Impact of Herniation on WFNS Grading in Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage - a SWISS SOS Observational Trial
hWFNS
1 other identifier
observational
250
1 country
8
Brief Summary
All patients (≥18 years) with a spontaneous SAH proven by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or lumbar puncture will be considered for this trial. Upon presentation to a neurosurgical centre the patients will be treated according to the local protocol. Upon admission the patient is clinically evaluated for occurrence of clinical signs of brain herniation syndromes (anisocoria, bilateral dilated pupils, posturing). Usually first line treatment includes neurological resuscitation (placement external cerebrospinal fluid drainage in case of hydrocephalus, treatment of seizure, and general intensive care measures). Hereafter, the patient is clinically evaluated for a second time. The patients will be graded according to the usual WFNS scale and the modified "herniation WFNS" scale. The whole treatment of the patient will be according to local clinical protocols. Outcome will be measured at six and twelve months by trained investigators who are unaware of clinical data. The primary endpoint is the difference of specificities of the WFNS and hWFNS with respect to poor outcome (mRS 4-6) at 6 months after initial haemorrhage. Given that specificity and sensitivity are negatively correlated, difference in sensitivity will be the second primary outcome. The null hypothesis to be tested is that the ratio of the true negative rates (specificity) of the hWFNS and WFNS scores is 1.35 i.e. the new score will detect 35% more patients as truly negative (good outcome) as compared to the old score. In addition and because of the negative correlation between specificity and sensitivity we will also test that the ratio of the true positive rate (sensitivity) is not below 0.82 i.e. the new score will not more than 18% less patients as truly positive (poor outcome).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2020
CompletedSeptember 3, 2020
September 1, 2020
4.5 years
November 18, 2014
September 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Positive predictive value of the WFNS and hWFNS with respect to poor outcome (mRS 4-6) at 6 months after initial hemorrhage
Comparison of the two scales (calculation); the basis is the mRS at 6 months
At 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Composite of dependency and mortality as assessed by the mRS (4-6)
At 12 months
Alternate WFNS Scale (WFNS compared to WFNS IV = GCS 6-12 and WFNS V=GCS 3-5)
On admission, i.e. at first contact with a neurosurgical Unit, and after neurological resuscitation, i.e. within 6 hours after admission
Residential care
At 6 and 12 months
Timing of WFNS grading
Before and after neurological resuscitation, i.e. within 6 hours after admission
Recurrent SAH
At 6 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
No clinical signs of brain herniation syndrome
Poor grade (WFNS IV and V) SAH patients without clinical signs of brain herniation syndrome
Clinical signs of brain herniation syndrome
Poor grade (WFNS IV and V) SAH patients with clinical signs of brain herniation syndrome
Interventions
Patients will be clinically assessed whether they present clinical signs of brain herniation syndromes
Eligibility Criteria
All patients (≥18 years) with a proven spontaneous SAH will be considered for this trial
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent of the patient or consent of patient's next of kin
- Spontaneous SAH
- Age: ≥18
- Glasgow coma scale (GCS) ≤ 12. In intubated patients the GCS assessment will be performed after cessation of sedation or if not possible the last GCS score before intubation will be used
You may not qualify if:
- SAH due to any other cause or structural abnormality of the brain (trauma, dissection, arterio-venous malformation, dural arterio-venous fistula)
- Foreseeable difficulties in follow-up due to geographic reasons (e.g., patients living abroad)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
Kantonsspital Aarau
Aarau, 5001, Switzerland
University Hospital Basel
Basel, 4031, Switzerland
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bern
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève
Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
CHUV Lausanne
Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
Ospedale Regionale di Lugano - Civico e Italiano
Lugano, 6900, Switzerland
Kantonsspital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, 9007, Switzerland
Universitätsspital Zürich
Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
Related Publications (12)
Bailes JE, Spetzler RF, Hadley MN, Baldwin HZ. Management morbidity and mortality of poor-grade aneurysm patients. J Neurosurg. 1990 Apr;72(4):559-66. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.72.4.0559.
PMID: 2319314BACKGROUNDBergui M, Bradac GB. Acute endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms in poor-grade patients. Neuroradiology. 2004 Feb;46(2):161-4. doi: 10.1007/s00234-003-1143-5. Epub 2003 Dec 20.
PMID: 14689126BACKGROUNDHaug T, Sorteberg A, Finset A, Lindegaard KF, Lundar T, Sorteberg W. Cognitive functioning and health-related quality of life 1 year after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in preoperative comatose patients (Hunt and Hess Grade V patients). Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):475-84; discussion 484-5. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365364.87303.AC.
PMID: 20124932BACKGROUNDLe Roux PD, Elliott JP, Newell DW, Grady MS, Winn HR. Predicting outcome in poor-grade patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective review of 159 aggressively managed cases. J Neurosurg. 1996 Jul;85(1):39-49. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.85.1.0039.
PMID: 8683281BACKGROUNDMocco J, Ransom ER, Komotar RJ, Schmidt JM, Sciacca RR, Mayer SA, Connolly ES Jr. Preoperative prediction of long-term outcome in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2006 Sep;59(3):529-38; discussion 529-38. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000228680.22550.A2.
PMID: 16955034BACKGROUNDWostrack M, Sandow N, Vajkoczy P, Schatlo B, Bijlenga P, Schaller K, Kehl V, Harmening K, Ringel F, Ryang YM, Friedrich B, Stoffel M, Meyer B. Subarachnoid haemorrhage WFNS grade V: is maximal treatment worthwhile? Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Apr;155(4):579-86. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1634-z. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
PMID: 23397308BACKGROUNDBederson JB, Connolly ES Jr, Batjer HH, Dacey RG, Dion JE, Diringer MN, Duldner JE Jr, Harbaugh RE, Patel AB, Rosenwasser RH; American Heart Association. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 2009 Mar;40(3):994-1025. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.191395. Epub 2009 Jan 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 19164800BACKGROUNDTeasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974 Jul 13;2(7872):81-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 4136544BACKGROUNDvan den Berg R, Foumani M, Schroder RD, Peerdeman SM, Horn J, Bipat S, Vandertop WP. Predictors of outcome in World Federation of Neurologic Surgeons grade V aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2722-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182282a70.
PMID: 21765356BACKGROUNDGiraldo EA, Mandrekar JN, Rubin MN, Dupont SA, Zhang Y, Lanzino G, Wijdicks EF, Rabinstein AA. Timing of clinical grade assessment and poor outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2012 Jul;117(1):15-9. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.JNS11706. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
PMID: 22540398BACKGROUNDGoldberg J, Z'Graggen WJ, Hlavica M, Branca M, Marbacher S, D'Alonzo D, Fandino J, Stienen MN, Neidert MC, Burkhardt JK, Regli L, Seule M, Roethlisberger M, Guzman R, Zumofen DW, Maduri R, Daniel RT, El Rahal A, Corniola MV, Bijlenga P, Schaller K, Rolz R, Scheiwe C, Shah M, Heiland DH, Schnell O, Beck J, Raabe A, Fung C. Quality of Life After Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2023 May 1;92(5):1052-1057. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002332. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
PMID: 36700700DERIVEDRaabe A, Beck J, Goldberg J, Z Graggen WJ, Branca M, Marbacher S, D'Alonzo D, Fandino J, Stienen MN, Neidert MC, Burkhardt JK, Regli L, Hlavica M, Seule M, Roethlisberger M, Guzman R, Zumofen DW, Maduri R, Daniel RT, El Rahal A, Corniola MV, Bijlenga P, Schaller K, Rolz R, Scheiwe C, Shah M, Heiland DH, Schnell O, Fung C. Herniation World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Scale Improves Prediction of Outcome in Patients With Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2022 Jul;53(7):2346-2351. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.036699. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
PMID: 35317612DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian Fung, MD
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2014
First Posted
December 1, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
August 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09