Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Safety & Efficacy of Sarecycline in Treatment of Acne
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 1.5 mg/kg Per Day of Sarecycline Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
1 other identifier
interventional
1,034
1 country
57
Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an approximate 1.5 mg/kg/day dose of oral sarecycline compared to placebo in the treatment of moderate to severe facial acne vulgaris
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Dec 2014
57 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 3, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 15, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 12, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 12, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 7, 2018
CompletedFebruary 1, 2019
January 1, 2019
2.1 years
December 15, 2014
April 3, 2018
January 31, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 12
Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion \< 0.5 centimeter (cm) in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus \< 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion \> 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scale Success at Week 12
The investigator assessed the participant's inflammatory lesions on the face using the IGA 5-point scale. The scale ranges from 0 (best): clear, no evidence of papules or pustules to 4 (worst): severe, inflammatory lesions are more apparent, many papules/pustules, there may or may not be a few nodulocytic lesions. Success was defined as at least a 2-point decrease (improvement) from Baseline on the IGA assessment as well as a score of clear (0) or almost clear (1). The percentage of participants who achieved success is reported. Analyses were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 12
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 9
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 9
Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 6
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 3
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 3
Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 9
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 9
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Sarecycline
EXPERIMENTALSarecycline tablets, 1.5 milligram(mg)/kilogram(kg)/day, taken orally once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo-matching sarecycline tablets, taken orally once daily for 12 weeks.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent or assent form
- Male/female, 9 to 45 years of age, inclusive
- Body weight between 33 and 136 kg, inclusive
- Facial acne vulgaris with:
- inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules and nodules)
- noninflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones)
- No more than 2 nodules
- Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of moderate (3) or severe (4)
- Negative urine pregnancy test at baseline - females of childbearing potential
- Agrees to use an effective method of contraception throughout the study
- Refrain from use of any other acne medications and medicated cleansers, and avoid excessive sun exposure and tanning booths for duration of study
- Able to fulfill the requirements of protocol, indicated willingness to participate in the study and agrees to all study procedures (including mandatory photography) by providing written informed consent/assent and an authorization to disclose protected health information (PHI).
You may not qualify if:
- Has a dermatological condition of the face that could interfere with the clinical evaluations
- Has a history of any of the following:
- Allergy to tetracycline-class antibiotics or to any ingredient in the study drug
- Pseudomembranous colitis or antibiotic-associated colitis
- Treated for any type of cancer within the last 6 months
- Has known resistance to other tetracyclines
- Has receive any of the following treatments within 12 weeks of screening:
- Systemic retinoids
- Systemic corticosteroids
- Androgens/anti-androgenic therapy (eg, anabolic steroids, spironolactone)
- Non-medicated procedures for the treatment of acne (eg, laser, light or ThermaClear)
- Has used any acne affecting treatment without an appropriate washout period
- Has initiated hormonal contraceptive use within 12 weeks prior to screening or plans to initiate or switch hormonal contraceptive products during the study period
- Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy during the study period
- Has any other disorder causing hyperandrogenism including, but not limited to polycystic ovary syndrome, adrenal or ovarian tumors, Cushings disease or congenital adrenal hyperplasia
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Almirall, S.A.lead
- Allergancollaborator
Study Sites (57)
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #206)
Mobile, Alabama, 36608, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #236)
Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #245)
Carlsbad, California, 92008, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #234)
Encinitas, California, 92024, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #209)
Fremont, California, 94538, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #215)
Oceanside, California, 92056, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #204)
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #254)
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #257)
Santa Ana, California, 92701, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #243)
Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #222)
Denver, Colorado, 80220, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #237)
Aventura, Florida, 33180, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #226)
Clearwater, Florida, 33761, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #238)
Jupiter, Florida, 33458, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #255)
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #249)
Miami, Florida, 33142, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #202)
Miami, Florida, 33144, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #211)
Miramar, Florida, 33027, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #247)
Ocala, Florida, 34471, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #241)
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #228)
Pinellas Park, Florida, 33781, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #203)
Tampa, Florida, 33609, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #242)
Snellville, Georgia, 30078, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #210)
Champaign, Illinois, 61820, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #213)
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #217)
Rockville, Maryland, 20850, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #248)
Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #205)
Bay City, Michigan, 48706, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #251)
Clarkston, Michigan, 48346, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #235)
Clinton Township, Michigan, 48038, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #227)
Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #221)
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #231)
Omaha, Nebraska, 68144, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #253)
Newington, New Hampshire, 03801, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #239)
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #208)
New York, New York, 10155, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #240)
Rochester, New York, 14623, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #230)
Stony Brook, New York, 11790, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #229)
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #250)
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #218)
Beachwood, Ohio, 44122, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #256)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #214)
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #219)
Fountain Inn, South Carolina, 29644, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #225)
Goodlettsville, Tennessee, 37072, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #216)
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37922, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #252)
Arlington, Texas, 76011, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #220)
College Station, Texas, 77845, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #201)
Katy, Texas, 77494, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #223)
Pflugerville, Texas, 78660, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #207)
San Antonio, Texas, 78218, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #224)
Webster, Texas, 77598, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #212)
West Jordan, Utah, 84088, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #244)
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #246)
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #233)
Walla Walla, Washington, 99362, United States
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #232)
Madison, Wisconsin, 53719, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head,
- Organization
- Allergan, Inc
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
David Berk, MD
Allergan, plc
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2014
First Posted
December 23, 2014
Study Start
December 3, 2014
Primary Completion
January 12, 2017
Study Completion
January 12, 2017
Last Updated
February 1, 2019
Results First Posted
May 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2019-01