Computed Tomography (CT) Coronary Angiogram Evaluation in Cancer Patients Having CT Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis
Feasibility of Computed Tomography (CT) Coronary Angiogram Evaluation in Cancer Patients Having CT Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis (CT TAP)
1 other identifier
observational
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Currently patients with certain cancer usually have routine follow up (Computed Tomography of Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis) CT TAP scans to see response to treatment or relapse. The study proposal allows the evaluation of the coronary arteries by modifying the current CT TAP technique without significant additional procedures, intravenous contrast or radiation - i.e. an opportunistic Computed Tomography Coronary Angiogram (CTCA) without any penalty. The question is does performing Computed Tomography (CT) of the thorax in such a way confer important additional information about cardiac risk? At the same time the investigators need to ensure that doing scan as per CTCA protocol produces equivalent image quality to evaluate other structures in the chest. A recent small retrospective study has using a similar technique suggests that it may in fact improve image quality due to less cardiac related motion artefact.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2015
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedMay 24, 2016
May 1, 2016
4 months
October 23, 2014
May 23, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Objective Image quality analysis
Calculating image noise as measured by standard deviation (SD) in a region of interest.
20 minutes
Objective Image quality analysis
Calculating contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)
20 minutes
Subjective Image quality analysis
All image data sets will be presented in blinded and randomized manner to two experienced consultant radiologists. Subjective image quality will be assessed in terms of subjective image noise, subjective image contrast, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence and artefacts. The image quality attributes are taken from the European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computerized Tomography document and have been proven to be robust in comparing subjective image quality.
20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Dose estimation
20 minutes
Coronary segments analysis
20minutes
Study Arms (1)
CT TAP scan
Suitable patients will be identified after consultant radiologists have approved a request for cancer routine CT TAP scan.
Interventions
Modification of chest CT protocol in the routine CT TAP: The Research CT of Thorax will be acquired as per the routinely performed CTCA with inclusion of the lung apices. Therefore the study will be acquired axially with prospective gating.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients having routine follow up cancer CT TAP scan
You may qualify if:
- Patients having routine follow up cancer CT TAP scan
- Age more than or equal to 40 years of age at the time of scan.
- Able to provide informed written consent
- Able to hold their breath for at least 10 seconds
- Has regular heart rate
- Able to follow verbal commands for breath holding and remain still for the duration of scanning
- Able to lie supine for the entirety of the scan
You may not qualify if:
- Patient unable to give informed consent.
- Patients unable to lie supine
- Patient not able to breath hold for at least 10 seconds.
- Patients not having regular heart rate. Patient with atrial fibrillation or \>2 atrial or ventricular premature beats on a preoperative 12 lead ECG (suboptimal image quality results from irregular heart rhythms)
- Patient having eGFR \<30, to avoid risk of contrast nephrotoxicity in patients potentially at risk) or chronic renal failure on dialysis
- Patient has known contrast reaction.
- Patient is pregnant.
- Patients BMI\>35
- Unavailability of research slot to accommodate for the urgency of the scan requested.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust (PHNT)
Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8DH, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Carl Roobottom, MBChB FRCP
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2014
First Posted
October 27, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 24, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05