Study Stopped
Difficulty including patients
Fractional Laser in Combination With UVB Therapy in Vitiligo Patients
Fractional Laser Abrasion in Combination With UVB Therapy in Vitiligo Patients: a Randomized Controlled Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: Vitiligo is a common skin disorder that can impair a patient's quality of life. Many depigmented lesions in vitiligo patients remain therapy resistant for medical treatment. Therefore new therapeutic options in these patients are necessary. Currently, dermabrasion by conventional or fractional laser therapy in combination with NB-UVB therapy and steroids appears to be effective in therapy resistant areas. However, little literature on this combination is available. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and patient safety of (1)fractional CO2-laser treatment in combination with NB- UVB,(2) fractional CO2-laser treatment in combination with NB- UVB and topical corticosteroids versus NB-UVB treatment alone(3) Study design: Prospective observer blinded randomised intra-patient controlled study. Study population: 23 patients ≥ 18 years with non segmental vitiligo who receive NB-UVB treatment at the Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders (SNIP) at the Academic Medical Centre University of Amsterdam. We will include patients with 3 depigmented lesions that are resistant to NB- UVB treatment after 3 to 6 months. Methods: Three NB-UVB resistant depigmented regions on the trunk or extremities will be randomly allocated to;(1) NB-UVB treatment in combination with fractional CO2 laser abrasion, or (2) NB-UVB treatment in combination with fractional CO2 laser abrasion and topical steroids, or (3) NB-UVB treatment alone. NB-UVB treatment and topical steroids will be given according to the standard treatment protocol of the SNIP and continued for at least 6 months. Two and 6 months after the laser treatment, the percentage of repigmentation of the lesions will be assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started May 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2015
CompletedApril 18, 2016
April 1, 2016
6 months
November 7, 2014
April 15, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Repigmentation % with sheets
% of repigmentation
6 mo after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Global assessment physician
6 months after treatment
Global assessment patient
6 months after treatment
Visual assessment of hyperpigmentation/hypopigmentation/scar formation
6 months after treatment
Global assessment of repigmentation physician
6months after treatment
Other Outcomes (2)
Adverse events
6 months after treatment
Color difference between erythema and (re)pigmentation
6 months after treatment
Study Arms (3)
Laser+fluticason+UVB
EXPERIMENTALThe treatment site will be superficially abraded using an ablative fractional laser (10,600nm CO2 laser). 5 days after laser therapy topical steroids (fluticasone cream) 4 times a week will be applied on the treatment site until the end of the study.
Laser+UVB
EXPERIMENTALIn one session the treatment site will be superficially abraded using an ablative fractional laser (10,600nm CO2 laser).
UVB
ACTIVE COMPARATORAs control site, 1 similar depigmented lesion will be used. This site will receive the same NB-UVB treatment as sites 1 and 2.
Interventions
NB-UVB therapy (according to the standard treatment protocol of the SNIP, which the patient is already been treated with) will be continued for both treated and control sites during 6 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with non segmental (generalised) vitiligo visiting the Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders
- receiving NB- UVB treatment for 3 to 6 months
- Age \>18 years
- At least 3 therapy resistant vitiligo lesions on the extremities or trunk larger than 5x5 cm or one vitiligo lesion on the extremities or trunk of at least 5x15 cm.
- Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Skin type I
- Recurrent HSV skin infections
- Hypertrophic scars
- Keloid
- Cardial insufficiency
- Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding
- Patients not competent to understand what the procedures involved
- Patients with a personal history of melanoma or non-melanoma skin cancer
- Patients with atypical nevi.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Academic Medical Centre
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Related Publications (13)
Garg T, Chander R, Jain A. Combination of microdermabrasion and 5-fluorouracil to induce repigmentation in vitiligo: an observational study. Dermatol Surg. 2011 Dec;37(12):1763-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02127.x. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
PMID: 21834930BACKGROUNDShin J, Lee JS, Hann SK, Oh SH. Combination treatment by 10 600 nm ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser and narrowband ultraviolet B in refractory nonsegmental vitiligo: a prospective, randomized half-body comparative study. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Mar;166(3):658-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10723.x. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
PMID: 22050270BACKGROUNDBayoumi W, Fontas E, Sillard L, Le Duff F, Ortonne JP, Bahadoran P, Lacour JP, Passeron T. Effect of a preceding laser dermabrasion on the outcome of combined therapy with narrowband ultraviolet B and potent topical steroids for treating nonsegmental vitiligo in resistant localizations. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jan;166(1):208-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10564.x. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
PMID: 21824124BACKGROUNDLinthorst Homan MW, Spuls PI, de Korte J, Bos JD, Sprangers MA, van der Veen JP. The burden of vitiligo: patient characteristics associated with quality of life. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Sep;61(3):411-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.03.022. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
PMID: 19577331BACKGROUNDOngenae K, Van Geel N, De Schepper S, Naeyaert JM. Effect of vitiligo on self-reported health-related quality of life. Br J Dermatol. 2005 Jun;152(6):1165-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06456.x.
PMID: 15948977BACKGROUNDAlikhan A, Felsten LM, Daly M, Petronic-Rosic V. Vitiligo: a comprehensive overview Part I. Introduction, epidemiology, quality of life, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, associations, histopathology, etiology, and work-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Sep;65(3):473-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.061.
PMID: 21839315BACKGROUNDDrake LA, Dinehart SM, Farmer ER, Goltz RW, Graham GF, Hordinsky MK, Lewis CW, Pariser DM, Skouge JW, Turner ML, Webster SB, Whitaker DC, Lowery BJ, Nordlund JJ, Grimes PE, Halder RM, Minus HR. Guidelines of care for vitiligo. American Academy of Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996 Oct;35(4):620-6. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(96)90691-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 8859294BACKGROUNDNjoo MD, Westerhof W. Vitiligo. Pathogenesis and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001;2(3):167-81. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200102030-00006.
PMID: 11705094BACKGROUNDTaieb A, Picardo M. Clinical practice. Vitiligo. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):160-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0804388. No abstract available.
PMID: 19129529BACKGROUNDTaieb A, Alomar A, Bohm M, Dell'anna ML, De Pase A, Eleftheriadou V, Ezzedine K, Gauthier Y, Gawkrodger DJ, Jouary T, Leone G, Moretti S, Nieuweboer-Krobotova L, Olsson MJ, Parsad D, Passeron T, Tanew A, van der Veen W, van Geel N, Whitton M, Wolkerstorfer A, Picardo M; Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF); European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV); Union Europe enne des Me decins Spe cialistes (UEMS). Guidelines for the management of vitiligo: the European Dermatology Forum consensus. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jan;168(1):5-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11197.x. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
PMID: 22860621BACKGROUNDLotti T, Buggiani G, Troiano M, Assad GB, Delescluse J, De Giorgi V, Hercogova J. Targeted and combination treatments for vitiligo. Comparative evaluation of different current modalities in 458 subjects. Dermatol Ther. 2008 Jul;21 Suppl 1:S20-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2008.00198.x.
PMID: 18727812BACKGROUNDFarajzadeh S, Daraei Z, Esfandiarpour I, Hosseini SH. The efficacy of pimecrolimus 1% cream combined with microdermabrasion in the treatment of nonsegmental childhood vitiligo: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Pediatr Dermatol. 2009 May-Jun;26(3):286-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2009.00926.x.
PMID: 19706089BACKGROUNDvan Geel N, Ongenae K, Naeyaert JM. Surgical techniques for vitiligo: a review. Dermatology. 2001;202(2):162-6. doi: 10.1159/000051626.
PMID: 11306848BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MSc MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2014
First Posted
November 14, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
November 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 18, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04