Effects of a Training Intervention After Thoracoabdominal Oesophagus Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
64
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the effect of a training intervention after thoracoabdominal resection of the oesophagus. Half of the patients scheduled for thoracoabdominal oesophagus surgery were randomized to an intervention group while the other half a control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2005
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 5, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 12, 2015
CompletedJanuary 6, 2020
January 1, 2020
5.7 years
December 30, 2014
January 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Degree of physical disability estimated by the Disability Rating Index (DRI)
12 items covering activities from dressing and going for walks to lifting heavy objects and exercising. The item responses were rated on visual analogue scales (0-100)
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Pain in the neck, rib cage and shoulders (visual analogue scale)
3 months
FVC (Forced Vital Capacity)
3 months
Range of motion
3 months
Physical function (Time stand test and heel rise test)
3 months
Physical Activity (six-level scale)
3 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Training group
EXPERIMENTALTraining program: Daily exercises for 3 months
Controls
NO INTERVENTIONStandard care
Interventions
After 1 week * Chest expansions * Static thoracic extension in prone * Lateral flexion of the spine in standing * Bilateral shoulder flexion * Shoulder external rotation of shoulders * Rotation of the thoracic spine in sitting * Static back extensor strength in prone After 1 month * Thoracic extension, rotation and flexion abduction * Hand in neck and in back * Bilateral active flexion abduction * Strength training of leg muscles * Static back extensor strength After 2 months * Strength training of legs and back muscles * Push-ups against a wall * Thoracic extension in sitting and standing * Thoracic rotation in lying * Stretching of mm. pectoralis Training was performed daily with 10 rep of each exercise
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for thoracoabdominal oesophageal resection
- Ability to perform 90 W during a sub-maximal bicycle test
- Ability to speak Swedish
You may not qualify if:
- Serious untreated cardiac disease that may be critical
- Musculoskeletal or neurological disease or trauma affecting respiration or range of motion in the rib cage
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Göteborg Universitylead
- Karolinska University Hospitalcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Monika Fagevik Olsén, PhD
Professor at Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sweden
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2014
First Posted
January 12, 2015
Study Start
September 5, 2005
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
January 6, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01