Observational Study of Quality of Live in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
aLIVE
Observational Cohort Study of Health-related Quality of Life in Patients Initiating Treatment With Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
120
1 country
12
Brief Summary
This is an observational, post-authorization, prospective follow-up, multi-centre, national study designed to describe the spectrum of health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy This study is designed to observe patients treated in routine clinical practice, without the exclusion limitations of a clinical trial. Patients will be enrolled in 7 Spanish sites. In all cases, the decision to treat patients will be performed prior to the decision to include the patient in the study. Given the observational nature of the study, follow-up of patients will be performed according to standard clinical practice of each site.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2014
Longer than P75 for all trials
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 9, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 16, 2018
CompletedJanuary 25, 2019
January 1, 2019
1.9 years
December 30, 2014
January 23, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
Patients with mild improvement in Quality of life questionnaire - Current standard version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scoring
Number of participants with mild improvement. Mild improvement in QoL : (increased from ≥ 5 to \<10 points), moderate (increase of between ≥ 10 and \<20 points), and high (increase ≥ 20 points) in EORTC QLQ-C30) scoring.
Up to 18 months
Patients with mild impairment of EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring
Number of participants with mild impairment. Mild impairment of QoL (decrease from ≥ 5 to \<10 points), moderate (decrease from ≥ 10 and \<20 points), and severe (decrease ≥ 20 points) in EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring); mean time to improvement of Quality of Life (QoL) of mild, moderate and high in EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring
Up to 18 months
Patients with moderate improvement in EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring
Number of participants with moderate improvement. Mild improvement in QoL (increased from ≥ 5 to \<10 points), moderate (increase of between ≥ 10 and \<20 points), and high (increase ≥ 20 points) in EORTC QLQ-C30) scoring.
Up to 18 months
Patients with moderate impairment of EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring
Number of participants with moderate impairment.Mild impairment of QoL (decrease from ≥ 5 to \<10 points), moderate (decrease from ≥ 10 and \<20 points), and severe (decrease ≥ 20 points) in EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring); mean time to improvement of QoLof mild, moderate and high in EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring
Up to 18 months
Patients with high improvement in EORTC QLQ-C3 scoring
Number of participants with high improvement. Mild improvement in QoL (increased from ≥ 5 to \<10 points), moderate (increase of between ≥ 10 and \<20 points), and high (increase ≥ 20 points) in EORTC QLQ-C30) scoring.
Up to 18 months
Patients with high impairment of EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring
Number of participants with high impairment. Mild impairment of QoL (decrease from ≥ 5 to \<10 points), moderate (decrease from ≥ 10 and \<20 points), and severe (decrease ≥ 20 points) in EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring); mean time to improvement of QoLof mild, moderate and high in EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring
Up to 18 months
Impairment of mild EORTC QLQ-C30 score
Time from enrolment to the first observation of a definite impairment of mild EORTC QLQ-C30 score (decrease from ≥ 5 to \<10 points without further improvement ≥ 5 points)
Up to 18 months
Deterioration of Moderate EORTC QLQ-C30 Score
The time from enrollment to the first observation of a definite deterioration of moderate EORTC QLQ-C30 score (decrease from ≥ 10 and \<20 points without further improvement ≥ 10 points)
Up to 18 months
Deterioration of severe EORTC QLQ-C30
Time from enrolment to the first observation of a definite deterioration of moderate EORTC QLQ-C30 score (decrease from ≥ 10 and \<20 points without further improvement ≥ 10 points)
Up to 18 months
Definite deterioration of moderate EORTC QLQ-C30 Score
Percentage of Time from enrollment to the first observation of a definite deterioration of moderate EORTC QLQ-C30 score (decrease from ≥ 10 and \<20 points without further improvement ≥ 10 points)
Up to 18 months
Mild/moderate/severe decline in EORTC QLQ-C30
Number of patients with mild/moderate/severe decline in EORTC QLQ-C30 on the 30th day, 2nd month, 3rd month, 4th month, 5th month and 6th month.
Up to 18 months
Patients with mild/moderate/high improvement in EORTC QLQ-C30
Percentage of patients with mild/moderate/high improvement in EORTC QLQ-C30 on the 30th day, 2nd month, 3rd month, 4th month, 5th month and 6th month.
Up to 18 months
Deterioration of severe QLQ-C30
Time from enrolment to the first observation of a definite deterioration of moderate EORTC QLQ-C30 score (decrease from ≥ 10 and \<20 points without further improvement ≥ 10 points)
Up to 18 months
Change from baseline of the EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D).
Change from baseline of the EQ-5D questionnaire at 15 days, 4 weeks, 2 months, 3rd month, 4th month, 5th month and 6th month
Up to 6 months
Change from baseline of the Karnofsky index
Change from baseline of Karnofsky index at 15 days, 4 weeks, 2 months, 3rd month, 4th month, 5th month and 6th month.
Up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (22)
Feasibility of using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D questionnaires
Up to 6 months
Average variation of Karnofsky index versus EORTC QLQ-C30 score
Up to 6 months
Percentage of improved Karnofsky index
Up to 18 months
Average variation of Karnofsky index versus EQ-5D score
Up to 6 months
Percentage of improved Karnofsky index
Up to 6 months
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Pateints with metastatic pancreatic cancer
Patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer confirmed histologically or cytologically, who will be treated with chemotherapy as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. This study is designed to observe patients treated in routine clinical practice, without the exclusion limitations of a clinical trial. The decision to treat patients will be performed prior to the decision to include the patient in the study. The follow-up of patients will be performed according to standard clinical practice of each site
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who will be treated with any of the first line chemotherapy treatments at the participating site approved for the treatment of Metastasic Pancreatic Cancer (MPC) will be included consecutively according to the criteria set. Therefore, the choice of therapeutic strategy will be made according to usual clinical practice and independently by the doctor before assessing the possible involvement of the patients in the study and their corresponding inclusion in it. The patients selected for the study must meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion.
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years.
- Patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer confirmed histologically or cytologically
- Patients with Karnofsky index ≥ 70 previously untreated with chemotherapy.
- Patients with life expectancy ≥ 6 months.
- Patients who will be treated with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer.\*
- Informed consent in writing or orally before witnesses.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Patients who are participating in an interventional clinical trial.
- Patients who refuse to participate in this study.
- Patients who have no ability to understand and respond to questions related to their health.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Celgenelead
Study Sites (12)
Hospital Universitario Burgos
Burgos, Castille and León, 09006, Spain
Complejo Asistencial León
León, Castille and León, 24071, Spain
Hospital del Bierzo
León, Castille and León, 24404, Spain
Hospital Universitario Salamanca
Salamanca, Castille and León, 37007, Spain
Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Catalonia, 08916, Spain
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08003, Spain
Hospital Vall d´Hebron
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035, Spain
Hospital Universitario Josep Trueta de Girona
Girona, Catalonia, 17007, Spain
Hospital Duran I Reynals (ICO Bellvitge)
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08908, Spain
Hospital San Joan Reus
Reus, Catalonia, 43204, Spain
Hospital de Sabadell ( Parc Taulí)
Sabadell, Catalonia, 08208, Spain
Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 008026, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lorena Pellín, MD
Celgene Spain
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2014
First Posted
January 21, 2015
Study Start
December 10, 2014
Primary Completion
November 9, 2016
Study Completion
November 16, 2018
Last Updated
January 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01