NCT02349568

Brief Summary

Multiple reports in the literature showed the efficacy of EUS comparable to ERCP in the diagnosis of common bile duct ( CBD ) stone. The EUS-based strategy has provided the cost effectiveness in diagnosis of CBD stone in defined patient risk groups was showed in previous studies. The aim of our study was to assess the cost effectiveness of EUS based strategy versus ERCP based strategy in diagnosis of CBD stones in patients with intermediate risks for CBD stones in a real working situation in a developing country.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
141

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2012

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2013

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 16, 2015

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 29, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

January 29, 2015

Status Verified

January 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

January 16, 2015

Last Update Submit

January 23, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The cost of making diagnosis of CBD stone

    The cost of making diagnosis of CBD stone will be measured as the difference in the cost of all patients undergoing ERCP and ERCP follow by EUS intervention. The cost was evaluated by (1) mean costs of EUS and ERCP based on the actual cost in our center which included costs of medical staffs, disposable materials, drugs, equipment amortization and maintenance. (2) costs associated with complications induced by the procedure.

    within 12 months after EUS

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • The accuracy of EUS in diagnosis of CBD stone

    within 12 months after EUS

  • The safety of EUS and ERCP procedure

    within 1 months

Study Arms (2)

High risk group

High risk group was defined when CBD stones was detected by ultrasound ( US ) / computed tomography ( CT ) or dilated duct with abnormal LFT.

Procedure: High risk group

Intermediate risk group

Intermediate risk group was defined when US/CT showed normal bile duct with abnormal LFT or dilated duct with normal LFT.

Procedure: Intermediate risk group

Interventions

Patients with high risk underwent EUS examination under conscious sedation. EUS was examined from second part of duodenum up to duodenal bulb. All patients even if negative EUS examination of CBD stone were underwent ERCP in the same session. The ERCPs were performed in standard manner. All patients were contacted by phone on day 1, 3 and 30 after the procedure.

Also known as: EUS examination follow by ERCP
High risk group

Patients with intermediate risk underwent EUS examination under conscious sedation. EUS was examined from second part of duodenum up to duodenal bulb. ERCPs were done at the discretion of the attending physicians. The ERCPs were performed in standard manner. The patients without ERCP done were contacted at 3 months interval to assess symptoms and LFT for 12 months.

Also known as: EUS examination follow by ERCP or clinical follow up
Intermediate risk group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All patients with suspected CBD stones based on clinical, biochemical and imaging by trans-abdominal ultrasonography or computed tomography..

You may qualify if:

  • history of biliary pain or recent cholangitis
  • acute pancreatitis
  • abnormal liver function test
  • dilatation of CBD and or CBD stone detected by trans-abdominal ultrasound and or computed tomography.

You may not qualify if:

  • unstable hemodynamics
  • severe coagulopathy
  • refusal to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

NKC Institues of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Prince of Songkla University

Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, 90110, Thailand

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gallstones

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CholelithiasisBiliary Tract DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesCholecystolithiasisGallbladder DiseasesCalculiPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Bancha Ovartlarnporn, MD

    NKC Institue of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkla, Thailand.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
NKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2015

First Posted

January 29, 2015

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion

December 1, 2013

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

January 29, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-01

Locations