Lymphedema Study for Arm or Leg Lymphedema
Placebo-controlled, Case-controlled, Open Label Therapeutic Trial for Unilateral or Bilateral Lymphedema of Arm or Leg.
1 other identifier
interventional
117
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares the effectiveness of a study drug versus placebo in the treatment of lymphedema.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Mar 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 25, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 14, 2018
CompletedOctober 27, 2022
October 1, 2022
7.8 years
August 25, 2014
July 19, 2018
October 25, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Part 1: Count of Participants Able to Complete Ketoprofen Treatment
Participants who were able to complete ketoprofen treatment and experienced no treatment-related serious adverse events.
Baseline to month 6
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Histological Architecture
Quantitative assessment of paired histological specimens of lymphedema skin pre- and post-treatment with ketoprofen. The impact of treatment on cutaneous histopathology was evaluated through the use of an empirically-derived scoring system (comprised of dermal thickness, intercellular mucin content, deep dermal collagen content, and perivascular infiltrate); this quantitative assessment was developed and performed by a dermatopathologist. Each characteristic was weighted equally and each specimen was assigned a cumulative subscale score of 0-5. The scores were summed for a total score (range: 0-20) which is presented here. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of pathology. A quantitatively higher negative change indicates a more favorable therapeutic response in the histology.
Baseline; Month 4
Part 3: Measurement of Skin Thickness
Caliper-measured skin thickness (mm) was serially assessed and pre-to-post paired analysis was performed for both arms (Placebo and Ketoprofen) of the study.
Baseline and 4 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Part 2: Measurement of Skin Thickness
Baseline and 4 months
Part 3: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Histological Architecture
Baseline; 4 months
Part 2/Part 3: Change From Baseline in Bioimpedance Spectroscopy
Baseline; 4 months
Part 2/Part 3: Change in Limb Volume
Baseline; 4 months
Part 3: Change in Systemic Inflammatory Mediator Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)
Baseline; 4 months
Study Arms (4)
Part 1: Exploratory Group
EXPERIMENTALKetoprofen 225-300 mgs daily, taken orally Ketoprofen-exploratory group: 225-300 mgs daily for four to six months
Part 2: Open-label Group
EXPERIMENTALKetoprofen 225 mg daily, taken orally Open-label group: 75 mgs, three times daily, for four months
Part 3: Placebo Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants randomized to receive placebo: placebo, three times daily, taken orally Placebo: 1 capsule, three times daily, for four months
Part 3: Ketoprofen Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized to receive active medication: ketoprofen 75 mgs., three times daily, taken orally Ketoprofen: 1 capsule, three times daily, for four months
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- a history of lymphedema of one or more limbs (unilateral or bilateral), with a duration of \> 6 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with active cancer, infection or bleeding tendency will be excluded.
- We will also exclude patients with medical contraindications to NSAIDs, including history of allergies, know gastrointestinal intolerance, or other serious systemic illness (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, congestive heart failure, neurological or psychological impairment) that would impair the patients' ability to participate.
- Minors (\<18 years of age) \*\>90 years of age
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Related Publications (1)
Rockson SG, Tian W, Jiang X, Kuznetsova T, Haddad F, Zampell J, Mehrara B, Sampson JP, Roche L, Kim J, Nicolls MR. Pilot studies demonstrate the potential benefits of antiinflammatory therapy in human lymphedema. JCI Insight. 2018 Oct 18;3(20):e123775. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.123775.
PMID: 30333315DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Stanley Rockson
- Organization
- Stanford University, School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stanley G Rockson, MD
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Allan and Tina Neill Professor of Lymphatic Research and Medicine; Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2014
First Posted
October 7, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 27, 2022
Results First Posted
September 14, 2018
Record last verified: 2022-10