Electrical Stimulation for Attenuating Muscle Atrophy
A New Paradigm of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Attenuating Muscle Atrophy: a Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
105
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objectives: This study aims to examine the use of low frequency (2Hz), low amplitude (intensity just produce visible muscle contraction), and long duration (2x3 hrs/day) neuromuscular electrical simulation (NMES) in attenuating the effects of muscle atrophy resulted from disuse. Design and subjects: The study is a randomized, double-blind, controlled, and parallel group study. Subjects with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) will be included. Intervention: Subjects will be randomized to 3 groups to receive different NMES program over the quadriceps and calf muscles: (i) the proposed NMES program; (ii) conventional NMES program (50Hz, 30 min/day), or sham group for a period of 8 weeks. Outcome measures:The effectiveness of the NMES will be evaluated by the improvement in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), muscle performance (muscle strength, muscle shortening velocity and muscle activation testing), functional performance (6 min walk) and subjects' rating of the perceived acceptability of the stimulation protocol. Data analysis: Baseline characteristics of the intervention and sham groups will be compared using one way ANOVA. Two-way mixed repeated measures analysis of variance will be performed to examine the differences between groups over time for all the outcome variables. The significance level is set at p \< 0.05. Expected results: The investigators hypothesize that the proposed new paradigm of NMES would be more effective in improving muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), strength, endurance, and exercise tolerance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 22, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 25, 2016
February 1, 2016
10 months
December 8, 2014
February 24, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Muscle cross sectional area (quadriceps and calf muscles)
Ultrasonography of the quadriceps and calf muscle cross sectional area measured at baseline, week 4 and week 8 of the study.
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Isometric knee extensor and plantarflexor muscle torque
8 weeks
Muscle activation (Twitch interpolation technique will be used to assess the voluntary muscle activation)
8 weeks
Functional ability (improvement of the muscle strength will furthered be tested on the 6-min walk test)
8 weeks
Acceptability of the stimulation protocol (10 point scale)
8 weeks
Study Arms (3)
NMES new paradigm
EXPERIMENTALFor the NMES new paradigm, A portable electrical stimulator will be used to produce simultaneous stimulation to both the quadriceps and calf muscles. The stimulator delivers a biphasic, asymmetrical square wave at a pulse width of 250 μs and duty cycle 5:10 sec with 2 Hz frequencies of stimulation. To disperse current intensity and enhance the comfort of the stimulation, large rectangular electrodes (80 × 100 mm) will be positioned at the best motor points of the quadriceps and calf muscles. The electrodes will be secured by tight short and sock at the respective positions. The stimulation intensity will be set to just visible muscle contractions. Stimuli will be applied twice a day for 3 h (with a 2 h rest between treatments), 5 days a week for 8 weeks.
NMES conventional
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor NMES conventional, the experimental protocol will be the conventional electrical stimulation protocol i.e frequency: 50 Hz; intensity: maximum intensity tolerated by the subject; duration: 30 min.
Placebo
SHAM COMPARATORFor placebo, electrodes will be applied and all conditions will be similar to those in the NMES group, except that the amplitude will be set to 0 mA so that no muscle stimulation occurs.
Interventions
stimulation frequency: 2 Hz; intensity: low amplitude; duration: 3 hours, 2 times per day for 8 weeks
stimulation frequency: 50 Hz; intensity: maximally tolerated; duration: 30 min per day for 8 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- stable COPD patients who had been discharged from the medical unit, and had been admitted less than 2 times in the preceding year;
- patients drawn from either pulmonary rehabilitation program in Day Care Centre; or self help group; or home bound;
- COPD subjects with Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 sec (FEV1) to Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) ratio: ≤ 70%, oxygen uptake maximum (VO2 max) ≤ 8 MET and BMI ≤ 21kg/m2
You may not qualify if:
- subjects with known muscle wasting diseases such as motor neuron disease, cachexia, e.g. cancer cachexia;
- subjects with muscle dysfunction as a result of neurological conditions such as stroke, Parkinsonism
- subjects that can not comply with the study procedures (e.g. dementia)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hung Hom, HKG, Hong Kong
Related Publications (17)
Paddon-Jones D, Sheffield-Moore M, Cree MG, Hewlings SJ, Aarsland A, Wolfe RR, Ferrando AA. Atrophy and impaired muscle protein synthesis during prolonged inactivity and stress. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Dec;91(12):4836-41. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0651. Epub 2006 Sep 19.
PMID: 16984982BACKGROUNDGreenhaff PL. The molecular physiology of human limb immobilization and rehabilitation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2006 Oct;34(4):159-63. doi: 10.1249/01.jes.0000240017.99877.8a.
PMID: 17031253BACKGROUNDFitts RH, Riley DR, Widrick JJ. Functional and structural adaptations of skeletal muscle to microgravity. J Exp Biol. 2001 Sep;204(Pt 18):3201-8. doi: 10.1242/jeb.204.18.3201.
PMID: 11581335BACKGROUNDFitts RH, Riley DR, Widrick JJ. Physiology of a microgravity environment invited review: microgravity and skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Aug;89(2):823-39. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.2.823.
PMID: 10926670BACKGROUNDAdams GR, Caiozzo VJ, Baldwin KM. Skeletal muscle unweighting: spaceflight and ground-based models. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Dec;95(6):2185-201. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00346.2003.
PMID: 14600160BACKGROUNDSheffler LR, Chae J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation. Muscle Nerve. 2007 May;35(5):562-90. doi: 10.1002/mus.20758.
PMID: 17299744BACKGROUNDBax L, Staes F, Verhagen A. Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Sports Med. 2005;35(3):191-212. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535030-00002.
PMID: 15730336BACKGROUNDMaddocks M, Gao W, Higginson IJ, Wilcock A. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD009419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009419.pub2.
PMID: 23440837BACKGROUNDMaffiuletti NA, Roig M, Karatzanos E, Nanas S. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for preventing skeletal-muscle weakness and wasting in critically ill patients: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2013 May 23;11:137. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-137.
PMID: 23701811BACKGROUNDPetterson S, Snyder-Mackler L. The use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve activation deficits in a patient with chronic quadriceps strength impairments following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Sep;36(9):678-85. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2305.
PMID: 17017273BACKGROUNDSillen MJ, Franssen FM, Gosker HR, Wouters EF, Spruit MA. Metabolic and structural changes in lower-limb skeletal muscle following neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 3;8(9):e69391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069391. eCollection 2013.
PMID: 24019860BACKGROUNDTheriault R, Theriault G, Simoneau JA. Human skeletal muscle adaptation in response to chronic low-frequency electrical stimulation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994 Oct;77(4):1885-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.4.1885.
PMID: 7836213BACKGROUNDNapolis LM, Dal Corso S, Neder JA, Malaguti C, Gimenes AC, Nery LE. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with better preserved fat-free mass. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(3):401-6. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000300006.
PMID: 21552662BACKGROUNDBanerjee P, Caulfield B, Crowe L, Clark AL. Prolonged electrical muscle stimulation exercise improves strength, peak VO2, and exercise capacity in patients with stable chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2009 May;15(4):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.11.005. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
PMID: 19398080BACKGROUNDBanerjee P, Caulfield B, Crowe L, Clark A. Prolonged electrical muscle stimulation exercise improves strength and aerobic capacity in healthy sedentary adults. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Dec;99(6):2307-11. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00891.2004. Epub 2005 Aug 4.
PMID: 16081619BACKGROUNDZhang BT, Yeung SS, Liu Y, Wang HH, Wan YM, Ling SK, Zhang HY, Li YH, Yeung EW. The effects of low frequency electrical stimulation on satellite cell activity in rat skeletal muscle during hindlimb suspension. BMC Cell Biol. 2010 Nov 18;11:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-11-87.
PMID: 21087483RESULTGuo BS, Cheung KK, Yeung SS, Zhang BT, Yeung EW. Electrical stimulation influences satellite cell proliferation and apoptosis in unloading-induced muscle atrophy in mice. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030348. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
PMID: 22253929RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Simon S Yeung, PhD
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2014
First Posted
December 22, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 25, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02