The Influence of Leg Length Discrepancy After Total Hip Arthroplasty on Function and Quality of Life
BioHipLLD
1 other identifier
observational
174
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a complication of THA and may result in patient dissatisfaction, gait disorder, greater trochanter pain, low back pain. In the literature, LLD is reported to vary widely among studies e.g. 6 to 35 mm. However, the threshold at which a LLD is clinically important is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of non-corrected LLD after THA on patients' reported hip function and quality of life. This prospective cohort study was conducted at Sundsvall Teaching Hospital in Sweden after it was approved by the regional ethics committee at Umeå University (No. 07-052M and No. 12-287-32M). Between September 2010 and April 2013, all patients with unilateral primary osteoarthritis (OA) treated with THA were considered for inclusion. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients with secondary OA, previous spinal, pelvic, or lower limb injuries or fractures were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index that measures functional outcome (ref). The secondary outcome measure was the EQ-5D and visual analogue scale (VAS) scale. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at follow-up at 1 year postoperatively. The posterolateral approach was used in all operations. LLD was measured on the postoperative x-rays. patients were divided into three groups: shortening group where the operated leg was more than 5mm shorter compared with the contralateral side, the restoration control group where the operated leg was within 5mm shortening and 9mm lengthening compared with the contralateral side, and the lengthening group where the operated leg became more than 9mm longer compared with the contralateral side.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2010
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2014
CompletedOctober 29, 2015
October 1, 2015
2.6 years
October 23, 2014
October 28, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
WOMAC
12-15 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
EQ-5D
12-15 months
Visual analogue scale
12-15 months
Study Arms (3)
shortening group
Shortening group where the operated leg was more than 5mm shorter compared with the contralateral side
Restoration group
the restoration control group where the operated leg was within 5mm shortening and 9mm lengthening compared with the contralateral side
Lengthening group
The lengthening group where the operated leg became more than 9mm longer compared with the contralateral side.
Interventions
Cemented or uncemented total hip arthroplasty. No other intervention than observing patients operated according to routine practise at an orthopaedic department.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients with unilateral primary osteoarthritis (OA) treated with THA at the orthopaedic department in Sundsvall, Sweden were considered for inclusion.
You may not qualify if:
- Secondary OA.
- Previous spinal, pelvic, or lower limb injuries or fractures.
- Bilateral coxarthrosis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (7)
Ogawa K, Kabata T, Maeda T, Kajino Y, Tsuchiya H. Accurate leg length measurement in total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of computer navigation and a simple manual measurement device. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Jun;6(2):153-8. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.153. Epub 2014 May 16.
PMID: 24900895BACKGROUNDWhitehouse MR, Stefanovich-Lawbuary NS, Brunton LR, Blom AW. The impact of leg length discrepancy on patient satisfaction and functional outcome following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8):1408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
PMID: 23507069BACKGROUNDMcWilliams AB, Grainger AJ, O'Connor PJ, Redmond AC, Stewart TD, Stone MH. A review of symptomatic leg length inequality following total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2013 Jan-Feb;23(1):6-14. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2013.10631.
PMID: 23397200BACKGROUNDBertz A, Indrekvam K, Ahmed M, Englund E, Sayed-Noor AS. Validity and reliability of preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty using a digital templating system. Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Sep;41(10):1245-9. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1431-4. Epub 2012 May 16.
PMID: 22588597BACKGROUNDPlaass C, Clauss M, Ochsner PE, Ilchmann T. Influence of leg length discrepancy on clinical results after total hip arthroplasty--a prospective clinical trial. Hip Int. 2011 Jul-Aug;21(4):441-9. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2011.8575.
PMID: 21818744BACKGROUNDO'Brien S, Kernohan G, Fitzpatrick C, Hill J, Beverland D. Perception of imposed leg length inequality in normal subjects. Hip Int. 2010 Oct-Dec;20(4):505-11. doi: 10.1177/112070001002000414.
PMID: 21157756BACKGROUNDMahmood SS, Mukka SS, Crnalic S, Sayed-Noor AS. The Influence of Leg Length Discrepancy after Total Hip Arthroplasty on Function and Quality of Life: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9):1638-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
PMID: 25922312RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2014
First Posted
October 27, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
April 1, 2013
Study Completion
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 29, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10