Comparison of the Skin Conductance Values and Patient Pain Scores During Minor Procedures in the ICU
1 other identifier
observational
30
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
Pain in hospitalized patients has received increasing attention, however due to its subjective nature, it has defied objective, quantitative measurements. If a patient is able to communicate, pain may be assessed using standardized sentences, visual analog scales (VAS) or plain numeric scales. When a patient is unable to communicate, a method that would allow the caregiver to continuously monitor patients' pain and alert the provider that the patient may be in pain would be quite useful. The Pain Monitor uses a novel measurement technique of analyzing changes in skin conductance that can be used in patients who are unable to provide a subjective pain score. This study will compare the relationship between the measurements taken by the PainMonitor and pain scores given by communicative patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this monitor during planned, routine procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Oct 2014
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 24, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 15, 2017
September 1, 2017
2.7 years
October 24, 2014
September 14, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensitivity and specificity with a confidence interval
Sensitivity and specificity with a confidence interval \> 80 % when skin conductance responses per sec are \> 0.13 and VAS is equal to or greater than 30 mm. This end point will be reached by 100 patients with at least 10 discrete measurements for each patient.
1 year
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients between the ages of 18-89 years (inclusive), that are scheduled to receive a painful procedure. We are requesting a total population of 120 to allow for withdrawals
You may qualify if:
- Patients between the ages of 18-89 years (inclusive), in an adult ICU
- Patients admitted to the ICU who are able to communicate their pain and anxiety using a VAS
- Patients must be cooperative and not agitated.
- Planned to have a potentially painful procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed neuropathic disease
- Use of neostigmine within the past 3 hours
- Use of regional anesthesia at the extremity where the device electrodes are placed
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Centerlead
- Med-Storm Innovationcollaborator
- Hopital Fochcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Hopital Foch
Suresnes, 92150, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 24, 2014
First Posted
October 28, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share