NCT02284087

Brief Summary

Introduction The motor impairment of the upper extremity is the most common sequelae after ischemic stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non- invasive technique in the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, its effect in post-stroke motor deficits remains moderate our days. To potentiate the effect of TMS, techniques called Paired Associative Stimulations (PAS) involving the integration of afferent sensory inputs at the level of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex were developed in healthy subjects. PAS techniques have shown a gain of corticospinal excitability by such phenomenon known as long Term Potentiation (LTP) and a gain of motor performance. The investigators would like to propose to evaluate two types of these techniques with a volley of visual afferents (visuomotor stimulation, V\_PAS) or of cerebellar afferents (CER\_PAS), because these two structures convey important information in the execution of the movement. Design Multicenter, randomized, study, 60 patients in 3 parallel groups (V\_PAS, CER\_PAS, control group with sham and sham V\_PAS CER\_PAS), 5 days of treatment, clinical assessment, electrophysiological and MRI before, immediately post- and second post-assessments (4 weeks). A group of 24 healthy subjects will undergo a parallel physiopathological study on the underlying mechanisms of cerebellar PAS Objectives Main objective: To determine whether (and how) Paired Associative Stimulation technique (PAS) induces cerebral reorganization in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group. Aim 2: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in motor performance of the upper limb paresis and duration Aim 3: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in excitability of the corticospinal tract and duration Aim 4: Determine how PAS techniques modify the functional connectivity during movement Aim 5: Determine if connectivity changes during induced movement correlate with clinical improvements Aim 6: Determine whether patients who benefit of a type of PAS have specific anatomical lesion characteristics (volume, afferent and efferent white matter fasciculi integrity)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
81

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 21, 2014

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 5, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 26, 2015

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 7, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 7, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 10, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

October 21, 2014

Last Update Submit

December 3, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

transcranial magnetic stimulationmovement disorders

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • change in lateralization indices in the primary motor cortex using functional magnetic Resonance

    Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • change in motor score of the affected hand by the Jebsen Taylor Test

    Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)

  • change in corticospinal excitability by the motor evoked potentials

    Change from Baseline to day 5 (Pre and post intervention)

Study Arms (4)

V_PAS

Visuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol

Device: PAS

Sham V_PAS

Placebo group of Visuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol

CER_PAS

cerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol

Device: PAS

Sham CER_PAS

Placebo group of cerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol

Interventions

PASDEVICE
CER_PASV_PAS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Stroke patients

You may qualify if:

  • First event ischemic stroke with hand motor deficit
  • Time since stroke \> 30 days
  • Stroke lesion sparing the primary motor cortex (hand knob area)
  • Age between 18 and 85 ans

You may not qualify if:

  • No homonymous hemianopia
  • No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
  • Pregnancy
  • Epilepsia
  • Any pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up
  • Age between 18 and 85
  • Right handed
  • No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
  • Pregnancy
  • Any cerebral pathology or pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

ICM, CIC Neurosciences

Paris, 75013, France

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Rosso C, Moulton EJ, Kemlin C, Leder S, Corvol JC, Mehdi S, Obadia MA, Obadia M, Yger M, Meseguer E, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Magno S, Lindberg P, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Cerebello-Motor Paired Associative Stimulation and Motor Recovery in Stroke: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Trial. Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Mar;19(2):491-500. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01205-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

  • Kemlin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Houot M, Meunier S, Rosso C, Lamy JC. Redundancy Among Parameters Describing the Input-Output Relation of Motor Evoked Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients. Front Neurol. 2019 May 21;10:535. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00535. eCollection 2019.

  • Rosso C, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Obadia M, Kemlin-Mechin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Anatomical and functional correlates of cortical motor threshold of the dominant hand. Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):952-958. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 17.

  • Rosso C, Lamy JC. Does Resting Motor Threshold Predict Motor Hand Recovery After Stroke? Front Neurol. 2018 Nov 29;9:1020. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01020. eCollection 2018.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeMovement Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Charlotte ROSSO, PI

    Brain and Spine institute, INSERM UMR 1127, CNRS 7225

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2014

First Posted

November 5, 2014

Study Start

January 26, 2015

Primary Completion

November 7, 2018

Study Completion

November 7, 2018

Last Updated

December 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations