NCT02315794

Brief Summary

Different studies have proposed the use of zirconia abutments to improve the aesthetic outcomes in the anterior sextant, however the results have been inconclusive. A tendency towards a better aesthetic result with the use of zirconia instead of titanium abutments was observed, although more technical complications were also recorded.The use of zirconia abutments in the anterior maxillary region showed a tendency towards better matching, although differences were not significant. In addition, with these abutments more technical complications were observed, what increased the cost and time. More studies with larger samples and longer observations periods are needed to recommend the use of zirconia abutments for this clinical situation

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2009

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2010

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2011

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 6, 2014

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 12, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

December 12, 2014

Status Verified

December 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

December 6, 2014

Last Update Submit

December 9, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

aesthetic outcometitanium abutmentzirconia abutment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • change from baseline in the anatomic form and surface characteristics of the peri implant mucosa

    the following parameters were assessed by means of standardized photographs: contour of the labial surface of the mucosa and its colour; when compared to the adjacent teeth , penalty points were assigned ( 0 = excellent; 1 or 2 = satisfactory; 3 or 4 = moderate; 5 ore more, poor).

    one month and one year after the placement of the definitive crowns

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • change from baseline in crestal bone levels

    one month and one year after placing the definitive crown

  • change from baseline in interdental soft tissue position

    one month and one year after the placement of the definitive crowns

  • change from baseline in thickness of the peri implant mucosa

    one month and one year after the placement of the definitive crowns

Study Arms (2)

SPI®ART

EXPERIMENTAL

in test group after a three month healing period a zirconia abutment was connected to the implant to realize the prosthetic restoration

Device: SPI®ART

SPI®EASY

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

in control group a three month healing period a titanium abutment was connected to the implant for the prosthetic restoration

Device: SPI®EASY

Interventions

SPI®ARTDEVICE

implant prothetic restoration using a yttrium oxide stabilized zirconia abutment

SPI®ART
SPI®EASYDEVICE

implant prosthetic restoration using a commercially pure titanium grade 4 abutment

SPI®EASY

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • mono-edentulism condition in the aesthetic zone
  • minimum of 2 mm of keratinized gingiva

You may not qualify if:

  • systemic diseases

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Siena University, Department of Periodontology, Policlinico Le Scotte Siena.

Siena, Siena, 53100, Italy

Location

Tuscan School of Dentistry

Siena, Siena, 53100, Italy

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Meijndert L, Raghoebar GM. A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues--the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):645-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01128.x.

    PMID: 16307570BACKGROUND
  • Ferrantino L, Carrillo de Albornoz A, Sanz M. Five-year outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing single-tooth implant-supported restoration with either zirconia or titanium abutments. J Clin Periodontol. 2023 Jun;50(6):744-754. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13787. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

Study Officials

  • nicola baldini, oral surgeon

    tuscal school of dental medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
oral surgeon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2014

First Posted

December 12, 2014

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion

January 1, 2010

Study Completion

February 1, 2011

Last Updated

December 12, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-12

Locations