Effectiveness of Sugammadex in LMS Surgery
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Rocuronium - Sugammadex With Succinylcholine-Cisatracurium-Neostigmine in Patients Undergoing Laser Microlaryngeal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study is comparing of rocuronium-sugammadex and succinylcholine during LMS surgery that is characterized by short operation time, required intense paralysis and ambulatory setting, has not been investigated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 27, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 28, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 28, 2015
August 1, 2015
6 months
December 27, 2014
August 4, 2015
August 31, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Recovery of T1 to 90%
we measure the time from the end of surgery to recovery of the TOF 0.9. The end of surgery is defined as the time when the direct laryngoscope, aided by an operation microscope, is removed.
from the end of surgery(when the surgeon removes the suspension laryngoscope ) to time when the TOF ratio is 0.9, up to 30 minutes
Surgical Rating Score
describe by surgeon under his subjective opinion. 1 - extremely poor conditions 2- poor conditions 3- acceptable conditions 4- good conditions 5- optimal conditions
during surgery
Addition of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
Repeated small boluses or drip of Succinylcholine, or small boluses of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants with intermediate duration are usually followed. In this protocol, cisatracurium was injected after intubation to maintain neuromuscular blockade during surgery. We measure the requirement of additive dose of neuromuscular blocker to ensure that neuromuscular blockade remains below T2 during surgery
during surgery
Recovery of T1 to 10%
we measure the time from the end of surgery to recovery of the TOF 0.1. The end of surgery is defined as the time when the direct laryngoscope, aided by an operation microscope, is removed.
from the end of surgery to time when the TOF ratio is 0.1, up to 30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time to Extubation
from the end of surgery to extubate a tracheal tube
Time to First Spontaneous Breath
from end of surgery to first spontaneous breaths
Time to Eye Opening
from end of surgery to opening of the eyes to verbal commands
Other Outcomes (2)
Length of Stay in te Operating Room
time from in to out of the operating room
Anesthesia Time
from the anesthesia start to end
Study Arms (2)
R-S group
EXPERIMENTALRocuronium-Sugammadex group 1. Induction of anesthesia : 1% propofol 1.5-2.5 mg/kg with fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg 2. Muscle relaxant agent : Rocuronium 1mg/kg 3. After endotracheal intubation : normal saline(0.025 ml/kg) 4. Additive dose, for ensuring that neuromuscular blockade remains below T2 during surgery : Rocuronium 0.15mg/kg 5. Relaxant agent reversal. at the the end of surgery : sugammadex 2mg/kg
S-C-N group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSuccinylcholine-Cisatracurium-Neostigmine group 1. Induction of anesthesia :1% propofol 1.5-2.5 mg/kg with fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg 2. Muscle relaxant agent :Succinylcholine 1mg/kg 3. After endotracheal intubation : Cisatracurium 0.08mg/kg 4. Additive dose, for ensuring that neuromuscular blockade remains below T2 during surgery : Succinylcholine 10mg 5. Relaxant agent reversal at the appearance of second TOF twitch (T2) : Neostigmine 0.2mg/kg with atropine 10 mcg/kg (for preventing side effects of neostigmine)
Interventions
Sugammadex 2mg/kg was injected to patients to R-S group, as reversal of neuromuscular blockade.
Neostigmine (pyridostigmine) 0.2 mg/kg mg was injected to patients to S-C-N group, as reversal of neuromuscular blockade.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologist\[ASA\] class 1-3
- scheduled Laser microlaryngeal surgery under general anesthesia
- written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- suspected difficult tracheal intubation
- disorder affecting neuromuscular blockade
- known or suspected significant renal dysfunction
- known or suspected severe hepatic dysfunction
- history of malignant hyperthermia
- allergy of opioids, neuromuscular blocking drugs or other medications used during general anesthesia
- contraindication to pyridostigmine and/or atropine
- pregnancy
- breast feeding
- body mass index \> 27kg/m2
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Lee C, Jahr JS, Candiotti KA, Warriner B, Zornow MH, Naguib M. Reversal of profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex administered three minutes after rocuronium: a comparison with spontaneous recovery from succinylcholine. Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1020-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819dabb0.
PMID: 19387176RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The surgical rating score was assessed on the basis of the degree of laryngx exposure. This was influenced not only by neuromuscular relaxation but also by anatomical factors.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Seolju Park
- Organization
- Korea University Anam Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jangeun Cho, M.D.,Ph.D.
Anesthesia and pain medicine department, Korea University Anam Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 27, 2014
First Posted
January 1, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 28, 2015
Results First Posted
September 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08