NCT02314260

Brief Summary

To have an early more precise way to predict failed induction in patients undergoing elective termination of pregnancy \& those more likely to undergo caesarian section,this will Spare patients with decreased chances of favorable induction a long and exhausting trial of labour with increased probability of complications and an emergency caesarian

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2014

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2014

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 6, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 11, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 16, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

January 16, 2015

Status Verified

January 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

December 6, 2014

Results QC Date

December 15, 2014

Last Update Submit

January 8, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

labour inductioncervical lengthtrans-vaginal assessment of cervical lengthBishop score

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) for Modified Bishop Score

    to predict failed induction and comparing it to the area under curve for bishop score to find out which test is more accurate in predicting caesarean section, The positive actual state is failed induction and performing Caesarean Section.The positive actual state is failed induction, the true positive rate (Sensitivity) is plotted in function of the false positive rate (100-Specificity). So as the numbers approaches 1, induction fails, the Y-axis of the curve is sensitivity and the x- axis is (1-specificity).

    5 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Area Under Curve for The Bishop Score

    5 months

  • Cut Off Value for The Modified Bishop Score

    5 months

  • Cut Off Value for Bishop Score

    5 months

Study Arms (1)

Labour Induction

80 primigravidas undergoing bishop score calculation, trans-vaginal ultrasound assessment of cervical length \&, Modified bishop score calculation, then induction of labour at our hospital.

Other: bishop score calculationOther: Trans-vaginal ultrasoundOther: Modified bishop score calculationProcedure: labour induction

Interventions

Assessment of bishop score by vaginal examination

Labour Induction

trans-vaginal ultrasound assessment of cervical length.

Labour Induction

using the cervical length and the original bishop score to calculate modified bishop score

Labour Induction

Induction of labor was carried out as per our hospital's standard protocol.

Labour Induction

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 34 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

80 primigravidas undergoing induction of labour at our hospital in a prospective study were subjected to history taking, examination, investigations \& ultrasonography. Indication for pregnancy termination was explained to each patient and a written consent was obtained.

You may qualify if:

  • Primigravida Singleton pregnancy with mature fetus at term indicated for termination of pregnancy.
  • Cephalic presentation.
  • Medical indications for termination of pregnancy e.g.: Pre-eclampsia, uncontrolled diabetes at term..e.t.c,
  • Post-term pregnancy.
  • Fetal indication: signs of fetal compromise e.g.: decreased biophysical profile, poor umbilical Doppler indices, diminished liquor.
  • premature rupture of membranes (PROM) not going into spontaneous labor within 24 hours since onset.
  • Intrauterine fetal death (IUFD).

You may not qualify if:

  • they had true labor pains or clear onset of labor as diagnosed by cervical changes.
  • Previous uterine surgery (scared uterus).
  • Cephalo-pelvic disproportion.
  • Mal-presentations
  • Severe oligo-hydramnios i.e.: amniotic fluid index Less than 5.
  • Twin pregnancy.
  • Fetal macrosomia. -Growth beyond a specific threshold (weight above 4000g) 8) Placenta previa.
  • \) Fetal bradycardia in case of living fetus.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

11562

Ḩadā’iq al Qubbah, Cairo Governorate, 11562, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • BISHOP EH. PELVIC SCORING FOR ELECTIVE INDUCTION. Obstet Gynecol. 1964 Aug;24:266-8. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14199536BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Labor, Induced

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Delivery, ObstetricObstetric Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Ahmed Kamel
Organization
kasr EL alini

Study Officials

  • Ahmed M Kamel, M.D

    Lecturer of obstetrics & Gynecology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer Of obstetrics & Gynecology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2014

First Posted

December 11, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

January 16, 2015

Results First Posted

January 16, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-01

Locations