NCT02275143

Brief Summary

Currently patients with certain cancer usually have routine follow up (Computed Tomography of Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis) CT TAP scans to see response to treatment or relapse. The study proposal allows the evaluation of the coronary arteries by modifying the current CT TAP technique without significant additional procedures, intravenous contrast or radiation - i.e. an opportunistic Computed Tomography Coronary Angiogram (CTCA) without any penalty. The question is does performing Computed Tomography (CT) of the thorax in such a way confer important additional information about cardiac risk? At the same time the investigators need to ensure that doing scan as per CTCA protocol produces equivalent image quality to evaluate other structures in the chest. A recent small retrospective study has using a similar technique suggests that it may in fact improve image quality due to less cardiac related motion artefact.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 23, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 27, 2014

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 24, 2016

Status Verified

May 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

October 23, 2014

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Computed Tomography of Thorax, Abdomen and Pelviscancer patientscoronary angiogram evaluation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Objective Image quality analysis

    Calculating image noise as measured by standard deviation (SD) in a region of interest.

    20 minutes

  • Objective Image quality analysis

    Calculating contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)

    20 minutes

  • Subjective Image quality analysis

    All image data sets will be presented in blinded and randomized manner to two experienced consultant radiologists. Subjective image quality will be assessed in terms of subjective image noise, subjective image contrast, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence and artefacts. The image quality attributes are taken from the European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computerized Tomography document and have been proven to be robust in comparing subjective image quality.

    20 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Dose estimation

    20 minutes

  • Coronary segments analysis

    20minutes

Study Arms (1)

CT TAP scan

Suitable patients will be identified after consultant radiologists have approved a request for cancer routine CT TAP scan.

Radiation: CT TAP Scan

Interventions

CT TAP ScanRADIATION

Modification of chest CT protocol in the routine CT TAP: The Research CT of Thorax will be acquired as per the routinely performed CTCA with inclusion of the lung apices. Therefore the study will be acquired axially with prospective gating.

CT TAP scan

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients having routine follow up cancer CT TAP scan

You may qualify if:

  • Patients having routine follow up cancer CT TAP scan
  • Age more than or equal to 40 years of age at the time of scan.
  • Able to provide informed written consent
  • Able to hold their breath for at least 10 seconds
  • Has regular heart rate
  • Able to follow verbal commands for breath holding and remain still for the duration of scanning
  • Able to lie supine for the entirety of the scan

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient unable to give informed consent.
  • Patients unable to lie supine
  • Patient not able to breath hold for at least 10 seconds.
  • Patients not having regular heart rate. Patient with atrial fibrillation or \>2 atrial or ventricular premature beats on a preoperative 12 lead ECG (suboptimal image quality results from irregular heart rhythms)
  • Patient having eGFR \<30, to avoid risk of contrast nephrotoxicity in patients potentially at risk) or chronic renal failure on dialysis
  • Patient has known contrast reaction.
  • Patient is pregnant.
  • Patients BMI\>35
  • Unavailability of research slot to accommodate for the urgency of the scan requested.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust (PHNT)

Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8DH, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Stenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Carl Roobottom, MBChB FRCP

    University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2014

First Posted

October 27, 2014

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion

February 1, 2016

Study Completion

February 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 24, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-05

Locations