AMP-BPT and His-BPT for Assessment of Asthma
AMPHis
Is Adenosine Monophosphate Superior to Histamine for Bronchial Provocation Test in Evaluation of Asthma?
1 other identifier
interventional
84
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) may reflect airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness, but relationship between AMP and histamine (His, a conventional stimulus) bronchial provocation test (BPT) in asthma is not fully elucidated. The investigators aimed to compare both BPTs and determine their usefulness in reflecting changes of asthmatic symptoms. BPTs were performed in cross-over fashion, at 2-4day intervals. Cumulative doses eliciting 20% FEV1fall (PD20FEV1), diagnostic performance and adverse events were compared. Patients with PD20FEV1 lower than geometric mean were defined as responders, otherwise poor responders. Patients with uncontrolled and partly controlled asthma, who maintained their original inhaled corticosteroids therapy, underwent reassessment of airway responsiveness and asthmatic symptoms 3 and 6 months after.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable asthma
Started Jan 2007
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable asthma
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2014
CompletedDecember 17, 2014
December 1, 2014
11 months
December 7, 2014
December 11, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Cumulative dose eliciting 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20FEV1)
Cumulative dose eliciting 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20FEV1), reported as
up to 12 months (Jan 2007 to Dec 2007)
Asthma symptom score as proposed by Hoggs et al
Asthma symptom score recorded within 1 week, with the highest possible score of 42 for the whole week
up to 12 months (Jan 2007 to Dec 2007)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Baseline spirometry (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, MMEF, PEF)
up to 12 months (Jan 2007 to Dec 2007)
Maximal decrease in FVC following bronchial provocation (expressed as percentage)
up to 12 months (Jan 2007 to Dec 2007)
Maximal decrease in FEV1 following bronchial provocation (expressed as percentage)
up to 12 months (Jan 2007 to Dec 2007)
Maximal decrease in MMEF following bronchial provocation (expressed as percentage)
up to 12 months (Jan 2007 to Dec 2007)
Maximal decrease in PEF following bronchial provocation (expressed as percentage)
up to 12 months (Jan 2007 to Dec 2007)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
incidence of adverse events of both BPTs
up to 12 months (Jan 2007 to Dec 2007)
Study Arms (2)
AMP-BPT
ACTIVE COMPARATORMethods of AMP-BPT, by applying dosimeters, resembled that reported previously \[see references 21-25\]. Briefly, dilutions were delivered via nebulizers (output: 160 μl/min) using automated APS pro system (JAEGER, Hochburg, Germany). Inhalation challenge with normal saline served as control step. Challenge steps were proceeded if FEV1 fall \<15% and restored to \<10% within 1 minute. Subsequent inhalation challenges were performed at 1-minute intervals, and ceased when FEV1 fell by ≥20%. Salbutamol was administered via spacer (Volumatic, Allen \& Hanbury's, UK). Spirometry was reexamined at minutes 3, 5, 10 and thereafter, to ensure safety, before discharge.
His-BPT
ACTIVE COMPARATORMethods of His-BPT, by applying dosimeters, resembled that reported previously \[see references 21-25\]. Briefly, dilutions were delivered via nebulizers (output: 160 μl/min) using automated APS pro system (JAEGER, Hochburg, Germany). Inhalation challenge with normal saline served as control step. Challenge steps were proceeded if FEV1 fall \<15% and restored to \<10% within 1 minute. Subsequent inhalation challenges were performed at 1-minute intervals, and ceased when FEV1 fell by ≥20%. Salbutamol was administered via spacer (Volumatic, Allen \& Hanbury's, UK). Spirometry was reexamined at minutes 3, 5, 10 and thereafter, to ensure safety, before discharge.
Interventions
Patients with uncontrolled and partly controlled asthma, following accomplishment of study 1, were invited to participate in observational study (study 2), which sought to determine usefulness of both BPTs in reflecting improvement of asthmatic symptoms following 3 and 6 months of moderate-dose ICSs treatment (400\~800μg budesonide or equivalent). Patient continued to administer their original ICS during follow-up. During two follow-up visits (3 months apart), AMP-BPT, His-BPT and Hogg's symptom scores were reassessed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged 18\~65 years;
- nil respiratory infection within 3 weeks;
- normal chest radiography;
- baseline FEV1\>60% predicted;
- withdrawn from, if any, oral leukotriene modifiers, corticosteroid or anti-histamine for 5 days, oral xanthenes or long-acting bronchodilators for 2 days, inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) for 24 hours, and salbutamol for 6 hours
You may not qualify if:
- FEV1 fall ≥20% following saline inhalation;
- other chronic lower respiratory diseases (i.e. COPD);
- severe systemic diseases (i.e. uncontrolled hypertension, malignancy);
- limited understanding.
- For healthy subjects, they had to be aged 18\~65 years and had nil respiratory infection within 3 weeks, systemic diseases and had normal lung function.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (25)
O'Byrne PM, Inman MD. Airway hyperresponsiveness. Chest. 2003 Mar;123(3 Suppl):411S-6S. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.3_suppl.411s.
PMID: 12629006BACKGROUNDHanania NA. Targeting airway inflammation in asthma: current and future therapies. Chest. 2008 Apr;133(4):989-98. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0829.
PMID: 18398119BACKGROUNDLeuppi JD. Bronchoprovocation tests in asthma: direct versus indirect challenges. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2014 Jan;20(1):31-6. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000009.
PMID: 24275928BACKGROUNDJanssens T, Verleden G, De Peuter S, Petersen S, Van den Bergh O. Predicting asthma treatment outcome at diagnosis: the role of symptom perception during a histamine challenge test. J Asthma. 2012 Apr;49(3):230-6. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.656864. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
PMID: 22316110BACKGROUNDDor A, Liebhart J, Malolepszy J. [Comparison of exercise and histamine provocation tests in patients with bronchial asthma]. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 1999;67(1-2):22-7. Polish.
PMID: 10481521BACKGROUNDDriver AG, Kukoly CA, Ali S, Mustafa SJ. Adenosine in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Jul;148(1):91-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.1.91.
PMID: 8317821BACKGROUNDAli S, Mustafa SJ, Driver AG, Metzger WJ. Release of adenosine in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid following allergen bronchial provocation in allergic rabbits. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;143:A417
BACKGROUNDPolosa R, Ng WH, Crimi N, Vancheri C, Holgate ST, Church MK, Mistretta A. Release of mast-cell-derived mediators after endobronchial adenosine challenge in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Mar;151(3 Pt 1):624-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/151.3_Pt_1.624.
PMID: 7881647BACKGROUNDvan den Berge M, Kerstjens HA, Meijer RJ, de Reus DM, Koeter GH, Kauffman HF, Postma DS. Corticosteroid-induced improvement in the PC20 of adenosine monophosphate is more closely associated with reduction in airway inflammation than improvement in the PC20 of methacholine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Oct 1;164(7):1127-32. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.7.2102135.
PMID: 11673197BACKGROUNDDe Meer G, Heederik D, Postma DS. Bronchial responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) and methacholine differ in their relationship with airway allergy and baseline FEV(1). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Feb 1;165(3):327-31. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.165.3.2104066.
PMID: 11818315BACKGROUNDSuh DI, Lee JK, Kim CK, Koh YY. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate, and the presence and degree of atopy in young children with asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011 Mar;41(3):338-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03664.x. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
PMID: 21255136BACKGROUNDSuh DI, Lee JK, Kim CK, Koh YY. Methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) responsiveness, and the presence and degree of atopy in children with asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011 Feb;22(1 Pt 2):e101-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2010.01110.x.
PMID: 21342276BACKGROUNDKim CK, Choi SJ, Lee JK, Suh DI, Koh YY. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and adenosine monophosphate and the degree of atopy in children with allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Jan;106(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.10.019.
PMID: 21195943BACKGROUNDThe Respiratory Society of the Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for lung function testing (Part 3): Histamine and methacholine bronchial provocation test. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2014; 37:566-71
BACKGROUNDO'Byrne P, Bateman ED, Bousquet JD. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Updated 2006. Available at http://www.ginasthma.org/Guidelines/guidelines-resources.html Latest accessed: Sep 20, 2014
BACKGROUNDHogg JC, James AL, Pare PD. Evidence for inflammation in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Mar;143(3 Pt 2):S39-42. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.3_Pt_2.S39. No abstract available.
PMID: 2003688BACKGROUNDMiller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Wanger J; ATS/ERS Task Force. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005 Aug;26(2):319-38. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805. No abstract available.
PMID: 16055882BACKGROUNDMiller MR, Crapo R, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Wanger J; ATS/ERS Task Force. General considerations for lung function testing. Eur Respir J. 2005 Jul;26(1):153-61. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034505. No abstract available.
PMID: 15994402BACKGROUNDBrusasco V, Crapo R, Viegi G; American Thoracic Society; European Respiratory Society. Coming together: the ATS/ERS consensus on clinical pulmonary function testing. Eur Respir J. 2005 Jul;26(1):1-2. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034205. No abstract available.
PMID: 15994380BACKGROUNDZheng J, Zhong N. Normative values of pulmonary function testing in Chinese adults. Chin Med J (Engl). 2002 Jan;115(1):50-4.
PMID: 11930658BACKGROUNDGuan W, Zheng J, Gao Y, Jiang C, An J, Yu X, Liu W. Leukotriene D4 bronchial provocation test: methodology and diagnostic value. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 May;28(5):797-803. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.678936. Epub 2012 May 3.
PMID: 22435894BACKGROUNDGuan W, Zheng J, Gao Y, Jiang C, Xie Y, An J, Yu X, Liu W, Zhong N. Leukotriene D4 and methacholine bronchial provocation tests for identifying leukotriene-responsiveness subtypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Feb;131(2):332-8.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
PMID: 23040886BACKGROUNDGuan WJ, Zheng JP, Gao Y, Jiang CY, Shi X, Xie YQ, Liu QX, Jiang M, An JY, Yu XX, Liu WT, Zhong LP, Wu ZP, Zhong NS. Impulse oscillometry for leukotriene D4 inhalation challenge in asthma. Respir Care. 2013 Dec;58(12):2120-6. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02417. Epub 2013 May 28.
PMID: 23716710BACKGROUNDGuan WJ, Zheng JP, Gao Y, Jiang CY, Xie YQ, Shi X, Zhu Z, An JY, Yu XX, Liu WT, Zhong NS. Responsiveness to leukotriene D4 and methacholine for predicting efficacy of montelukast in asthma. J Thorac Dis. 2013 Jun;5(3):298-301. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.02.01.
PMID: 23825762BACKGROUNDGuan WJ, Zheng JP, Shi X, Xie YQ, Jiang CY, Gao Y, Zhu Z, An JY, Yu XX, Liu WT. Response--dose ratio is a surrogate of cumulative provocative dosage for bronchial provocation tests in asthma. Lung. 2014 Oct;192(5):701-9. doi: 10.1007/s00408-014-9612-7. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
PMID: 24958577BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2014
First Posted
December 17, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2007
Last Updated
December 17, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12