Supporting Practices to Adopt Registry-Based Care
SPARC
Redesigning Diabetes Work Processes for Population-Based Primary Care: Supporting Practices to Adopt Registry-Based Care
1 other identifier
interventional
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an assisted work process redesign intervention in achieving improved diabetes care in primary care practices. The strategies that we will test represent a novel method for assisting practices in developing the skills to overcome "clinical inertia" and health care system barriers to improved diabetes care by helping them to implement and use a diabetes registry to identify needed clinical or preventive services an opportunities for treatment intensification where appropriate for their patients with diabetes. This is accomplished by helping practices develop methods for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of clinical care processes through integration of a diabetes registry into regular clinical practice. This integration is accomplished through changes in the work processes in the practice setting to ensure that population health tasks (such as outreach to patients who do not attend scheduled chronic care visits and systematic identification for follow up of patients who may not be taking prescribed medication therapies) become a part of the regular work of clinical support staff and other members of the primary care practice team.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Jul 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2018
CompletedOctober 17, 2017
October 1, 2017
6.1 years
December 10, 2014
October 15, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hemoglobin A1c
Assessment of HbA1c at baseline and two follow up points. Retrospective documentation of most recent value within previous year.
Change in HbA1c from baseline to follow up (year 1 and year 2)
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALMentored organizational change and feedback.
Education only
OTHEREducation and feedback.
Interventions
Practices are given basic education related to population-based care and are supported by physician peer mentors and given feedback on performance.
Practices are given basic education related to population-based care and are given feedback on performance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary care practice organizations with electronic health records.
- Located in Virginia
You may not qualify if:
- Not a primary care practice.
- No electronic health record.
- Located outside of Virginia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Sabo RT, Etz RS, Gonzalez MM, Johnson NJ, O'Neal JP, Reves SR, Crosson JC. Low-Intensity Intervention Supports Diabetes Registry Implementation: A Cluster-Randomized Trial in the Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network (ACORN). J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct;33(5):728-735. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190455.
PMID: 32989067DERIVEDKeith RE, Crosson JC, O'Malley AS, Cromp D, Taylor EF. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 10;12(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7.
PMID: 28187747DERIVEDEtz RS, Keith RE, Maternick AM, Stein KL, Sabo RT, Hayes MS, Sevak P, Holland J, Crosson JC. Supporting Practices to Adopt Registry-Based Care (SPARC): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 9;10:46. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0232-2.
PMID: 25885661DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jay Crosson, Ph.D.
Mathematica Policy Research
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2014
First Posted
December 17, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
August 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 17, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10