Skin Traction Versus Position Splint in Patients With Hip Fracture
The Effects of Preoperative Skin Traction and Position Splint on Pain, Comfort and Satisfaction in Patients With Hip Fracture
1 other identifier
interventional
68
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of preoperative skin traction and position splint on pain, comfort, complications, difficulty level of nursing interventions, satisfaction from treatment and nursing care in patients with hip fracture. The sample is comprised of 34 patients with hip fracture in each group, totally 68 patients. Skin traction and position splint were applied after block randomization. Data regarding pain, comfort, satisfaction from care, immobilization comfort, complications, time of operation and hospitalization time were collected after intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 10, 2014
CompletedNovember 10, 2014
November 1, 2014
1.1 years
November 3, 2014
November 6, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain
Pain was assessed by VAS score prior to intervention, 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after intervention and daily from the next morning of intervention till the surgery.
up to 7 days
Comfort
Comfort was assessed by VAS score prior to intervention, 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after intervention and by Immobilization Comfort Questionnaire daily from the next morning of intervention till the surgery.
up to 7 days
Satisfaction from the treatment
Satisfaction from the treatment was assessed by VAS score from the next day after intervention till the surgery.
Up to 7 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Complications
Up to 7 days
Surgery duration
participants were followed for the duration of surgical procedure, an average of 2 hours
Hospitalization duration
participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Skin traction
ACTIVE COMPARATORPrior to hip fracture surgery, affected limb was wrapped with a special elastic bandage and pulled from the sole of the foot with a weight of 5-10% of total body weight of the patient (min 2.3 kg, max 4.5 kg).
Position splint
EXPERIMENTALPrior to hip fracture surgery, position splint was applied to the affected limb in order to keep the extremity in the proper positon without any weight lifting.
Interventions
This group is the routine treatment (control) valid in the clinical practice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being inpatient who were planned the surgery due to the hip fracture (caput femur fracture, collum femur fracture, femur intertrochanteric fracture and subtrochanteric fracture) diagnosis in the Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic
- Being 50 years old or more
- Patients who speak and literate in Turkish
- Patients who gave informed consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Any condition that emerges an obstacle for verbal and written interaction during data collection phase
- Unable to perform written or verbal communication in Turkish
- Withdrawal from the study due to medical reasons or death, at his/her will prior to preoperative data collection
- Urgent non-elective surgery
- Physician decision that do accept the method of immobilization assigned to the patient as appropriate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gulhane Military Medical Academy
Ankara, 06018, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (11)
Resch S, Bjarnetoft B, Thorngren KG. Preoperative skin traction or pillow nursing in hip fractures: a prospective, randomized study in 123 patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Sep 30-Oct 15;27(18-19):1191-5. doi: 10.1080/09638280500055800.
PMID: 16278188BACKGROUNDSaygi B, Ozkan K, Eceviz E, Tetik C, Sen C. Skin traction and placebo effect in the preoperative pain control of patients with collum and intertrochanteric femur fractures. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2010;68(1):15-7.
PMID: 20345356BACKGROUNDEndo J, Yamaguchi S, Saito M, Itabashi T, Kita K, Koizumi W, Kawaguchi Y, Asaka T, Saegusa O. Efficacy of preoperative skin traction for hip fractures: a single-institution prospective randomized controlled trial of skin traction versus no traction. J Orthop Sci. 2013 Mar;18(2):250-5. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0338-1. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
PMID: 23187429BACKGROUNDRosen JE, Chen FS, Hiebert R, Koval KJ. Efficacy of preoperative skin traction in hip fracture patients: a prospective, randomized study. J Orthop Trauma. 2001 Feb;15(2):81-5. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200102000-00001.
PMID: 11232658BACKGROUNDKoval KJ, Cooley MR. Clinical pathway after hip fracture. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Sep 30-Oct 15;27(18-19):1053-60. doi: 10.1080/09638280500056618.
PMID: 16278174BACKGROUNDHili S, Dawe EJ, Lindisfarne EA, Stott PM. Perioperative management of elderly patients suffering a hip fracture. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2014 Feb;75(2):78-82. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2014.75.2.78.
PMID: 24521802BACKGROUNDYip DK, Chan CF, Chiu PK, Wong JW, Kong JK. Why are we still using pre-operative skin traction for hip fractures? Int Orthop. 2002;26(6):361-4. doi: 10.1007/s00264-002-0387-8. Epub 2002 Jul 13.
PMID: 12466869BACKGROUNDAnderson GH, Harper WM, Connolly CD, Badham J, Goodrich N, Gregg PJ. Preoperative skin traction for fractures of the proximal femur. A randomised prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Sep;75(5):794-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376442.
PMID: 8376442BACKGROUNDHandoll HH, Queally JM, Parker MJ. Pre-operative traction for hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;(12):CD000168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000168.pub3.
PMID: 22161361BACKGROUNDLevi N. Is preoperative tibial traction responsible for peroneal nerve palsy in patients with a fractured hip? Acta Orthop Belg. 1998 Sep;64(3):273-6.
PMID: 9828472BACKGROUNDFinsen V, Borset M, Buvik GE, Hauke I. Preoperative traction in patients with hip fractures. Injury. 1992;23(4):242-4. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(05)80007-5.
PMID: 1618564BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Betul Tosun, RN, PhD
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi
- STUDY CHAIR
Ozlem Aslan, Assoc.Prof.
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- RN, MsN, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2014
First Posted
November 10, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 10, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11