A Study Comparing the Bioequivalence of Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray (Apotex, Inc.) to That of Dymista™ Nasal Spray (Meda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled,Parallel-group Study Comparing the Bioequivalence of Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray (Apotex, Inc.) to That of Dymista™ Nasal Spray (Meda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. )in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
1 other identifier
interventional
595
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study is to evaluate the equivalence of generic Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray with that of the marketed drug, Dymista™ Nasal Spray, in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of generic Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate nasal spray compared with Dymista™ nasal spray.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 28, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 31, 2014
CompletedOctober 31, 2014
October 1, 2014
2 months
October 28, 2014
October 30, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (Change from baseline in the combined reflective TNSS (combined AM and PM reflective scores of runny nose, nasal congestion, nasal itchiness, and sneezing)
Change from baseline in the combined AM and PM instantaneous scores of runny nose, nasal congestion, nasal itchiness, and sneezing.
2 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (Change from baseline in the combined AM and PM instantaneous scores of runny nose, nasal congestion, nasal itchiness, and sneezing.)
2 months
Study Arms (3)
Azelastine HCl and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
EXPERIMENTALThe investigational product was administered via nasal inhalation with one spray in each nostril twice daily. Batch Number KL1981, Expiry Date Mar 2015.
Dymista™ Nasal Spray
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe reference product was administered via nasal inhalation with one spray in each nostril twice daily. Batch Number G30349, Expiry Date Mar 2015.
Placebo Nasal Spray
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe placebo was administered via nasal inhalation with one spray in each nostril twice daily. Batch Number KL0781, Expiry Date Mar 2015.
Interventions
During the placebo lead-in period, the placebo nasal spray was administered via nasal inhalation with one spray in each nostril twice daily for 7days. During the randomized treatment period, the investigational products (experimental, active comparator and placebo nasal spray) were administered via nasal inhalation with one spray in each nostril twice daily for 14 days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who provided written informed consent.
- Subjects who were able to read and understand English.
- Males or females, 18 to 65 years old, inclusive.
- If the subject was a female of childbearing potential, she was not pregnant (confirmed by negative urine pregnancy test) or lactating. Females of childbearing potential agreed to use reliable birth control measures throughout the study, defined as abstinence or use of an effective method of birth control (double barrier \[female subject's partner using condom and female subject using diaphragm, contraceptive sponge, spermicide, or intrauterine device\], or the use of a hormonal contraceptive \[oral, patch, or inserted under the skin or injected into the muscle\]). Female subjects who used oral contraceptives or levonorgestrel implants were required to have started the method at least 90 days prior to the screening visit. A female of childbearing potential was defined as a female who had experienced menarche, and who had not undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or ovariectomy, bilateral tubal ligation or salpingectomy) or was not post-menopausal for at least 1 year.
- At least a 2-year reliable medical history consistent with SAR, defined as symptoms present during the previous two grass and/or pollen seasons.
- Positive skin test within 12 months of screening to at least one currently present seasonal allergen in the geographical area that had a predictable allergen season (eg, birch pollen, ragweed, Mountain Cedar, etc) with a minimum skin test response of 3 mm or greater than a negative control, and a positive test to histamine, also defined as a response of 3 mm or greater than the negative control.
- Was capable of tolerating intranasal application of the study drug.
- No clinically significant results from the screening physical examination, nasal examination, and medical history.
- Was willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol and was available for the full duration of the study, with no planned travel outside of the pollen area for a substantial portion (\>48 hours) of the study period.
- Was, in the Investigator's judgment (through exposure to allergen), expected to require treatment throughout the entire study period.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who met any of the following criteria were excluded from the study:
- Signs or symptoms of nasal polyps, deviated septum, or any other condition (including nasal piercing within the previous 3 months) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may have resulted in erroneous study data.
- Underwent nasal surgery or had nasal trauma within 3 months of Visit 1 (screening).
- Had active respiratory conditions that included, but were not limited to, acute or exacerbated chronic sinusitis, an abnormal sinus radiograph, an upper or lower respiratory tract infection, or rhinitis medicamentosa.
- Had PAR that required or was expected to require active PAR treatment during the study period.
- Had a respiratory tract infection (including otitis media and streptococcus) that required antibiotic treatment within 2 weeks of Visit 1 (screening).
- Used any of the prohibited medications prior to the start of the single-blind, placebo lead-in visit (Visit 2) within the time period specified in the protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Apotex Inc.lead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 28, 2014
First Posted
October 31, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 31, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10