Reducing the Risk of Alarm Fatigue Through the Use of Focused Management in Safety Huddles
Reducine the Risk of Alarm Fatigue Through the Use of Focused Management in Safety Huddles
1 other identifier
interventional
812
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Context: Alarm fatigue is a threat to hospital patient safety. National surveys reveal that high alarm rates interrupt patient care, reduce trust in alarms, and lead clinicians to disable alarms entirely. Safety huddles offer an appropriate forum for reviewing alarm data and identifying patients whose high alarm rates may necessitate safe tailoring of alarm limits. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a focused physiologic monitor alarm reduction intervention integrated into safety huddles that involves discussing safe monitor parameter adjustments on the physiologic monitor alarm rates of individual patients with high alarm rates who meet "low acuity" criteria. Study Design: A prospective, quasi-experimental pilot study of the impact of the huddle intervention on the alarm rates of low acuity high alarm rate individual patients discussed in huddles in the PICU. The huddle intervention will consist of a script to facilitate the discussion of the alarm data. Setting/Participants: Participants will include all low acuity patients and their providers in the PICU at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Study Interventions and Measures: The primary outcome is the rate of crisis and warning alarms per patient day for intervention cases as compared with others in the high alarm / low acuity cohort. Safety measures will include unexpected changes in patient acuity or code blue events within one week of monitor change or discharge.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 15, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedApril 19, 2017
April 1, 2017
1 year
December 15, 2014
April 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in alarm rate before and after intervention
Within-subject comparison evaluating the numbers of alarms and the trajectories of alarm rates in the 24 hours before and up to 72 hours after each huddle
24 hours before intervention and 72 hours after intervention
Study Arms (1)
Primary Subjects
EXPERIMENTALPhysicians and nurse practitioners caring for patients in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). An alarm reduction script will be used to help facilitate discussion of alarm data during weekday morning team "huddles".
Interventions
The intervention will consist of a script to facilitate the discussion of the alarm data that will take place on weekday mornings. The script will be used by huddle participants as a structured outline to rapidly discuss the high alarm low acuity patients eligible for intervention. The patients who are identified will have further discussion on rounds to determine if there are appropriate ways to reduce the alarm rates of individual patients through the safe adjustment of physiologic monitor parameters.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Secondary Subjects:
- Low acuity patients as determined by Optilink Guidelines
- High alarm patients (top 10-20%)
- Admission to the PICU
You may not qualify if:
- Secondary Subjects: Patients who are medically ready for transfer out of ICU or discharge home (status continuously tracked by charge nurse). Patients who are medically ready for transfer out have an accepting service in place and a bed ready on the floor.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher P Bonafide, MD
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2014
First Posted
December 18, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 19, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04