Adnexal Masses : Correlation Between MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imagery) and Anatomopathology
1 other identifier
observational
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to correlate the pelvic magnetic resonance imagery characteristics of adnexal masses with their anatomopathological characteristics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Apr 2014
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedMay 18, 2015
May 1, 2015
1 year
June 27, 2014
May 15, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
RECIST criteria
MRI imaging (standard protocol for ovarian pathology). The MRI will be realised on a 3.0T instrument (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). The patient will be placed in dorsal decubitus with an antenna placed at the pelvic level. Just before the examination, Buscopan IV will be injected. The initial protocol will consist in a localisation examination followed by a standard protocol for ovarian pathologies, meaning a SE T2WI in the three plans, an axial diffusion sequence and a pondered T1 sequence (T1 dynamic contrast imaging). The total examination time will be 20 minutes on average.
at MRI diagnosis
Percentage of epithelial and conjunctive zones in the adnexal mass obtained by surgery
The anatomopathologist will contact the surgeons when an adnexectomy is programmed. A detailed macroscopic description is realized (photographies of the external capsule) and the fragment is oriented according to 6 axes (superior, inferior, external, internal, anterior, posterior) with permanent tissues marking dyes. The piece will be sectioned in 1cm slices, a picture of each one being taken. The piece will be fixed in formol and embedded in paraffin. Slices will be made using a RM 2235 Leica Microtome and colored with hematoxylin/eosin, for examination by the anatomopathologist. The radiologist and the anatomopathologist will select, by consensus, interest zones that will be examined with an accredited microscope (ISO9001 accreditation). Several parameters such as the percentage of epithelial and conjunctive zones will be observed, described and semi-quantified. Immunomarkings will be realized if necessary, according to the criteria described in the ISO9001 accreditation files.
24h after MRI diagnosis
Study Arms (1)
Patients with adnexal masses
Every patient that are at least 18 years old with a planned pelvic magnetic resonance imagery and an adnexectomy within the institution.
Eligibility Criteria
Women with adnexal masses, with a planned pelvic magnetic resonance imagery and a planned adnexectomy within the institution, having signed the informed consent form.
You may qualify if:
- \- Every woman aged 18 years and more, with a planned pelvic magnetic resonance imagery and a planned adnexectomy within the institution.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Insufficient technical quality of the pelvic magnetic resonance imagery images or of the anatomopathological analysis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Brugmann
Brussels, 1020, Belgium
Related Publications (6)
Kurtz AB, Tsimikas JV, Tempany CM, Hamper UM, Arger PH, Bree RL, Wechsler RJ, Francis IR, Kuhlman JE, Siegelman ES, Mitchell DG, Silverman SG, Brown DL, Sheth S, Coleman BG, Ellis JH, Kurman RJ, Caudry DJ, McNeil BJ. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis--report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology. 1999 Jul;212(1):19-27. doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl3619.
PMID: 10405715BACKGROUNDGrabowska-Derlatka L, Derlatka P, Palczewski P, Danska-Bidzinska A, Pacho R. Differentiation of ovarian cancers from borderline ovarian tumors on the basis of evaluation of tumor vascularity in multi-row detector computed tomography--comparison with histopathology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Nov;23(9):1597-602. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182a80a41.
PMID: 24172096BACKGROUNDTanaka YO, Okada S, Satoh T, Matsumoto K, Saida T, Oki A, Yoshikawa H, Minami M. Solid non-invasive ovarian masses on MR: histopathology and a diagnostic approach. Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):e91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.05.032. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
PMID: 20576386BACKGROUNDAsch E, Levine D, Kim Y, Hecht JL. Histologic, surgical, and imaging correlations of adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2008 Mar;27(3):327-42. doi: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.3.327.
PMID: 18314510BACKGROUNDThomassin-Naggara I, Aubert E, Rockall A, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Rouzier R, Darai E, Bazot M. Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system. Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):432-43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121161. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
PMID: 23468574BACKGROUNDTimmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ferrazzi E, Ameye L, Konstantinovic ML, Van Calster B, Collins WP, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Valentin L; International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8794-801. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.7632.
PMID: 16314639BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Carine De Prez, Chef de service
CHU Brugmann
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Françoise HULET, MD
CHU Brugmann
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PMD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2014
First Posted
October 27, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05