Safety and Efficacy of Azzalure/Dysport, Restylane/Emervel Filler and Restylane Skinbooster Treatment
An Evaluator-blinded Multi-center Study of Combined Treatment With Azzalure/Dysport, Restylane/Emervel Filler and Restylane Skinbooster as Compared to Single Treatment With Either Azzalure/Dysport Alone or Restylane/Emervel Filler Alone
1 other identifier
interventional
65
3 countries
4
Brief Summary
The efficacy and safety, as well as subject satisfaction will be evaluated after single treatment with Azzalure/Dysport alone or Restylane/Emervel filler alone followed by repeated combined treatment with Azzalure/Dysport, Restylane/Emervel filler and Restylane Skinbooster. Subjects will be followed for up to 18 months after initial treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Nov 2014
Typical duration for phase_4
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 30, 2019
CompletedOctober 14, 2022
September 1, 2019
2.3 years
October 31, 2014
June 25, 2019
October 10, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Subjects With Improvement in Global Facial Aesthetic Appearance
Percentage of subjects showing superior global facial aesthetic appearance at month 7 compared to month 1. Assessment of global facial aesthetic appearance was based on blinded evaluations of subject's youthful appearance (e.g. lack of facial volume loss, lack of static wrinkles and fine lines, good skin quality, and satisfactory result after aesthetic treatment). The blinded evaluators retrospectively reviewed photographs from visit for each subject and answered the following question: "At which set of photographs does the subject show superior global facial aesthetic appearance?".
7 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Percentage of Subjects With Improvement in Global Facial Aesthetic Appearance
1, 7 and 13 months
Number of Subjects Improved on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Blinded Evaluator
1, 7, and 13 months
Number of Participants Satisfied With Facial Appearance
7 and 13 months
Number of Participants for Which the Investigator is Satisfied With the Outcome
7 and 13 months
Percentage of Subjects Improved in Wrinkle Severity Score
7 and 13 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Azzalure/Dysport as single treatment
EXPERIMENTALAzzalure/Dysport as single treatment at initial treatment
Filler as single treatment
EXPERIMENTALFiller as single treatment at initial treatment
Interventions
Glabellar lines
Facial tissue augmentation
Facial skin rejuvenation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects aged 35 to 50 years old
- Subjects with the intention to undergo facial aesthetic treatment and who are likely to benefit from a combination of injection treatments and the benefit can be shown by improvements in their global facial aesthetic appearance and satisfaction.
- Subjects with nasolabial folds assessed as mild or moderate.
- Subjects with upper facial lines to be treated (at least two of glabellar lines, crow´s feet and/or forehead lines) assessed as moderate or severe, when the severity of the lines has an important psychological impact on the subject.
- Subjects with signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Obvious facial sagging (major loss of facial fat/volume).
- Signs or symptoms of eyelid ptosis or signs of compensatory frontalis muscle activity.
- Heavily scarred or sun-damaged facial skin.
- Active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions, such as infection, psoriasis and herpes zoster/herpes simplex near or on the areas to be treated.
- Cancerous or pre-cancerous lesions in the areas to be treated.
- Facial tissue augmenting therapy or revitalization treatment with hyaluronic acid (HA) or collagen, or botulinum toxin treatment during the last 12 months.
- Procedures or treatments inducing an active dermal response such as laser, Intense Pulsed Light, chemical peeling, microdermabrasion, retinoids within the last 6 months.
- Any aesthetic surgery of the face.
- Permanent implant or aesthetic treatment with non-HA or non-collagen products in the face.
- History of severe keloids and/or hypertrophic scars.
- Neuromuscular junctional disorders (e.g. myasthenia gravis, Eaton Lambert syndrome or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) or history of dysphagia and aspiration.
- Known hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid, botulinum toxin, lidocaine hydrochloride or other amide-type anesthetics.
- History of autoimmune diseases.
- Concomitant anticoagulant therapy and therapy with inhibitors of platelet aggregation (e.g. aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs \[NSAIDs\]), Omega-3 or vitamin E within 10 days before study treatment, or a history of bleeding disorders.
- Immunosuppressive therapy, chemotherapy, or systemic corticosteroids within the last 3 months prior to baseline visit.
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Galderma R&Dlead
Study Sites (4)
Brazilian Center for Studies in Dermatology
Porto Alegre, 90570-040, Brazil
Mediti Center
Paris, Antibes, 06160, France
Centre Medical Saint-Jean
Arras, 62000, France
Akademikliniken
Stockholm, 115 42, Sweden
Related Publications (1)
Heden P, Hexsel D, Cartier H, Bergentz P, Delmar H, Camozzato F, Siega C, Skoglund C, Edwartz C, Norberg M, Kestemont P. Effective and Safe Repeated Full-Face Treatments With AbobotulinumtoxinA, Hyaluronic Acid Filler, and Skin Boosting Hyaluronic Acid. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019 Jul 1;18(7):682-689.
PMID: 31334927RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Small number of subjects
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Head of Development
- Organization
- Q-Med AB
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philippe Kestemont, MD
Clinique Science et Beauté, Antibes, France
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2014
First Posted
November 21, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 14, 2022
Results First Posted
September 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09