Cataract Surgery: Femto LDV Z8 Versus Conventional
COMFORT
A Single Centre Randomized Eye Study to Compare the Performance and Safety of Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Procedures With Conventional Ultrasound-assisted Cataract Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
130
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to demonstrate the performance and safety of the Femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy and lens fragmentation on human eyes using the FEMTO LDV Z8 compared to conventional technique in cataract surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 28, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 23, 2019
CompletedOctober 23, 2019
September 1, 2019
1.9 years
January 16, 2015
June 29, 2017
September 30, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effective Phaco Time (EPT)
Effective Phacoemulsification Time (EPT): EPT for eyes receiving Intervention A being statistically same or lower than EPT for eyes receiving Intervention B at p\<0.05 will be considered positive for superior efficacy of application of FEMTO LDV Z8 over the manual procedure Effective Phaco Time is a unit. It is commonly understood in the area of cataract surgery to be the standard way to describe phaco energy during a procedure over different manufactured phaco devices. Effective phaco time is the total phaco time at 100 percent phaco power. It can be less than the total foot-pedal time. Less EPT indicates proportionately less energy delivered to the eye thereby reducing the side effects of phaco power.
day of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Ease of Phacoemulsification
during surgery
Number of Participants With Complete Treatment Pattern
during surgery
Other Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Reported Complications
during follow-up after 1 and 12 days, 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Femto LDV Z8
EXPERIMENTALFemtosecond laser-assisted cataract pre-treatment: Capsulotomy and lens fragmentation, followed by ultrasound phacoemulsification
Manual capsulorhexis&lens fragmentation
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Conventional group acts as a control group with conventional capsulorhexis and ultrasound phacoemulsification
Interventions
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract pre-treatment: Capsulotomy and lens fragmentation, followed by ultrasound phacoemulsification
Control treatment where the capsulorhexis is performed manually and the lens fragmentation is performed by the stop and chop technique with the phaco emulsification device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible to undergo cataract extraction by phacoemulsification with primary intraocular lens Implantation
- Able to co-operate with the docking system for the femtosecond laser
- Clear corneal media
- years of age or older
- Willing and able to return for scheduled follow-up examinations
You may not qualify if:
- Minimal and maximal K-values of the central 3mm zone that differ by more than 5D on a keratometric map of the cornea
- Maximum K-value that exceeds 58D
- Minimal K-value of less than 37D
- Corneal disease or pathology, such as corneal scaring or opacity, that precludes transmission of laser wavelength or that distorts laser light
- Poorly dilating pupil or other defect of the pupil that prevents the iris from adequate retraction peripherally
- Manifest Glaucoma+OHT (ocular hypertension), pseudoexfoliation
- Previous intraocular or corneal surgery of any kind, including any type of surgery for either refractive or therapeutic purposes in either eye
- Known sensitivity to planned concomitant medications
- History of lens or zonular instability
- Keratoconus or keratectasia
- Immune compromised or diagnosis of connective tissue disease, clinically sign. atopic disease, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, autoimmune diseases, ocular herpes zoster or simplex, endocrine diseases, lupus, RA, collagenosis and other acute or chronic illnesses that increases the risk to the subject or confounds the outcomes of this study, in the opinion of the study PI.
- Anterior chamber depth (ACD) \< 1.5 mm or ACD \> 4.8 mm as measured from the corneal endothelium.
- Extensive corneal scarring
- Developmental disability or cognitive impairment (would preclude adequate comprehension of the Informed Consent (IC) form and/or the ability to record the study measurements)
- Concurrent participation in another ophthalmological clinical study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sarah Moyle
- Organization
- Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bojan Pajic, MD, PhD
Augenzentrum ORASIS AG
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2015
First Posted
January 30, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 28, 2016
Study Completion
February 28, 2017
Last Updated
October 23, 2019
Results First Posted
October 23, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09