Rotator Cuff Repair Using Standard Double Row Technique With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane vs. Standard Double Row Technique
RCRPRFM
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Standard Double Row Technique With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane vs. Standard Double Row Technique: A Randomized Blinded Outcomes Study
1 other identifier
interventional
97
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a single-blind, randomized study evaluating the 6 month and 2 year outcomes of patients treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using one of two techniques. One technique used is the standard double row repairs utilizing medial and laterally based anchor fixation and the other technique is the standard double row repairs utilizing medial and laterally based anchor fixation with the use of plateley rich fibrin membrane (PRFM). It is hypothesized that patients undergoing the surgery with the PRFM will report a higher quality of life than the patients that do not receive this treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jul 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 9, 2017
CompletedAugust 9, 2017
October 1, 2015
4.4 years
August 4, 2014
January 24, 2017
July 11, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Return to Function
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index total score is on a scale of 0-2100; where 0 is the best score and 2100 is the score. There is a discrepancy between overall number of participants analyzed for this measure when compared to the participant flow module. More patients completed a baseline measure than those that completed the entire study.
Baseline
Return to Function
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index total score is on a scale of 0-2100; where 0 is the best score and 2100 is the score. There is a discrepancy between overall number of participants analyzed for this measure when compared to the participant flow module. More patients completed a baseline measure than those that completed the entire study.
6 months
Return to Function
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index
24 months
Other Outcomes (7)
Spraspinatus Strength Measurements
Baseline
MRI
6 months
Supraspinatus Strength Measurements
6 months
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Double Row
EXPERIMENTALDouble Row
Double Row with PRFM
EXPERIMENTALDouble Row with PRFM
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Evidence of a rotator cuff tear as determined by clinical examination and diagnostic imaging (MRI)
- Patient undergoes arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
- Age 18 or older
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has had a previous arthroscopic rotator cut repair
- A previous diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Evidence of major joint trauma, infection, avascular necrosis, chronic dislocation, inflammatory or degenerative glenohumeral arthropathy, frozen shoulder, or previous surgery of the affected shoulder,
- Evidence of significant rotator cuff arthropathy with superior humeral translation and acromial erosion diagnosed by x-ray or other investigations,
- Medical device that would exclude the patient from having a MRI, including a pacemaker, cardiac defibrillator, aneurysm clips, carotid artery clamp, neurostimulator, insulin or infusion pump, implanted drug infusion device, bone growth/fusion stimulator, or ear implant.
- Major medical illness (life expectancy less then 2 years or unacceptably high operative risk),
- Inability to speak or read English
- Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent.
- Pregnant patients.
- Age 17 or younger
- Unwillingness to be followed for 2 years.
- Bilateral Rotator cuff tear confirmed by clinical exam and MRI
- Patients enrolled in the study who demonstrate retear on clinical exam and MRI, then elect for a repeat surgery.
- Irreparable cuff tears or tears extending into the subscapularis or teres minor
- Isolated teres minor or subscapularis tears.
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- HealthPartners Institutelead
- Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
TRIA Orthopaedic Center
Bloomington, Minnesota, 55431, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
A disadvantage is the majority of the tears are small or medium sized. These have a higher intrinsic healing and as such may not require platelet augmentation to afford a successful outcome.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Walsh
- Organization
- Health Partners
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2014
First Posted
October 6, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 9, 2017
Results First Posted
August 9, 2017
Record last verified: 2015-10