NCT02276690

Brief Summary

Anaemia is very frequent among critically ill patients, concerning more than 60 % of them at admission and more than 80% at intensive care unit discharge. Iron deficiency is also frequent at admission, with prevalence around 25 to 40%. During their stay in Intensive Care Unit, critically ill patients are exposed to repeated blood samples and to other blood losses (daily blood loss has been evaluated to be as high as 128 ml/day in median), this leads to direct iron loss. Prevalence of iron deficiency may thus be very important at Intensive Care Unit discharge. However, iron deficiency diagnosis is complicated in these patients, since inflammation induces an increase in plasma ferritin levels and a decrease in transferrin saturation, the two usual markers of iron deficiency. As a consequence, iron deficiency is usely under-diagnosed in these patients. Treatment of iron deficiency may be indicated to correct anaemia but also to improve patients fatigue and muscular weakness. The characterization of iron metabolism regulation by the hormone hepcidin opened new ways for the understanding and the follow-up of these complex clinical situations (combining inflammation and iron deficiency). Indeed, iron deficiency is associated with a decrease in hepcidin synthesis, while iron overload induces hepcidin synthesis. Furthermore, low hepcidin levels are required to mobilize iron from stores. Hepcidin has thus be proposed as a marker of iron deficiency in critically ill patients. To date, standard immunological methods of hepcidin quantitation are only proposed in the reasearch setting and could not be proposed in the clinical setting because it is too expensive. New approaches for hepcidin quantification, based on mass spectrometry are proposed and may be routinely implemented. We make the hypothesis that treating iron deficiency in critically ill anemic patients, diagnosed by hepcidin quantification, may improve the post-Intensive Care Unit rehabilitation, and may thus reduce post-Intensive Care Unit cost linked to hospital stay and anaemia treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the medical economic interest of a new diagnostic method for iron deficiency, based on a quantitative dosage of hepcidin by mass spectrometry in critically ill anaemic patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
408

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 16, 2014

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 28, 2014

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 26, 2016

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 6, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

October 16, 2014

Last Update Submit

October 5, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

iron deficiencydosage of hepcidinusual biomarker (ferritin and transferrin saturation)mass spectrometryimmuno-detectionanaemia in intensive care unit

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Hospital cost

    from Intensive Care Unit discharge to 90 days after (D90)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Lenght of hospital stay post-Intensive Care Unit

    until day 90 after Intensive Care Unit discharge

  • Haemoglobin levels

    15 days post-Intensive Care Unit discharge

  • Iron deficiency prevalence

    at Day 15 after Intensive Care Unit discharge

  • Fatigue

    30 days after Intensive Care Unit discharge

  • Proportion of patient alive

    at Day 90 after Intensive Care Unit discharge

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Dosage of hepcidin

EXPERIMENTAL

In order to assess iron deficiency, patients randomized in this arm will have dosage of hepcidin by mass spectrometry

Biological: hepcidin

Usual biomarker dosage

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In order to assess iron deficiency, patients randomized in this arm will have usual biomarker dosages (ferritin and transferrin saturation)

Biological: ferritin and transferrin saturation

Interventions

hepcidinBIOLOGICAL

In order to assess iron deficiency by innovative method (dosage of Hepcidin), an additional collection of blood will be done at day 0 (and weekly until Intensive Care Unit discharge) and at Day 15 after Intensive Care Unit discharge. Treatement of Iron deficiency anaemia and anaemia of chronic disease using intravenous iron (± erythropoietin) will be encouraged (or not) according to hepcidin levels

Dosage of hepcidin

In order to assess iron deficiency by using usual biomarkers (ferritin and transferrin saturation), collection of blood will be done at day 0 (and weekly until Intensive Care Unit discharge) and at Day 15 after Intensive Care Unit discharge. Treatement of Iron deficiency anaemia and anaemia of chronic disease using intravenous iron (± erythropoietin) will be encouraged (or not) according to ferritin levels.

Usual biomarker dosage

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Hospitalized man/woman in reanimation unit for at least 5 days.
  • Age ≥ 18 years old.
  • Patient having an anaemia such as defined by the WHO (World Health Organization) (for man: Hemoglobin \< 13 g/dl, for woman: Hemoglobin \< 12 g/dl).
  • Signed inform consent by the patient or a close person.
  • Subject affiliated to a national health insurance

You may not qualify if:

  • Known iron metabolism pathology (such as primitive or secondary hemochromatosis, …).
  • Chronic anaemia (Hemoglobin ≤ 10 g/dl for more than 3 months).
  • Current chemotherapy.
  • Patient having an organ transplant
  • Expected survival \< 28 days post Intensive Care Unit discharge.
  • Pregnancy
  • Patient deprived of freedom, by judicial or administrative order.
  • Major protected by the law.
  • Contra-indication to the injectable iron treatment (allergy to ferric carboxymaltose, infection derivates (bacteriamy \< 48 hours) untreated).
  • Non speaking French patient, or patient unable to answer a questionnaire because of any neurologic disorder (stroke, brain trauma….).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Angers University Hospital, 4 rue larrey

Angers, 49000, France

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Lasocki S, Puy H, Mercier G, Lehmann S; Hepcidane study group. Impact of iron deficiency diagnosis using hepcidin mass spectrometry dosage methods on hospital stay and costs after a prolonged ICU stay: Study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, single-blinded medico-economic trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017 Dec;36(6):391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

    PMID: 28919067BACKGROUND
  • Lasocki S, Asfar P, Jaber S, Ferrandiere M, Kerforne T, Asehnoune K, Montravers P, Seguin P, Peoc'h K, Gergaud S, Nagot N, Lefebvre T, Lehmann S; Hepcidane study group. Impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged ICU stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial. Crit Care. 2021 Feb 15;25(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03430-3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AnemiaCritical IllnessIron Deficiencies

Interventions

HepcidinsFerritins

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsIron Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Iron-Regulatory ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsMembrane ProteinsIron-Binding ProteinsCarrier ProteinsMetalloproteins

Study Officials

  • Sigismond SL LASOCKI, PU-PH

    Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Angers University Hospital, France

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Sylvain SL LEHMANN, PU-PH

    Biochemistry and clinical proteomic laboratory, IRMB, St Eloi University Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2014

First Posted

October 28, 2014

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion

October 26, 2016

Study Completion

September 1, 2017

Last Updated

October 6, 2017

Record last verified: 2015-11

Locations