W-Shaped Acetabular Angular Plate (WAAP) Versus Reconstruction Plate
Prospective Comparison Between W-Shaped Acetabular Angular Plate (WAAP) and Reconstruction Plate for the Treatment of Posterior Acetabular Wall Fracture
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether this new W-Shaped Angular Plate is more effective and more safe to operate than the traditional reconstruction plate in the treatment of the posterior wall fracture of acetabulum.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Dec 2014
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedAugust 17, 2016
August 1, 2016
2.2 years
December 20, 2014
August 15, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction quality of fracture
Based on the radiographic grade criteria developed by Matta
Six months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Surgical details
Intraoperative
Early postoperative complications
One month
Late postoperative complications
One year
Evaluation of Clinical outcome
One year
Study Arms (2)
WP group
EXPERIMENTALWP group:treated with W-Shaped Angular Plate
RP group
ACTIVE COMPARATORRP group:treated with Reconstruction Plate
Interventions
Treatment of posterior wall fracture of the acetabulum with a W-Shaped Angular Plate
Treatment of posterior wall fracture of the acetabulum with a Reconstruction Plate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female aged 18 years or older(with no upper age limit)
- Sustained a posterior acetabular wall fracture(ASIF/OTA classification 62-A1)
- Operation was performed within 14 days after the fracture occurring
You may not qualify if:
- Presented with a pathologic acetabular fracture
- Neuropathic arthropathy,dementia and other disease processes which made postoperative compliance unreliable
- Refused to participate
- Patients who were unable to walk before injury
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Zhiyong Hou, MD
Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shuai Shang, MM
Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Director of Orthopaedic Center,MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2014
First Posted
December 31, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 17, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08