NCT02270255

Brief Summary

Uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) is now an accepted treatment of uterine fibroids. However the procedure is often very painful and, in many centres, patients are admitted overnight with patient controlled analgesic (PCA) pumps for pain control and discharged the next day with heavy pain medications. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a superior hypogastric nerve block (SHGNB) in controlling the pain post-UFE.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 16, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 21, 2014

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2015

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2017

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 5, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 14, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

October 16, 2014

Results QC Date

March 12, 2019

Last Update Submit

August 2, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

embolizationanalgesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • mg Equivalent Morphine Used Until Discharge From Recovery Room to Control Pain Level Below 4/10 (VAS)

    mg equivalent morphine used until discharge from recovery room to maintain pain level below 4/10 (visual analog scale 0/10=no pain to 10/10=worse pain the patient could imagine)

    6 hrs (from time of end of UFE to time of discharge from recovery room)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Patients With Serious Adverse Reactions From Superior Hypogastric Nerve Block

    10 days

Study Arms (2)

Control group

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham procedure. Subcutaneous injection of 5cc of 1% Xylocaine in the periumbilical region.

Procedure: Subcutaneous injectionDrug: 1% Xylocaine

Sup Hypogastric Nerve block group

EXPERIMENTAL

Superior hypogastric nerve block performed during UFE. 20cc of 0.75% Ropivacaine injected at the superior hypogastric nerve plexus.

Procedure: Superior hypogastric nerve blockDrug: 0.75% Ropivacaine

Interventions

21g Chiba needle advanced into the superior hypogastric plexus via an anterior infraumbilical approach using the arterial catheter as a fluoroscopic landmark to target the vertebral body below.

Sup Hypogastric Nerve block group

20 ml of 0.75% Ropivacaine

Also known as: Naropin
Sup Hypogastric Nerve block group

Injection into subcutaneous tissues in periumbilical region

Control group

5ml of 1% Xylocaine

Also known as: Lidocaine
Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All women with symptomatic fibroids or adenomyosis that have requested and been approved for uterine artery embolization
  • Ability to comply with the requirements of the study procedures

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients in whom the vascular anatomy prevents access to the superior hypogastric nerve plexus safely
  • Patients who have known allergy to the anesthetic agent
  • Patients with signs of skin infection at the entry site of the needle used to place the nerve block
  • Patients with signs of infection such as fever
  • Patients with history of inflammatory bowel disease of with signs of colitis
  • Patients with uncorrectable abnormal coagulation status (INR \>1.5 and plt \< 50000 without use of anticoagulation agents)
  • Patients with preexisting conditions, which, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with the conduct of the study.
  • Patients who are uncooperative, cannot follow instructions, or who are unlikely to comply with follow-up appointments or fill-out the post-procedural pain questionnaires.
  • Patients with a mental state that may preclude completion of the study procedure or is unable to provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

McGill University Health Centre - Royal Victoria Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1, Canada

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Rasuli P, Jolly EE, Hammond I, French GJ, Preston R, Goulet S, Hamilton L, Tabib M. Superior hypogastric nerve block for pain control in outpatient uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 Dec;15(12):1423-9. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000137406.09852.A4.

    PMID: 15590800BACKGROUND
  • Yoon J, Valenti D, Muchantef K, Cabrera T, Toonsi F, Torres C, Bessissow A, Bandegi P, Boucher LM. Superior Hypogastric Nerve Block as Post-Uterine Artery Embolization Analgesia: A Randomized and Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Radiology. 2018 Oct;289(1):248-254. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172714. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

LeiomyomaAgnosia

Interventions

RopivacaineInjections, SubcutaneousLidocaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms, Muscle TissueNeoplasms, Connective and Soft TissueNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesInjectionsDrug Administration RoutesDrug TherapyTherapeuticsAcetanilides

Limitations and Caveats

Small number of patients. Single centre study. Occasional use of different narcotics needing morphine equivalent calculations. SHAM procedure did not place a needle as deep as in the study group.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Louis-Martin boucher
Organization
McGill University Health Centre

Study Officials

  • Louis-Martin NJ Boucher, MD/PhD

    McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2014

First Posted

October 21, 2014

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion

November 1, 2017

Study Completion

November 1, 2017

Last Updated

August 14, 2019

Results First Posted

August 5, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations