NCT02299674

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the path and velocity of the center of mass (CoM) and center of pressure (CoP) during double support of persons walking with a unilateral above-the-knee prosthesis and determine the effects of prosthetic foot stiffness and effective length on CoM and CoP.Persons with a lower limb amputation walk with compensatory movements that affect the smooth trajectory of the center of mass (CoM) during weight transfer. The lack of control in the foot/ankle complex reduces fine motor movements, influencing the progression of the CoM and transfer of ground reaction forces represented by the center of pressure (CoP). Without control of the ankle joint, prosthetic users "fall" off of their trailing prosthetic limb during weight transfer, resulting in much more abrupt CoM and CoP transfers from trailing to leading limb. These abrupt movements during transfer not only increase stress on the sound limb, but also decrease the subject's energy efficiency during ambulation. The current study will further examine the CoP path and velocity in relation to the CoM path and velocity during double support of men with a transfemoral prosthesis, as well as explore how prosthetic foot ankle stiffness and effective length affects the CoP path and velocity.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2014

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2014

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 19, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 24, 2014

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2015

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

November 19, 2014

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Center of Pressure Velocity

    The Center of Pressure velocity in the X and Y direction \[cm/sec\] will be collected using a motion capture system and forceplates during a single session. This data will be collected during a single 2.5 hour data collection session. The time frame is specifically the Double Support phase of the gait cycle.

    Double Support Phase of Gait Cycle (2.5 hour)

Study Arms (1)

Persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation

Other: Level overground ambulation

Interventions

Persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation who are ambulatory with a prosthesis and no assistive device.

You may qualify if:

  • Participants must have a transfermoral amputation and use an above-the-knee prosthesis with an articulating knee joint on a daily basis.
  • Participants must be male.
  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years, but less than 65 years.
  • Participants must have no known pathology or comorbidites that would affect their ambulatory ability
  • Ability to tolerate walking for a minimum of 100 yards over the course of a two and a half hour time period.
  • Ability to walk one block without needing to rest.

You may not qualify if:

  • Use of ambulatory aids such as canes or crutches.
  • Any medical or psychosocial condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could jeopardize the subject's participation, and compliance with the study criteria.
  • Bilateral amputations.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

V.A. Long Beach Healthcare System

Long Beach, California, 90822, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Au, S. K., Weber, J., & Herr, H. (2009). Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Improves Walking Metabolic Economy. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 25(1), 51-66.

    BACKGROUND
  • Donelan JM, Kram R, Kuo AD. Simultaneous positive and negative external mechanical work in human walking. J Biomech. 2002 Jan;35(1):117-24. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00169-5.

    PMID: 11747890BACKGROUND
  • Herr HM, Grabowski AM. Bionic ankle-foot prosthesis normalizes walking gait for persons with leg amputation. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 7;279(1728):457-64. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1194. Epub 2011 Jul 13.

    PMID: 21752817BACKGROUND
  • Hof AL, van Bockel RM, Schoppen T, Postema K. Control of lateral balance in walking. Experimental findings in normal subjects and above-knee amputees. Gait Posture. 2007 Feb;25(2):250-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.04.013. Epub 2006 Jun 5.

    PMID: 16740390BACKGROUND
  • Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res. 1990 May;8(3):383-92. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100080310.

    PMID: 2324857BACKGROUND
  • Nolan KJ, Yarossi M. Weight transfer analysis in adults with hemiplegia using ankle foot orthosis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011 Mar;35(1):45-53. doi: 10.1177/0309364610393061.

    PMID: 21515889BACKGROUND
  • Orendurff MS, Segal AD, Klute GK, Berge JS, Rohr ES, Kadel NJ. The effect of walking speed on center of mass displacement. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 Nov-Dec;41(6A):829-34. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.10.0150.

    PMID: 15685471BACKGROUND
  • Schmid M, Beltrami G, Zambarbieri D, Verni G. Centre of pressure displacements in trans-femoral amputees during gait. Gait Posture. 2005 Apr;21(3):255-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.01.016.

    PMID: 15760740BACKGROUND
  • Turnbull GI, Charteris J, Wall JC. Deficiencies in standing weight shifts by ambulant hemiplegic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Apr;77(4):356-62. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90084-2.

    PMID: 8607759BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Health System Specialist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2014

First Posted

November 24, 2014

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion

November 1, 2015

Study Completion

May 1, 2017

Last Updated

May 3, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Locations