Efficacy of Enhancing Low Vision Mobility Thru Visual Training in Virtual World
1 other identifier
observational
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Low vision patients have difficulty acquiring sufficient visual information in a timely manner for the purpose of performing challenging daily tasks, such as traveling independently and safely through busy streets. The advance of virtual reality techniques has provided a potential platform for training low vision patients to use their remaining vision more efficiently, but the key issue is always whether the patient's visual experiences in a virtual world can be transferred to the real world. The proposed study is designed to provide definite answer to this question.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Sep 2010
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedMay 27, 2015
December 1, 2014
4.5 years
December 3, 2014
May 25, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The percentage of dangerous street crossing decisions and the street crossing decision safety scores
The percentage of dangerous street crossing decisions is determined at real street corners during pre- and post-training evaluation sessions. The subject is asked to say "GO" when she feels it is the safest time to cross the street. A crossing decision is scored as dangerous if it is initiated in the red traffic light cycle or if there is \< 25% of the "WALK" cycle left. The percentage is the total number of dangerous decisions divided by the total number of crossing decisions made during one evaluation session. The safety of a crossing decision is further quantified by recording the decision timing using a stopwatch and by converting the recorded time to a safety score. The safety score is a continuous scale between 0 and 1.0. The larger the safety score, the safer is the crossing decision. A statistically significant reduction in the percentage dangerous crossing decisions and an increase in the safety scores after training is an indication of successful skill learning and transfer.
3-5 1-hour visits
Study Arms (2)
Low vision (virtual street training)
Low vision subjects trained in virtual streets and observed in real streets
Low vision (real street training)
Low vision subjects trained in real streets and observed in real streets
Eligibility Criteria
Low vision participants will be recruited from the patient populations of the Clinics of UAB School of Optometry and UAB Center for Low Vision Rehabilitation
You may qualify if:
- Ambulatory and have independent traveling as one of their rehabilitation goals.
- Participants with central field loss should have best corrected binocular visual acuity between 20/200 and 20/1000, but with relatively intact peripheral visual field (\>80o).
- Participants with peripheral visual field loss should have \>20/63 visual acuity and no more than 20 deg diameter but not less than 8 deg diameter visual field in the better eye.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who have a mixture of central and peripheral field loss.
- Previous or current recipient of O\&M training.
- Participants who have plans to receive O\&M training during the study period.
- Age younger than 19 or older than 81.
- Significant cognitive impairment as determined with the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (≥2 errors); inability to understand and speak English.
- Severe hearing impairment that interferes with interactions with O\&M specialists.
- Inability or unwillingness to make visits required by the study.
- Not living in the Birmingham-Jefferson county area.
- Persons who have a history of epilepsy or who are prone to motion sickness or simulator aftereffect, determined by an epileptic seizure history inquiry and a Motion Sickness History Questionnaire.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Clinical Eye Research Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lei Liu, PhD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2014
First Posted
December 8, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 27, 2015
Record last verified: 2014-12