Study Stopped
Device no longer available in Singapore
Ultra-protective Pulmonary Ventilation Supported by Low Flow ECCO2R for Severe ARDS
U-Protect
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the use of ultra-protective ventilation, where very low ventilation volumes are used, in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) meeting criteria to nurse in the prone position. Half the patients will receive ultra-protective ventilation support by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, while the other half will receive conventional lung protective ventilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 22, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2019
CompletedSeptember 14, 2020
September 1, 2020
2 years
September 17, 2014
September 10, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Plateau Pressure
Ability to achieve a plateau pressure of \</=25 cmH20 in the intervention arm
Duration of ventilation for severe ARDS, expected average time 10 days
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Length of stay in ICU stay
Duration of patient stay in ICU, expected average stay 2 weeks
Length of hospital stay
Duration of patient stay in hospital
Mortality
Monitored for 3 months
Cardiac Imaging
One data set per patient during first 72 hours
Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal related complications
Duration of severe ARDS, expected average time frame 10 days
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conventional lung protective ventilation
ACTIVE COMPARATORLung protective ventilation (6ml/kg predicted body weight). All other interventions per intensive care unit standardised ARDS management protocol
Ultra-protective ventilation
EXPERIMENTALUltra-protective ventilation (\</= 3ml/kg predicted body weight) targeting plateau pressure of \</= 25 cmH2O, supported by Prismalung. All other intervention per intensive care unit standardised ARDS management protocol
Interventions
Prism lung (Baxter Healthcare/Gambro Lund, Sweden) is an extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal device. It removes blood through a double lumen catheter and pumps it through a hollow fiber gas exchange cartridge which is impervious to fluid. Carbon dioxide diffuses out, down a concentration gradient which is maintained by sweep gas flowing through the centre of the hollow fibres. The decarboxylated blood is returned to the patient through the double lumen catheter.
Ventilation with \</= 3ml/kg predicted body weight
Ventilation with 6ml/kg predicted body weight
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Admitted to MICU with respiratory failure and intubated
- ARDS criteria per Berlin definition
- PaO2:FiO2 ratio ≤ 200 mmHg for \> 6 hours with FiO2 ≥0.5
- Expected to require mechanical ventilation for \>48 hours
- Reversible disease
You may not qualify if:
- Anticoagulation contraindicated
- Proven HIT
- Unable to obtain central venous access
- Refractory hypoxia (PaO2:FiO2 ≤80 after recruitment and proning) or other indication for ECMO
- Home oxygen use
- Severe COPD
- Interstitial lung disease
- \> 7 days of mechanical ventilation
- Immunocompromised patient (bone marrow, untreated HIV, PJP)
- Advanced malignancy with life expectancy ≤ 6months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
National University Hospital
Singapore, 119074, Singapore
Ng Teng Fong General Hospital
Singapore, 609606, Singapore
Related Publications (2)
Terragni PP, Del Sorbo L, Mascia L, Urbino R, Martin EL, Birocco A, Faggiano C, Quintel M, Gattinoni L, Ranieri VM. Tidal volume lower than 6 ml/kg enhances lung protection: role of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Anesthesiology. 2009 Oct;111(4):826-35. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b764d2.
PMID: 19741487BACKGROUNDBein T, Weber-Carstens S, Goldmann A, Muller T, Staudinger T, Brederlau J, Muellenbach R, Dembinski R, Graf BM, Wewalka M, Philipp A, Wernecke KD, Lubnow M, Slutsky AS. Lower tidal volume strategy ( approximately 3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus 'conventional' protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: the prospective randomized Xtravent-study. Intensive Care Med. 2013 May;39(5):847-56. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2787-6. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
PMID: 23306584BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew E Cove, MBChB
National University Health System
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Data analysis will be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Matthew COVE
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2014
First Posted
September 29, 2014
Study Start
May 22, 2017
Primary Completion
May 31, 2019
Study Completion
May 31, 2019
Last Updated
September 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share