Paired Associative Stimulation in Post-stroke Hand Motor Deficits
PAS-stroke
Assessment of Paired Associative Stimulation Protocols Using Cerebellar or Visual Afferences in Post-stroke Hand Motor Deficits
2 other identifiers
observational
81
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction The motor impairment of the upper extremity is the most common sequelae after ischemic stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non- invasive technique in the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, its effect in post-stroke motor deficits remains moderate our days. To potentiate the effect of TMS, techniques called Paired Associative Stimulations (PAS) involving the integration of afferent sensory inputs at the level of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex were developed in healthy subjects. PAS techniques have shown a gain of corticospinal excitability by such phenomenon known as long Term Potentiation (LTP) and a gain of motor performance. The investigators would like to propose to evaluate two types of these techniques with a volley of visual afferents (visuomotor stimulation, V\_PAS) or of cerebellar afferents (CER\_PAS), because these two structures convey important information in the execution of the movement. Design Multicenter, randomized, study, 60 patients in 3 parallel groups (V\_PAS, CER\_PAS, control group with sham and sham V\_PAS CER\_PAS), 5 days of treatment, clinical assessment, electrophysiological and MRI before, immediately post- and second post-assessments (4 weeks). A group of 24 healthy subjects will undergo a parallel physiopathological study on the underlying mechanisms of cerebellar PAS Objectives Main objective: To determine whether (and how) Paired Associative Stimulation technique (PAS) induces cerebral reorganization in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group. Aim 2: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in motor performance of the upper limb paresis and duration Aim 3: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in excitability of the corticospinal tract and duration Aim 4: Determine how PAS techniques modify the functional connectivity during movement Aim 5: Determine if connectivity changes during induced movement correlate with clinical improvements Aim 6: Determine whether patients who benefit of a type of PAS have specific anatomical lesion characteristics (volume, afferent and efferent white matter fasciculi integrity)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2015
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 5, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 26, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 7, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 7, 2018
CompletedDecember 10, 2025
March 1, 2025
3.8 years
October 21, 2014
December 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change in lateralization indices in the primary motor cortex using functional magnetic Resonance
Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
change in motor score of the affected hand by the Jebsen Taylor Test
Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)
change in corticospinal excitability by the motor evoked potentials
Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)
Study Arms (4)
V_PAS
Visuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol
Sham V_PAS
Placebo group of Visuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol
CER_PAS
cerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol
Sham CER_PAS
Placebo group of cerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Stroke patients
You may qualify if:
- First event ischemic stroke with hand motor deficit
- Time since stroke \> 30 days
- Stroke lesion sparing the primary motor cortex (hand knob area)
- Age between 18 and 85 ans
You may not qualify if:
- No homonymous hemianopia
- No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
- Pregnancy
- Epilepsia
- Any pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up
- Age between 18 and 85
- Right handed
- No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
- Pregnancy
- Any cerebral pathology or pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ICM, CIC Neurosciences
Paris, 75013, France
Related Publications (4)
Rosso C, Moulton EJ, Kemlin C, Leder S, Corvol JC, Mehdi S, Obadia MA, Obadia M, Yger M, Meseguer E, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Magno S, Lindberg P, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Cerebello-Motor Paired Associative Stimulation and Motor Recovery in Stroke: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Trial. Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Mar;19(2):491-500. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01205-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
PMID: 35226342RESULTKemlin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Houot M, Meunier S, Rosso C, Lamy JC. Redundancy Among Parameters Describing the Input-Output Relation of Motor Evoked Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients. Front Neurol. 2019 May 21;10:535. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00535. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31178817RESULTRosso C, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Obadia M, Kemlin-Mechin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Anatomical and functional correlates of cortical motor threshold of the dominant hand. Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):952-958. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 17.
PMID: 28551318RESULTRosso C, Lamy JC. Does Resting Motor Threshold Predict Motor Hand Recovery After Stroke? Front Neurol. 2018 Nov 29;9:1020. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01020. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30555404RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charlotte ROSSO, PI
Brain and Spine institute, INSERM UMR 1127, CNRS 7225
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2014
First Posted
November 5, 2014
Study Start
January 26, 2015
Primary Completion
November 7, 2018
Study Completion
November 7, 2018
Last Updated
December 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03