A Real-World Registry of Chronic Wounds and Ulcers
WOUNDJOURNEY
A Longitudinal, Real World, Observational Registry of Chronic Wounds and Ulcers and the Patients Who Have Them
1 other identifier
observational
300,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
WOUNDJOURNEY is a longitudinal, real-world, observational registry designed to capture the full clinical course and patient journey associated with chronic wounds and ulcers. Data are collected during routine care from over 1,400 clinicians across the USA and Puerto Rico using a highly structured certified electronic health record (EHR) or electronic data capture (EDC) system. Data are transmitted daily to the U.S. Wound Registry (USWR), a CMS-recognized Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR). The registry captures real-time, research-ready data on patient demographics, comorbidities, wound characteristics, standard-of-care treatments, complications, and advanced therapeutics. It supports robust, fit-for-purpose real-world evidence generation by enabling risk-adjusted outcome analysis, comparative effectiveness research, and quality improvement across diverse sites of care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2005
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 29, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 31, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2030
July 16, 2025
July 1, 2025
25 years
October 29, 2014
July 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Healed
Wound closure by secondary intention
1 year
Major amputation
Below the knee, above the knee
1 year
Minor amputation
toe amputation, transmetatarsal amputation, midfoot amputation
1 year
Patient Death
patient death while in treatment
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percent surface area (PAR) reduction over time
variable - measured at multiple intervals (e.g., 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52 weeks)
Study Arms (1)
chronic wound patients
This cohort includes pediatric and adult patients with one or more chronic wounds or ulcers treated in any site of care including hospital outpatient clinics, office-based practices, skilled nursing, and home. Data are captured prospectively during routine care using a purpose built certified EHR. Wounds include diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, pressure ulcers/injuries, arterial ulcers, surgical wounds, traumatic wounds, and inflammatory ulcers. Interventions are at the discretion of the treating clinician and include standard and advanced wound therapies. Data collected include patient demographics, comorbid conditions, medications, total number of concomitant wounds per patient, wound characteristics, treatments, visit frequency, complications, and outcomes including healing, amputation, recurrence, hospitalization, and death. Patients may be followed for over five years.
Interventions
advanced dressings, off-loading, venous ulcer compression, arterial screening
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with chronic wounds or ulcers treated at participating sites in any US State and Puerto Rico. All patients and wounds are included without sampling. Each wound can be analyzed independently, even when multiple wounds exist on a single patient. Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample Minimum Age: 0 Years Maximum Age: None (patients aged 90+ are reported in aggregate per HIPAA) Sex: All Gender Based: No Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
You may qualify if:
- Presence of one or more chronic wounds or ulcers of any etiology
- Wound or ulcer must be treated at a participating site (which can be a hospital outpatient department, office, mobile practitioner, in the home setting, skilled nursing, etc.)
- Care must be documented using the purpose-built, wound-specific structured electronic health record (EHR) or electronic data capture (EDC) system
- All ages, including infants and patients aged 90 years or older (reported in aggregate in accordance with HIPAA de-identification standards)
- All sexes and gender identities
- All wound types and severities, including multiple wounds per patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
US Wound Registry
The Woodlands, Texas, 77386, United States
Related Publications (6)
Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B, Otto G. The safety of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure in diabetic foot ulcers treated in the outpatient setting. Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):17-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00467.x.
PMID: 18577134BACKGROUNDFife CE, Walker D, Thomson B. Electronic Health Records, Registries, and Quality Measures: What? Why? How? Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2013 Dec;2(10):598-604. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0476.
PMID: 24761335BACKGROUNDHorn SD, Fife CE, Smout RJ, Barrett RS, Thomson B. Development of a wound healing index for patients with chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2013 Nov-Dec;21(6):823-32. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12107. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
PMID: 24134202BACKGROUNDCarter MJ, Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B. Estimating the applicability of wound care randomized controlled trials to general wound-care populations by estimating the percentage of individuals excluded from a typical wound-care population in such trials. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 Jul;22(7):316-24. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305486.06358.e0.
PMID: 20375969BACKGROUNDFife CE, Carter MJ, Walker D, Thomson B. A retrospective data analysis of antimicrobial dressing usage in 3,084 patients. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010 Mar 1;56(3):28-42.
PMID: 20368672BACKGROUNDFife CE, Carter MJ, Walker D. Why is it so hard to do the right thing in wound care? Wound Repair Regen. 2010 Mar-Apr;18(2):154-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00571.x. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
PMID: 20163568BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Caroline E Fife, MD
Intellicure LLC
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 5 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2014
First Posted
October 31, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2030
Last Updated
July 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Available upon request after data quality review and registry updates are complete. IPD is available on an ongoing basis, with no fixed end date.
- Access Criteria
- Access to de-identified individual participant data (IPD) may be granted to qualified researchers, payers, regulatory agencies, or industry partners upon request. Requests must include a research protocol or data use justification. Data access is contingent on execution of a data use agreement (DUA) and, where applicable, institutional review board (IRB) approval. All shared data will comply with HIPAA de-identification standards (45 CFR §164.514). The U.S. Wound Registry reserves the right to review all requests for scientific merit, relevance, and feasibility. Contact the registry to initiate a data access request. For access inquiries, contact: cfife@intellicure.com
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) collected through the U.S. Wound Registry (USWR) may be made available to qualified researchers, payers, regulatory agencies, or industry partners upon request. Shared data may include demographics, comorbidities, wound characteristics, interventions, and outcomes captured longitudinally in a structured electronic health record (EHR) or data capture system. All shared data comply with HIPAA de-identification standards and may be subject to data use agreements and institutional review board (IRB) approval.