NCT02252094

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the use of ultra-protective ventilation, where very low ventilation volumes are used, in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) meeting criteria to nurse in the prone position. Half the patients will receive ultra-protective ventilation support by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, while the other half will receive conventional lung protective ventilation.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
8

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 17, 2014

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 29, 2014

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 22, 2017

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 14, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 17, 2014

Last Update Submit

September 10, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Plateau Pressure

    Ability to achieve a plateau pressure of \</=25 cmH20 in the intervention arm

    Duration of ventilation for severe ARDS, expected average time 10 days

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Length of stay in ICU stay

    Duration of patient stay in ICU, expected average stay 2 weeks

  • Length of hospital stay

    Duration of patient stay in hospital

  • Mortality

    Monitored for 3 months

  • Cardiac Imaging

    One data set per patient during first 72 hours

  • Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal related complications

    Duration of severe ARDS, expected average time frame 10 days

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Conventional lung protective ventilation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Lung protective ventilation (6ml/kg predicted body weight). All other interventions per intensive care unit standardised ARDS management protocol

Other: Conventional Lung Protective Ventilation

Ultra-protective ventilation

EXPERIMENTAL

Ultra-protective ventilation (\</= 3ml/kg predicted body weight) targeting plateau pressure of \</= 25 cmH2O, supported by Prismalung. All other intervention per intensive care unit standardised ARDS management protocol

Device: PrismalungOther: Ultra-protective ventilation

Interventions

Prism lung (Baxter Healthcare/Gambro Lund, Sweden) is an extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal device. It removes blood through a double lumen catheter and pumps it through a hollow fiber gas exchange cartridge which is impervious to fluid. Carbon dioxide diffuses out, down a concentration gradient which is maintained by sweep gas flowing through the centre of the hollow fibres. The decarboxylated blood is returned to the patient through the double lumen catheter.

Also known as: Low flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, Respiratory Dialysis
Ultra-protective ventilation

Ventilation with \</= 3ml/kg predicted body weight

Ultra-protective ventilation

Ventilation with 6ml/kg predicted body weight

Conventional lung protective ventilation

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Admitted to MICU with respiratory failure and intubated
  • ARDS criteria per Berlin definition
  • PaO2:FiO2 ratio ≤ 200 mmHg for \> 6 hours with FiO2 ≥0.5
  • Expected to require mechanical ventilation for \>48 hours
  • Reversible disease

You may not qualify if:

  • Anticoagulation contraindicated
  • Proven HIT
  • Unable to obtain central venous access
  • Refractory hypoxia (PaO2:FiO2 ≤80 after recruitment and proning) or other indication for ECMO
  • Home oxygen use
  • Severe COPD
  • Interstitial lung disease
  • \> 7 days of mechanical ventilation
  • Immunocompromised patient (bone marrow, untreated HIV, PJP)
  • Advanced malignancy with life expectancy ≤ 6months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

National University Hospital

Singapore, 119074, Singapore

Location

Ng Teng Fong General Hospital

Singapore, 609606, Singapore

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Terragni PP, Del Sorbo L, Mascia L, Urbino R, Martin EL, Birocco A, Faggiano C, Quintel M, Gattinoni L, Ranieri VM. Tidal volume lower than 6 ml/kg enhances lung protection: role of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Anesthesiology. 2009 Oct;111(4):826-35. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b764d2.

    PMID: 19741487BACKGROUND
  • Bein T, Weber-Carstens S, Goldmann A, Muller T, Staudinger T, Brederlau J, Muellenbach R, Dembinski R, Graf BM, Wewalka M, Philipp A, Wernecke KD, Lubnow M, Slutsky AS. Lower tidal volume strategy ( approximately 3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus 'conventional' protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: the prospective randomized Xtravent-study. Intensive Care Med. 2013 May;39(5):847-56. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2787-6. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

    PMID: 23306584BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration Disorders

Study Officials

  • Matthew E Cove, MBChB

    National University Health System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Data analysis will be blinded.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Matthew COVE

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2014

First Posted

September 29, 2014

Study Start

May 22, 2017

Primary Completion

May 31, 2019

Study Completion

May 31, 2019

Last Updated

September 14, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations