The Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Training in Healthy and ACL-Injured Adolescent Females
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recently, there has been a dramatic rise in the number of children participating in competitive sports. Adolescents involved in sports that require cutting, pivoting or body contact are at greatest risk for sustaining an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture of the knee, however, appropriate management remains controversial. The surgical technique is commonly performed in the adult population has been associated with risks for growth disturbance when performed on skeletally immature individuals. Therefore, the recommended standard of care in children is to initially follow a non-surgical management protocol that allows a patient to skeletally mature prior to ultimately receiving surgical reconstruction. Unfortunately, current non-surgical management protocols are ineffective at enhancing knee joint stability and dynamic function. There has been no research to indicate the most appropriate exercise program for the ACL deficient skeletally immature individual. A neuromuscular exercise program proven to be safe and effective in the ACL deficient adult population is perturbation training. In adolescents, research suggests neuromuscular exercises can reduce the rate of ACL injuries by 50%. However, currently there is no research investigating the benefits of a neuromuscular exercise on the management of a skeletally immature ACL-deficient individual. The results of this investigation will provide researchers and clinicians valuable information on the effect of neuromuscular perturbation exercises on knee joint stability and function immediately following injury. This has the potential to minimize the development of secondary meniscal tears and premature joint degeneration commonly demonstrated following an ACL injury.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 14, 2015
August 1, 2015
1 year
September 16, 2014
August 12, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) at week 7
The SEBT is a valid and reliable non-instrumented test to evaluate dynamic balance in healthy and ACL-injured subjects, however use in the skeletally immature population is lacking in the literature. The subjects perform a series of single-limb squats using the non-stance limb to reach maximally to touch a point along 1 of 8 designated lines on the ground. The reach distance is normalized to the subject's leg length to allow comparison of performance between limbs (injured vs non-injured), between subjects (healthy vs ACL-injured) and before \& after an intervention to quantify deficits or improvements in dynamic postural-control. Subjects will perform 4 familiarization trials in each direction, as indicated by previous research. Both limbs will be tested in each direction with the average of the 3 test trails being used for data analysis.
week 7
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline in Y-Balance Test at week 7
week 7
Change from baseline in Y-Balance Test at week 13
week13
Change from baseline in Star Excursion Balance Test at week 13
week 13
Other Outcomes (4)
Change from baseline in Quadriceps and Hamstring Strength at week 7
week 7
Change from baseline in Quadriceps and Hamstring Strength at week 13
week 13
Change from baseline in Pedi- International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at week 7
week 7
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Neuromuscular Training - No Exercise
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will participate in 5 weeks of neuromuscular training followed by 5 weeks of no exercise intervention
No Exercise - Neuromuscular Training
EXPERIMENTALNo exercises will be administered for 5 weeks, followed by 5 weeks of neuromuscular Training.
Interventions
The established Neuromuscular Training (NMT) protocol is supervised, progressive program in which the patient maintains balance on three different support surfaces while a clinician administers purposeful manipulations of the support system.1 The patient maintains a single-leg stance on the rollerboard and tiltboard surfaces, and a two-leg stance with one foot on a roller board while the other is on a platform. Participants will complete two training sessions per week, for five weeks for a total of 10 training sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages 10-14.
- Radiographic evidence of skeletally immaturity at the knee joint.
- ACL-injured patients require a clinical examination and a KT-1000 test of \> 3mm compared with the contralateral knee to confirm a uni-lateral ACL injury diagnosis.
- Pass the standardized screening protocol, which includes:
- i. No evidence of joint effusion via swipe test ii. Full passive knee joint range of motion iii. Full active knee extension during a straight leg raise test iv. Quadriceps femoris maximum voluntary isometric contraction force on the involved limb equivalent to 75% of that on the uninvolved limb v. Tolerance for 10 consecutive single-leg hops on the involved limb without pain.
You may not qualify if:
- Symptomatic meniscus or concomitant knee ligament injuries.
- Recent history (within the 6 months) of a traumatic head (concussion), hip, knee or ankle injury.
- Reports more than one episode of the knee giving way or buckling resulting in pain and joint effusion from the time of injury. The mechanism at the time of injury is not included.
- Actively participating in another rehabilitation protocol during the course of the study.
- Unwillingness or inability to return for follow-up test sessions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pan Am Clinic
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3E4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jason Peeler, PhD
University of Manitoba
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2014
First Posted
December 15, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 14, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08