1.3 years
January 23, 2015
January 9, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in performance of the Hotel Task
The Hotel Task requires the participant to perform a set of 6 tasks in 10 minutes with the instruction to perform all tasks with no expectation for completing any of the tasks. This task tests the ability of the participant to shift. Measurements associated with this task include time spent on each task and number of tasks completed.
Baseline and end of 3 weeks
Change in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
Participants will provide their self-perceived performance on three everyday tasks identified and prioritized as problematic.
Baseline and end of 3 weeks
Change in Goal Attainment Scaling
Attainment of five goals linked to selected five everyday tasks
Baseline and end of 3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Performance of assigned tasks given at the end of each of the 6 II sessions
End of sessions 1 and 2 for each of weeks 1, 2, and 3
Performance of homework
4 days / week for each of the 3 weeks of study participation
Study Arms (2)
Implementation Intentions
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive training in Implementation Intentions during 3 sessions, 1 day/week, over 3 weeks. They will receive usual care through the standard program, 1 day/week during these 3 weeks.
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONThis group will participate in the usual group intervention provided to Service members experiencing executive dysfunction associated with mild traumatic brain injury, 2 days / week during 3 weeks.
Interventions
Implementation Intention training will include: Demonstration and practice using examples and personal goals identified at first session. Worksheets will be provided to practice IF-THEN statements to set Implementation Intentions. Additionally, at the end of each session, the participant will be instructed to perform and event based or time based task. The objective is to see if those receiving II training are more likely to carry out the assigned task than those who do not receive II training. They will also be expected to practice II at least 5 days/week using personal goals.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fort Campbell Intrepid Spirit
Fort Campbell North, Kentucky, 42223, United States
Related Publications (1)
Radomski MV, Giles GM, Owens J, Showers M, Rabusch S, Kreiger R, Zola J, Kath K. Can service members with mild traumatic brain injury learn to develop implementation intentions for self-identified goals? Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2640-2647. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1841309. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
PMID: 33147426DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mary Radomski, OTR/L, PhD
Allina Health
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Showers, MS, OTR/L
Fort Campbell
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Scientific Advisor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2015
First Posted
February 2, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 29, 2017
Study Completion
September 29, 2017
Last Updated
January 11, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share