Epidural Anesthesia With Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine
Low Epidural Anesthesia With Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded Multi-centre Clinical Trial in China
1 other identifier
interventional
120
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Chinese made chloroprocaine has a rapid onset time, effective methodology, can last for a short time, provides fast motor recovery and causes no significant side effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 11, 2014
CompletedNovember 11, 2014
November 1, 2014
3 months
November 4, 2014
November 10, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Epidural anesthesia effects of chloroprocaine versus lidocaine
The effects of epidural anesthesia are assessed by onset time of epidural block, pain free and recovery time, the upper block level and time, the degree of muscle relaxation, and motor recovery time.
Four months (January - April, 2008)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of vital signs between chloroprocaine and lidocaine groups
Four months (January - April, 2008)
Study Arms (2)
Chloroprocaine Group
EXPERIMENTALEpidural anesthesia with 3% chloroprocaine.
Lidocaine Group
ACTIVE COMPARATOREpidural anesthesia with 2% lidocaine.
Interventions
60 patients undergoing lower limb or lower abdominal surgery from three hospitals in China received 3% chloroprocaine.
60 patients undergoing lower limb or lower abdominal surgery from three hospitals in China received 2% lidocaine.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Weight no more than 80 Kg or not more than 20% of normal weight
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II
- No obstacles in thinking or language communication
- No epidural puncture contraindications such as disturbances of blood coagulation, local infection of the puncture site or use of anticoagulants
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases
- Serious heart, liver, renal and metabolic diseases
- Cerebral thrombosis and sequela
- Serious dehydration and electrolyte imbalance
- Neuromuscular diseases
- Pregnant or parturient women
- Abnormal liver and kidney function
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (10)
FOLDES FF, McNALL PG. 2-Chloroprocaine: a new local anesthetic agent. Anesthesiology. 1952 May;13(3):287-96. doi: 10.1097/00000542-195205000-00009. No abstract available.
PMID: 14933832BACKGROUNDSteinemann TL, Sheikholeslami RR, Klein EF, Prokopius MJ. Short-acting peribulbar anesthesia with 2-chloroprocaine. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Jan;28(1):195-6. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00899-9.
PMID: 11777732BACKGROUNDHadzic A, Arliss J, Kerimoglu B, Karaca PE, Yufa M, Claudio RE, Vloka JD, Rosenquist R, Santos AC, Thys DM. A comparison of infraclavicular nerve block versus general anesthesia for hand and wrist day-case surgeries. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):127-32. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00020.
PMID: 15220781BACKGROUNDLiu SS, Ware PD, Rajendran S. Effects of concentration and volume of 2-chloroprocaine on epidural anesthesia in volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997 Jun;86(6):1288-93; discussion 7A. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199706000-00009.
PMID: 9197297BACKGROUNDSell A, Tein T, Pitkanen M. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: effective dose for ambulatory surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 May;52(5):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01639.x.
PMID: 18419724BACKGROUNDMarica LS, O'Day T, Janosky JE, Nystrom EU. Chloroprocaine is less painful than lidocaine for skin infiltration anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2002 Feb;94(2):351-4, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200202000-00022.
PMID: 11812697RESULTMarsch SC, Sluga M, Studer W, Barandun J, Scharplatz D, Ummenhofer W. 0.5% versus 1.0% 2-chloroprocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jun;98(6):1789-1793. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000116929.45557.CE.
PMID: 15155349RESULTJafari S, Kalstein AI, Nasrullah HM, Hedayatnia M, Yarmush JM, SchianodiCola J. A randomized, prospective, double-blind trial comparing 3% chloroprocaine followed by 0.5% bupivacaine to 2% lidocaine followed by 0.5% bupivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1746-50. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318185cd5e.
PMID: 18931242RESULTBjornestad E, Iversen OL, Raeder J. Similar onset time of 2-chloroprocaine and lidocaine + epinephrine for epidural anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Mar;50(3):358-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00937.x.
PMID: 16480471RESULTCasati A, Fanelli G, Danelli G, Berti M, Ghisi D, Brivio M, Putzu M, Barbagallo A. Spinal anesthesia with lidocaine or preservative-free 2-chlorprocaine for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison. Anesth Analg. 2007 Apr;104(4):959-64. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000258766.73612.d8.
PMID: 17377114RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Weiyan Li, M.D.
School of Medicine, Nanjing University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Attending Doctor of Department of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2014
First Posted
November 11, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2008
Study Completion
June 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 11, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11