NCT02351271

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to demonstrate the performance and safety of the Femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy and lens fragmentation on human eyes using the FEMTO LDV Z8 compared to conventional technique in cataract surgery.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
130

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 16, 2015

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 30, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2015

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 28, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2017

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 23, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 23, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

January 16, 2015

Results QC Date

June 29, 2017

Last Update Submit

September 30, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Effective Phaco Time (EPT)

    Effective Phacoemulsification Time (EPT): EPT for eyes receiving Intervention A being statistically same or lower than EPT for eyes receiving Intervention B at p\<0.05 will be considered positive for superior efficacy of application of FEMTO LDV Z8 over the manual procedure Effective Phaco Time is a unit. It is commonly understood in the area of cataract surgery to be the standard way to describe phaco energy during a procedure over different manufactured phaco devices. Effective phaco time is the total phaco time at 100 percent phaco power. It can be less than the total foot-pedal time. Less EPT indicates proportionately less energy delivered to the eye thereby reducing the side effects of phaco power.

    day of surgery

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Ease of Phacoemulsification

    during surgery

  • Number of Participants With Complete Treatment Pattern

    during surgery

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With Reported Complications

    during follow-up after 1 and 12 days, 4, 8 and 12 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Femto LDV Z8

EXPERIMENTAL

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract pre-treatment: Capsulotomy and lens fragmentation, followed by ultrasound phacoemulsification

Device: Femto LDV Z8

Manual capsulorhexis&lens fragmentation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Conventional group acts as a control group with conventional capsulorhexis and ultrasound phacoemulsification

Device: Manual capsulorhexis&lens fragmentation

Interventions

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract pre-treatment: Capsulotomy and lens fragmentation, followed by ultrasound phacoemulsification

Also known as: Treatment A
Femto LDV Z8

Control treatment where the capsulorhexis is performed manually and the lens fragmentation is performed by the stop and chop technique with the phaco emulsification device

Also known as: Treatment B
Manual capsulorhexis&lens fragmentation

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Eligible to undergo cataract extraction by phacoemulsification with primary intraocular lens Implantation
  • Able to co-operate with the docking system for the femtosecond laser
  • Clear corneal media
  • years of age or older
  • Willing and able to return for scheduled follow-up examinations

You may not qualify if:

  • Minimal and maximal K-values of the central 3mm zone that differ by more than 5D on a keratometric map of the cornea
  • Maximum K-value that exceeds 58D
  • Minimal K-value of less than 37D
  • Corneal disease or pathology, such as corneal scaring or opacity, that precludes transmission of laser wavelength or that distorts laser light
  • Poorly dilating pupil or other defect of the pupil that prevents the iris from adequate retraction peripherally
  • Manifest Glaucoma+OHT (ocular hypertension), pseudoexfoliation
  • Previous intraocular or corneal surgery of any kind, including any type of surgery for either refractive or therapeutic purposes in either eye
  • Known sensitivity to planned concomitant medications
  • History of lens or zonular instability
  • Keratoconus or keratectasia
  • Immune compromised or diagnosis of connective tissue disease, clinically sign. atopic disease, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, autoimmune diseases, ocular herpes zoster or simplex, endocrine diseases, lupus, RA, collagenosis and other acute or chronic illnesses that increases the risk to the subject or confounds the outcomes of this study, in the opinion of the study PI.
  • Anterior chamber depth (ACD) \< 1.5 mm or ACD \> 4.8 mm as measured from the corneal endothelium.
  • Extensive corneal scarring
  • Developmental disability or cognitive impairment (would preclude adequate comprehension of the Informed Consent (IC) form and/or the ability to record the study measurements)
  • Concurrent participation in another ophthalmological clinical study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lens DiseasesEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sarah Moyle
Organization
Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG

Study Officials

  • Bojan Pajic, MD, PhD

    Augenzentrum ORASIS AG

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2015

First Posted

January 30, 2015

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 28, 2016

Study Completion

February 28, 2017

Last Updated

October 23, 2019

Results First Posted

October 23, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09