The Cost Effectiveness of Endoscopic Ultrasound ( EUS ) Based Strategy in Diagnosis of Common Bile Duct Stones
The Cost Effectiveness Between EUS-based Strategy Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ( ERCP )-Based Strategy in Diagnosis of Common Bile Duct Stones in Patients With Intermediate Risk: a Study in Developing Country.
1 other identifier
observational
141
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Multiple reports in the literature showed the efficacy of EUS comparable to ERCP in the diagnosis of common bile duct ( CBD ) stone. The EUS-based strategy has provided the cost effectiveness in diagnosis of CBD stone in defined patient risk groups was showed in previous studies. The aim of our study was to assess the cost effectiveness of EUS based strategy versus ERCP based strategy in diagnosis of CBD stones in patients with intermediate risks for CBD stones in a real working situation in a developing country.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2012
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2015
CompletedJanuary 29, 2015
January 1, 2015
1.6 years
January 16, 2015
January 23, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The cost of making diagnosis of CBD stone
The cost of making diagnosis of CBD stone will be measured as the difference in the cost of all patients undergoing ERCP and ERCP follow by EUS intervention. The cost was evaluated by (1) mean costs of EUS and ERCP based on the actual cost in our center which included costs of medical staffs, disposable materials, drugs, equipment amortization and maintenance. (2) costs associated with complications induced by the procedure.
within 12 months after EUS
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The accuracy of EUS in diagnosis of CBD stone
within 12 months after EUS
The safety of EUS and ERCP procedure
within 1 months
Study Arms (2)
High risk group
High risk group was defined when CBD stones was detected by ultrasound ( US ) / computed tomography ( CT ) or dilated duct with abnormal LFT.
Intermediate risk group
Intermediate risk group was defined when US/CT showed normal bile duct with abnormal LFT or dilated duct with normal LFT.
Interventions
Patients with high risk underwent EUS examination under conscious sedation. EUS was examined from second part of duodenum up to duodenal bulb. All patients even if negative EUS examination of CBD stone were underwent ERCP in the same session. The ERCPs were performed in standard manner. All patients were contacted by phone on day 1, 3 and 30 after the procedure.
Patients with intermediate risk underwent EUS examination under conscious sedation. EUS was examined from second part of duodenum up to duodenal bulb. ERCPs were done at the discretion of the attending physicians. The ERCPs were performed in standard manner. The patients without ERCP done were contacted at 3 months interval to assess symptoms and LFT for 12 months.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients with suspected CBD stones based on clinical, biochemical and imaging by trans-abdominal ultrasonography or computed tomography..
You may qualify if:
- history of biliary pain or recent cholangitis
- acute pancreatitis
- abnormal liver function test
- dilatation of CBD and or CBD stone detected by trans-abdominal ultrasound and or computed tomography.
You may not qualify if:
- unstable hemodynamics
- severe coagulopathy
- refusal to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
NKC Institues of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Prince of Songkla University
Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, 90110, Thailand
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bancha Ovartlarnporn, MD
NKC Institue of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkla, Thailand.
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- NKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2015
First Posted
January 29, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 29, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-01