Improving Bowel Cleansing With a Smart Phone Application
Improving the Quality of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Using a Smart Phone Application
1 other identifier
interventional
260
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Getting ready for a colonoscopy is difficult and involves a lot of steps. The information given to patients is very important to adherence to treatment. The investigators have created a novel smart phone application (SPA) aimed to increased bowel preparation quality and patient satisfaction, using different educational tools.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jan 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 13, 2015
CompletedOctober 14, 2016
January 1, 2015
5 months
November 24, 2014
December 2, 2014
October 13, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bowel Preparation Was Evaluated Using the Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS). The Scale Was the Primary Outcome Measure
The quality of bowel cleansing is evaluated after colonoscopy (Day 1). Baseline the patients initiated low fiber diet in the 24 hours prior to colonoscopy. The HCS uses a 5-point qualitative scale in 5 separate colon segments. HCS is the sum of 5 segments, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 20 (best possible outcome). Global score assesses the quality of bowel cleansing: Successful (A or B) / unsuccessful (C or D). A: All segments scored 3 or 4; B: One or more segments scored 2; C: One or more segments scored 1; and D: One or more segments scored 0.
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient Satisfaction Were Assessed With a Specific Questionnaire
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Smart Phone Application (SPA) Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients assigned to SPA group were instructed on how to free-download the application onto their smartphone. Each patient enters the date and time of his colonoscopy and timed alerts appeared on the phone to alert the patient of the next step in bowel preparation. In addition to the alerts, the app assists in bowel preparation by explaining the procedure, providing tips, examples of low fiber diet, and displaying pictures of preparation quality and educational video to explain how to prepare the purgative solution.Finally, the patient can obtain a checklist to confirm all steps.
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORWritten instructions with visual aids explaining the procedure and when to begin self-administration of the bowel solution
Interventions
Bowel preparation was evaluated using the Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS). The scale was the primary outcome measure
written instructions with visual aids explaining the procedure and when to begin self-administration of the bowel solution (control group).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective colonoscopy
- Owners of a smartphone
You may not qualify if:
- No owners of a smartphone
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jul;58(1):76-9. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.294.
PMID: 12838225BACKGROUNDFroehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):378-84. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02776-2.
PMID: 15758907BACKGROUNDSpiegel BM, Talley J, Shekelle P, Agarwal N, Snyder B, Bolus R, Kurzbard N, Chan M, Ho A, Kaneshiro M, Cordasco K, Cohen H. Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 May;106(5):875-83. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.75. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
PMID: 21483463BACKGROUNDTae JW, Lee JC, Hong SJ, Han JP, Lee YH, Chung JH, Yoon HG, Ko BM, Cho JY, Lee JS, Lee MS. Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Oct;76(4):804-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.026. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
PMID: 22840295BACKGROUNDPrakash SR, Verma S, McGowan J, Smith BE, Shroff A, Gibson GH, Cheng M, Lowe Ii D, Gopal K, Mohanty SR. Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using an educational video. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec;27(12):696-700. doi: 10.1155/2013/292636.
PMID: 24340313BACKGROUND
Related Links
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga García
- Organization
- Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga Garcíaa, M.D.; Ph.D.
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.; Ph.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2014
First Posted
December 1, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 14, 2016
Results First Posted
January 13, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-01