Effectiveness Study of Teacher Training and Social and Financial Education in Rwanda's Primary and Secondary Schools
Active Learning Methods for Social and Financial Education in Rwanda's Primary and Secondary Schools: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
1,750
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study uses experimental methods to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention in Rwanda. The intervention, designed by Aflatoun and AMIR, involves training teachers on the use of active-learning methods to implement a social and financial education curriculum with students in primary and secondary schools. Teachers then implement the social and financial curriculum with students in order to improve their personal, social, and financial competencies. Teacher training will take place in November-December 2013 and the curriculum implementation will be evaluated in the 2014 school year. The study will examine the following hypotheses:
- 1.Did teachers use of active learning methods in class increase due to the training received?
- 2.Did students' levels of engagement and on-task behaviour increase as a result of the intervention's pedagogy and content?
- 3.Did the following competencies of students improve due to the intervention?
- 4.Self-efficacy
- 5.Social skills
- 6.Financial literacy
- 7.Planning attitudes
- 8.Savings attitudes
- 9.Savings behavior
- 10.Entrepreneurship
- 11.Did the intervention change student's pass rates on the primary six (P6) and secondary three (S3) final examinations for the classes in which it was implemented?
- 12.Did the intervention change student drop out rates in the classes which it was implemented?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedJuly 31, 2015
July 1, 2015
1.2 years
July 9, 2014
July 30, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in Teacher Use of Active Learning Methods (Observed)
A composite, standardized variable combining 5-items from an observational instrument filled out by enumerators observing teachers' classes.
Up to 12 months
Change in Teacher Use of Active Learning Methods (Self-reported)
A composite, standardized variable combining 7-items from a self-reported instrument capturing the confidence of teachers using these seven specified active learning methods.
Up to 8 months
Change in Teacher Use of Active Learning Methods (Student report)
A composite, standardized variable combining 4-items from students' structured interviews about their teacher's use of active learning methods.
Up to 8 months
Change in Classroom Level of Student Engagement (Observed)
A composite, standardized variable combining structured observations of 7 randomly selected students for three different 10-second intervals in each teacher's classroom using an adapted version of the PreQuip tool designed by Educans at the University of Amsterdam.
Up to 12 months
Change in Student engagement (Student report)
A composite, standardized variable combining 4-items measured using structured interviews of 7 randomly selected students in each teacher's classroom.
Up to 8 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in Students' Generalized Self-efficacy Scale (GSES-10)
Up to 8 months
Change in Students' Pro-Social (PS) (6-item) and Conduct Disorder (CD) (6-item) subscales of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Up to 8 months
Change in Students' Financial Literacy
Up to 8 months
Change in Students' Planning Attitudes
Up to 8 months
Change in Students' Savings Behavior
Up to 8 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Difference in standardized examination pass rates on primary 6 (P6) and secondary 3 (S3) tests in study classes
December 2014
Difference in percentage drop out rates of students in study classes
December 2014
Change in Teachers use of Active Learning Methods (Observed) mediates Student Engagement (Observed)
Up to 12 months
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Treatment as usual
NO INTERVENTIONSchools in which regular curriculum is delivered and teachers do not receive any additional training in child centered methodologies.
Child centered teaching of life-skills
EXPERIMENTALTraining of teachers and weekly implementation of hour long sessions based on child centered teaching of life-skills education over the course of the school year in P6 and S3 classes as designed by Aflatoun Stichting Child Savings International and the Association of Microfinance Institutions in Rwanda (AMIR). The life-skills curriculum is known as Aflatoun's Child Social and Financial Education program. The training of teachers element of the intervention is known as Aflatoun Academy, which trains teachers in active learning, child centered methodologies as well as how to implement the life-skills curriculum of Aflatoun Child Social and Financial Education.
Interventions
The intervention includes five core components: (1) personal understanding and exploration, (2) rights and responsibilities, (3) savings and spending, (4) planning and budgeting, and (5) social and financial enterprise. The training and curriculum are both manualized. The curriculum is in English and is regionally specific (for Anglophone Africa) and has been contextualized for Rwanda. The minimum hours required by Aflatoun's fidelity guide is 20 hours which includes 10 hours of curriculum lesson and 10 hours of learning activities (savings groups, social and financial projects, club activities etc).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Schools willing to participate in the intervention.
- Classes of students in grade P6 or S3 during academic year 2014
- Teachers of entrepreneurship, social studies, or mathematics
You may not qualify if:
- Non-consenting individuals
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Association of Microfinance Institutions in Rwanda
Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2014
First Posted
January 28, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 31, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07