NCT02256891

Brief Summary

This study is a single-blind, randomized study evaluating the 6 month and 2 year outcomes of patients treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using one of two techniques. One technique used is the standard double row repairs utilizing medial and laterally based anchor fixation and the other technique is the standard double row repairs utilizing medial and laterally based anchor fixation with the use of plateley rich fibrin membrane (PRFM). It is hypothesized that patients undergoing the surgery with the PRFM will report a higher quality of life than the patients that do not receive this treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
97

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2011

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2011

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 4, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 6, 2014

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 9, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

August 9, 2017

Status Verified

October 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

August 4, 2014

Results QC Date

January 24, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 11, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Rotator cuff tearRotator cuff injuryShoulder painShoulder injury

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Return to Function

    The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index total score is on a scale of 0-2100; where 0 is the best score and 2100 is the score. There is a discrepancy between overall number of participants analyzed for this measure when compared to the participant flow module. More patients completed a baseline measure than those that completed the entire study.

    Baseline

  • Return to Function

    The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index total score is on a scale of 0-2100; where 0 is the best score and 2100 is the score. There is a discrepancy between overall number of participants analyzed for this measure when compared to the participant flow module. More patients completed a baseline measure than those that completed the entire study.

    6 months

  • Return to Function

    Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index

    24 months

Other Outcomes (7)

  • Spraspinatus Strength Measurements

    Baseline

  • MRI

    6 months

  • Supraspinatus Strength Measurements

    6 months

  • +4 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Double Row

EXPERIMENTAL

Double Row

Procedure: Double Row

Double Row with PRFM

EXPERIMENTAL

Double Row with PRFM

Device: PRFMProcedure: Double Row

Interventions

PRFMDEVICE
Double Row with PRFM
Double RowPROCEDURE
Double RowDouble Row with PRFM

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Evidence of a rotator cuff tear as determined by clinical examination and diagnostic imaging (MRI)
  • Patient undergoes arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
  • Age 18 or older

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient has had a previous arthroscopic rotator cut repair
  • A previous diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Evidence of major joint trauma, infection, avascular necrosis, chronic dislocation, inflammatory or degenerative glenohumeral arthropathy, frozen shoulder, or previous surgery of the affected shoulder,
  • Evidence of significant rotator cuff arthropathy with superior humeral translation and acromial erosion diagnosed by x-ray or other investigations,
  • Medical device that would exclude the patient from having a MRI, including a pacemaker, cardiac defibrillator, aneurysm clips, carotid artery clamp, neurostimulator, insulin or infusion pump, implanted drug infusion device, bone growth/fusion stimulator, or ear implant.
  • Major medical illness (life expectancy less then 2 years or unacceptably high operative risk),
  • Inability to speak or read English
  • Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Age 17 or younger
  • Unwillingness to be followed for 2 years.
  • Bilateral Rotator cuff tear confirmed by clinical exam and MRI
  • Patients enrolled in the study who demonstrate retear on clinical exam and MRI, then elect for a repeat surgery.
  • Irreparable cuff tears or tears extending into the subscapularis or teres minor
  • Isolated teres minor or subscapularis tears.
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

TRIA Orthopaedic Center

Bloomington, Minnesota, 55431, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff InjuriesShoulder PainShoulder Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesTendon InjuriesArthralgiaJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

A disadvantage is the majority of the tears are small or medium sized. These have a higher intrinsic healing and as such may not require platelet augmentation to afford a successful outcome.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Michael Walsh
Organization
Health Partners

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2014

First Posted

October 6, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

August 9, 2017

Results First Posted

August 9, 2017

Record last verified: 2015-10

Locations