Evaluation of Two Hand Hygiene Products in ICUs
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Hand Hygiene Products in ICUs Using Hand Prints
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the immediate antimicrobial efficacy and persistence of two hand hygiene products on ICU Health Care Worker's skin flora by measuring bacterial organisms on hands using the hand print method. It is hypothesized that the product containing Chlorhexidine gluconate will provide more persistence than the alcohol product, resulting in less bacterial growth on the hand print plates. In addition, environmental monitoring for cleanliness will be captured from high touch surfaces in ICU patient rooms and common areas using Rodac plates and adenosine triphosphate tests.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Oct 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 16, 2017
CompletedOctober 23, 2024
September 1, 2024
3 months
September 17, 2014
January 31, 2017
September 30, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bacterial Colony Forming Units Present on Hand Prints After Time Spent in Common Areas
Hand print plates will be collected from HCWs immediately after use of hand hygiene product and after time spent in common areas. Each HCW will use both products at least 3 days apart. Hand print plates from each product for each HCW will be compared.
On each of 2 days, Hand print plates collected from one hand immediately after product use (T0) and from other hand after time spent in MICU common areas
Study Arms (2)
Alcohol hand sanitizer foam
ACTIVE COMPARATORAlcohol foam hand sanitizer applied with 1 pump into hands, spread over hands up to the wrist and rubbed until dry. Foam will be applied twice approximately 15-30 minutes apart on one day.
hand antiseptic with CHG and alcohol
ACTIVE COMPARATORHand antiseptic is applied by dispensing 1 pump into hands, spreading over the hands up to the wrist, and rubbing until dry. Hand antiseptic will be used twice approximately 15-30 minutes apart on one day.
Interventions
HCWs will be randomized to use one product on one day and the other product on another day at least 3 days apart. Each product will be applied using 1 pump from its dispenser and rubbed over the hands until dry. Gloves will be worn while the HCW is in the patient room. Upon exit from the room, HCW will washoout with that same product. One imprint will be made of the non-dominant hand onto media containing neutralizers. That hand will be gloved with a white cotton glove. The HCW will work in the common areas with timing recorded. Upon leaving the common area, the dominant ungloved hand will be imprinted onto a fresh media plate containing neutralizers.
Alcohol foam hand sanitizer applied with 1 pump into hands, spread over hands up to the wrist and rubbed until dry. Foam will be applied twice approximately 15-30 minutes apart on one day
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- HCW willing to participate in the study
- HCW willing to use non-Triclosan soap when soap is necessary throughout the study
- HCW who will don gloves prior to ICU patient room entry
You may not qualify if:
- Use of any CHG -containing products ( liquid hand soap, Sage wipes) on the ICU 72 hours prior to study initiation and throughout study
- HCW with patient bandage or other dressing on palm(s)
- Known sensitivity or allergy to CHG or alcohols in hand hygiene products
- Known sensitivity or allergy to the following components: Lecithin, Polysorbate 80,Trypticase Soy Agar, sodium bisulfate, sodium thioglycollate, sodium thiosulfate
- History of skin allergies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Solventum US LLClead
- 3Mcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Related Publications (1)
Deshpande A, Fox J, Wong KK, Cadnum JL, Sankar T, Jencson A, Schramm S, Fraser TG, Donskey CJ, Gordon S. Comparative Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Hand Sanitizers in Intensive Care Units Common Areas: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;39(3):267-271. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.293. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
PMID: 29382400DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Research Specialist
- Organization
- 3M Health Care Business
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abhishek Deshpande, MD, PhD
The Cleveland Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2014
First Posted
October 7, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 23, 2024
Results First Posted
May 16, 2017
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share